https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45610
Summary: status-worker: Bug in request parameter parsing for
update action
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.5.26
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Author: billbarker
Date: Mon Aug 11 02:01:39 2008
New Revision: 684680
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=684680&view=rev
Log:
votes
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=6
Jim Manico wrote:
I would say that the era of Java up through 1.3 is dead. Java 1.4 and
above is the only thing I see in production anymore.
- Jim
The 2.5 Servlet spec mandates Java 1.5 so for TC6 and up you are fine.
TC5 needs to run on 1.4 (with the compat package) and TC4 should run on
1.3
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by TimFunk:
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Miscellaneous
The comment on the change is:
startup order
Mark Thomas schrieb:
The 2.5 Servlet spec mandates Java 1.5 so for TC6 and up you are fine.
i'm working on trunk (are all files hostet in one trunk?)
i've removed some Classes and it works fine tomcat now has more speed
(startup takes 1/2 time ~800ms)
with changes to the code (use of Collect
Jens Kapitza wrote:
Mark Thomas schrieb:
The 2.5 Servlet spec mandates Java 1.5 so for TC6 and up you are fine.
i'm working on trunk (are all files hostet in one trunk?)
Yes they are.
i've removed some Classes and it works fine tomcat now has more speed
(startup takes 1/2 time ~800ms)
wit
Mark Thomas schrieb:
Jens Kapitza wrote:
Mark Thomas schrieb:
The 2.5 Servlet spec mandates Java 1.5 so for TC6 and up you are fine.
i'm working on trunk (are all files hostet in one trunk?)
Yes they are.
I've browsed the SVN a little bit, there are tags (branches) for tomcat 4,5
i think th
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45613
Summary: use of generics in package org.apache.tomcat.util.http
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: billbarker
Date: Mon Aug 11 02:01:39 2008
New Revision: 684680
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=684680&view=rev
Log:
votes
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45609
Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45609
--- Comment #2 from Jirat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-11 08:45:13 PST ---
Thank you very much,
but then how can we fix this issues?
I already follow your link but it doesn't provide the solution.
I also searched for Java2D or stream or
Author: markt
Date: Mon Aug 11 10:35:04 2008
New Revision: 684832
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=684832&view=rev
Log:
Update with details for CVE-2008-2938
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-4.html
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-5.html
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-6.
Author: markt
Date: Mon Aug 11 13:09:09 2008
New Revision: 684899
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=684899&view=rev
Log:
Add other votes from security list for the record
Modified:
tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/v
Author: markt
Date: Mon Aug 11 13:16:02 2008
New Revision: 684900
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=684900&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41217
Mark SSO cookies as secure. This is CVE-2008-0128.
Modified:
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/RELEASE-NOTE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: funkman
Date: Sun Aug 10 16:50:06 2008
New Revision: 684613
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=684613&view=rev
Log:
Followup on request to review
Many thanks.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
Author: markt
Date: Mon Aug 11 13:20:20 2008
New Revision: 684901
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=684901&view=rev
Log:
CVE-2008-0128 is now fixed in TC4 trunk
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-4.html
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/security-4.xml
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/se
Author: markt
Date: Mon Aug 11 13:57:16 2008
New Revision: 684922
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=684922&view=rev
Log:
Correct SSL docs as to the list of ciphers used by default. Add note about
export grade ciphers. Add note (already in TC4) about cipher naming.
Modified:
tomcat/contai
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453
--- Comment #65 from Luis Naver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-11 14:00:43 PST ---
I just got bit by this bug and lost a good part of my day trying to locate it.
I have tomcat on my development machine (winXP) configured to UTC and the
ma
Author: markt
Date: Mon Aug 11 14:31:58 2008
New Revision: 684944
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=684944&view=rev
Log:
Lay groundwork for adding links to associated svn commits to vulnerability
pages. Also make clear up front that we don't provide binary patches.
Modified:
tomcat/site/
Hi,
I am a bit new to Tomcat, but have a really quick question. I am trying to
deploy a new single class file to an existing Tomcat application, however, I
am using Rational Application Developer 7.0 to create the class. When I
deploy the new class to the Tomcat 4.1 web application, the page cras
I posted a couple messages to the user/dev lists last week asking the
same question, but still haven't seen any mention of a plan to release
a new 5.5.x or 4.1.x to fix the security issues posted at the
beginning of the month.
Is there a plan to push a new release for either 5.5.x or 4.1.x or
shou
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45617
Summary: Resource is not closed
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows 2000
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45618
Summary: Selector is not closed.
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows 2000
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
23 matches
Mail list logo
