https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47437
Summary: better exception message for shutdown
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.20
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows Vista
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Prio
Mark Thomas wrote:
>Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2. struct.currentDateString is calculated in two different places
>> I propose to encapsulate that code into AccessDateStruct
>>
>> 3. Invocation of getDate() in invoke() (the only place where getDate()
>> is called):
>> I think that getDate() also c
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47439
Summary: PooledConnection.connect() fails to check for null
connection
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47440
Summary: Remove DB-specific SQL statements from test cases
(SELECT 1)
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47440
--- Comment #1 from Sebb 2009-06-27 05:19:01 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=23890)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23890)
Remove setValidattionQuery() calls
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.or
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47440
--- Comment #2 from Sebb 2009-06-27 05:19:46 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=23891)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23891)
Use validationQuery instead of "SELECT 1"
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.ap
But how could ThreadLocal be shared among all AccessLogValve instances on
the same server? After all, each thread access ThreadLocal has its own.
Another point, based on the java doc of ThreadLocal, maybe "private
ThreadLocal currentDateStruct" should be declared as
static?
2009/6/27 Konstantin
On 27/06/2009, Xie Xiaodong wrote:
> But how could ThreadLocal be shared among all AccessLogValve instances on
> the same server? After all, each thread access ThreadLocal has its own.
>
> Another point, based on the java doc of ThreadLocal, maybe "private
> ThreadLocal currentDateStruct" shoul
Yes, you're right. Both static and final. :)
2009/6/27 sebb
> On 27/06/2009, Xie Xiaodong wrote:
> > But how could ThreadLocal be shared among all AccessLogValve instances on
> > the same server? After all, each thread access ThreadLocal has its own.
> >
> > Another point, based on the java d
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47439
Filip Hanik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47439
Sebb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47439
--- Comment #3 from Sebb 2009-06-27 13:03:46 PST ---
Here's the result of using a "jdbc:oracle:" URL with the Derby JDBC client:
Testcase: testException(org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.test.TestException): Caused an
ERROR
null
java.sql.SQLE
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47439
Filip Hanik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47439
Sebb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
14 matches
Mail list logo