Le 30 mars 09 à 18:00, Mark Thomas a écrit :
Henri Gomez wrote:
Ain't those used for 5.5?
You can however just remove them from the build.
Other option is to copy them to the 5.5 and not referencing
the connectors for those set of classes.
Sorry - should have been clear. I only meant in Tomc
JSR 196 can be implemented only at the service levelIs it true??
--
Rahul Saxena
B.Tech Part III
Computer Science and Engineering
I.T. B.H.U. ,Varanasi
Contact No.-09452196645
On Apr 1, 2009, at 9:20 PM, Rahul Saxena wrote:
Is Tomcat currently supports JSR 196??
no.
I've been planning to work on jsr 196 for tomcat but haven't had much
time. I implemented support for jetty. Geronimo has a jsr 196
provider implementation but I haven't been able to pry the tck
On Apr 2, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Rahul Saxena wrote:
JSR 196 can be implemented only at the service levelIs it true??
not sure exactly what you mean each web app needs something to do
its authentication, whether it be a standard FORM/BASIC/DIGEST/
CLIENT_CERT auth thingy or a jsr 196 a
If we define a generic servlet for a particular host and then allow
servlets(of any application) in that particular host to implement that
generic servlet and then I think we can supply the servlet context of this
particular servlet to the correponding filter of that host .
On Wed, Apr 1, 200
Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> May be being the Servlet/JSP RI didn't allow too much 'revolution'.
>> Have you read the 3.0 spec draft? There is a fair amount of change.
>> Whether it
>> is good or not is a different question though.
>
> I read it. It's a new spec. Dot.
>
> May be being the RI prevents m
As you said "The auth thingy gets called once per request before the request
gets to any filters or servlets."So it means that all the requests will pass
through this auth thing and so it would be not be possible to use it for
particular hosts or contexts???
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:18 PM, David J
Xie Xiaodong wrote:
> Hello, Dear All,
>I have posted my revised proposal on the GSOC site for the project
> "Convert current Tomcat valves to Servlet Filters". And I've successfully
> build the source code Mark provided, and delved myself into it. I'll add the
> deliverables and timescale to t
Hello,
I want to join GSoC project titled "Convert current Tomcat valves to Servlet
Filters" and I just want to ask you some questions about it.
1. Will the work include writing of JUnit tests? If yes, which version? (3,
4)
2. I read that Tomcat uses SVN version control system. Is there any
pr
Hello, Dear All,
I found that "Double-Checked Locking Pattern" are heavily used in
AccessLogValve to get rid of race condition. But as far as I know, this
pattern will not work in Java according to this article:
http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel/DoubleCheckedLocking.html. I
think this
>> May be being the RI prevents major evolution/révolution ?
>
> Tomcat isn't the RI and hasn't been for some time.
Up to 2.5/2.1 ?
>> Tomcat Light is a good idea but only costin works on it.
> If you like the idea, help him out.
Why should we still get this kind of reply on Tomcat list ? ;-(
I
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46950
Andr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> May be being the RI prevents major evolution/révolution ?
>> Tomcat isn't the RI and hasn't been for some time.
>
> Up to 2.5/2.1 ?
>
>>> Tomcat Light is a good idea but only costin works on it.
>> If you like the idea, help him out.
>
> Why should we still get this kind o
anas Ahmed wrote:
>
>> Mark Thomas wrote :
>>
>>
>> Feedback:
>> Good first draft. There are a coupe of areas I would like to see more detail
>> on:
>>
>>1. Impact of Servlet 3 and async processing.
>
> Lack of asynchronous support in the Servlet 2.5 specification has caused
> server vendor
Rahul Saxena wrote:
Could you clarify please? I don't understand your solution.
> If we define a generic servlet for a particular host and then allow
> servlets(of any application) in that particular host to implement that
> generic servlet
Is "generic servlet" an interface? If so, we have no way
muz.Payne wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to join GSoC project titled "Convert current Tomcat valves to Servlet
> Filters" and I just want to ask you some questions about it.
Great. Welcome to the Tomcat dev community.
> 1. Will the work include writing of JUnit tests? If yes, which version? (3,
> 4)
Xie Xiaodong wrote:
> Hello, Dear All,
>I found that "Double-Checked Locking Pattern" are heavily used in
> AccessLogValve to get rid of race condition. But as far as I know, this
> pattern will not work in Java according to this article:
> http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel/DoubleChe
Mark Thomas wrote:
Asf has a great server framework, mina, but it's not used by Tc.
I'm not sure building Tomcat on top of another framework is a good idea. If you
have a PoC that shows otherwise that would be very interesting.
Mina is also ASF and why not speak with the MINA team ?
May be th
1- What is the main idea behind converting Current working Valves to Servlet
Filters.
2- What are the benifits from that work to the Tomcat.
3- What will be like Tomcat with having Filters than having Valves.(For what
reason Valves should be converted to Filters)
buddhi wickramarathne wrote:
> 1- What is the main idea behind converting Current working Valves to Servlet
> Filters.
Valves are Tomcat specific. Filters can be used with any container.
> 2- What are the benifits from that work to the Tomcat.
Remove duplication. Valve pipeline is very similar to
Author: markt
Date: Thu Apr 2 11:58:51 2009
New Revision: 761257
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=761257&view=rev
Log:
Tabs -> 8 spaces
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/ELNode.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/ELNode.java
URL:
http://svn
Thank you very much for your valuable comments, Mark. I've revised my
proposal according to your comments, and added the deliverables and time
schedule part. Any more comments, feedback and criticism to my proposal are
welcomed.
2009/4/2 Mark Thomas
> Xie Xiaodong wrote:
> > Hello, Dear All,
>
It was a mistake I wrote "servlet context of this particular servlet " .
Also as we have default host for a particular engine , we can have a default
context for a particular host , then pass its servlet context to the filter
, then can we map all servlets in this host to this filter or the servle
Author: markt
Date: Thu Apr 2 16:21:00 2009
New Revision: 761336
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=761336&view=rev
Log:
Misc code clean-up. Remove unused parameters / exceptions etc.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Compiler.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jas
Author: markt
Date: Thu Apr 2 16:22:13 2009
New Revision: 761338
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=761338&view=rev
Log:
Fix litmus test failure:
MKCOL with weird body must fail with 415 (RFC2518:8.3.1)
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/servlets/WebdavServlet.java
Modified:
Hello, Mark, I am greatly with you. After I finish my proposal, I will check
carefully what is the best way to solve this problem.
2009/4/2 Mark Thomas
> Xie Xiaodong wrote:
> > Hello, Dear All,
> >I found that "Double-Checked Locking Pattern" are heavily used in
> > AccessLogValve to get
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46957
Summary: Memory leak: tags in JSPs don't release Page Context
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
markt-2 wrote:
>
> muz.Payne wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I want to join GSoC project titled "Convert current Tomcat valves to
>> Servlet
>> Filters" and I just want to ask you some questions about it.
>
> Great. Welcome to the Tomcat dev community.
>
>> 1. Will the work include writing of JUnit t
I wouldn't be that concerned about configuration - tomcat can still
instantiate the filter
independent of web.xml, like it does with the valve.
Or the filter could be used 'user-space', i.e. user adding the filter
explicitly and not
using the declarative security.
One of the problems with tomcat a
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34110
--- Comment #3 from Dan Armbrust 2009-04-02
13:48:36 PST ---
I ran into this issue where tomcat was not giving me any information to go on
with one of my webapps.
After a long search, documented here:
http://marc.info/?t=12386172050
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34110
Dan Armbrust changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.armbrust.l...@gmail.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46958
Summary: manager XML interface hard-coded path in XSL
transformation
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.18
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Sev
Hello,
as I was reading on how to submit a bug report, I noticed that the page
http://tomcat.apache.org/bugreport.html links to a non-existing IRC server.
On the left hand side navigation there's a separate link to Freenode, so the
broken link should be removed.
Didn't seem appropriate to open up
Henri Gomez wrote:
>
> If i recall the tomcat story (10 years).
> Today
>
> Sun has it's own implementation, Grizzly.
> Jboss forked tc code in it's own implémentation for AS.
> Spring Source embed it in it's DM server.
It's disturbing that you fail to mention Geronimo altogether. If we can't
h
Author: billbarker
Date: Fri Apr 3 02:29:16 2009
New Revision: 761506
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=761506&view=rev
Log:
remove objection and votes
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/t
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote in message
news:49d55f2c.2030...@rowe-clan.net...
> Henri Gomez wrote:
>>
>> If i recall the tomcat story (10 years).
>> Today
>>
>> Sun has it's own implementation, Grizzly.
>> Jboss forked tc code in it's own implémentation for AS.
>> Spring Source embed it in it's
muz.Payne wrote
>I tried to connect to SVN repositories, but it do not work...
create a folder in your local partition name it as u want
check out with the url for the trunk to that folder
>What are user & password? Are they anonymous, blank?
no user name password need
As you said "An alternative would be to just define a small interface that
allows the filter to populate" ,does that mean defining an interface in the
default context for that host , and the filter can be instantiated using
servlet context for this default web app(context) and then allow users to
e
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Rahul Saxena <
rahul.saxena.cs...@itbhu.ac.in> wrote:
> As you said "An alternative would be to just define a small interface that
> allows the filter to populate" ,does that mean defining an interface in the
> default context for that host , and the filter can be
I have made appropriate changes in my application resulting from discussion
in the tomcat dev community. Also I further welcome any more comments on
it.
Thanks
--
Rahul Saxena
B.Tech Part III
Computer Science and Engineering
I.T. B.H.U. ,Varanasi
Contact No.-09452196645
Hello all,
As i have read from Servlet 3.0 specification about filters "A Filter and the
target servlet or resource at the end of the filter chain must execute in the
same invocation thread".
This mean if there are many Async Requests which are connected to filters, many
filters will be init
41 matches
Mail list logo
