DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45313] mod_jk 1.2.26 & apache 2.2. 9 static compiled on solaris not able to connect

2008-07-14 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45313 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-14 01:25:44 PST --- Hi, configure option where as follows: for mod_jk: --with-apache= for apache: --with-mpm=worker --disable-so --disable-authn-file --disable-authn-de

svn commit: r676510 - in /tomcat/trunk: build.properties.default build.xml dist.xml res/tomcat.nsi

2008-07-14 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Mon Jul 14 01:36:41 2008 New Revision: 676510 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=676510&view=rev Log: Use tomcat native from ASF repository instead downloading at install time from tomcat.heanet.ie Modified: tomcat/trunk/build.properties.default tomcat/trunk/build.

svn commit: r676511 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-07-14 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Mon Jul 14 01:46:11 2008 New Revision: 676511 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=676511&view=rev Log: Propose r676510 for backport Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trun

svn commit: r676512 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-07-14 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Mon Jul 14 01:49:21 2008 New Revision: 676512 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=676512&view=rev Log: Oops. Move the proposal to the end of the list Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/t

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.17

2008-07-14 Thread jean-frederic clere
Mark Thomas wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.17/ According to the release process, the 6.0.17 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [X] Beta [ ] Stable I see consistent failures to start (CNFE) with the -security opti

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45392] New: No OCSP support for client SSL verification

2008-07-14 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45392 Summary: No OCSP support for client SSL verification Product: Tomcat 6 Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: PatchAvailable

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45392] No OCSP support for client SSL verification

2008-07-14 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45392 --- Comment #1 from Aristotelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-14 03:35:16 PST --- Created an attachment (id=22252) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22252) patch to add basic support for OCSP for tomcat-native 1.1

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45392] No OCSP support for client SSL verification

2008-07-14 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45392 --- Comment #2 from Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-14 03:54:15 PST --- Few things, about the patch. 1. Please use 4 spaces instead TAB 2. New files must have ASL 2.0 license header at the top. Please make the patch against the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45392] No OCSP support for client SSL verification

2008-07-14 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45392 --- Comment #3 from Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-14 04:45:36 PST --- -1. Please do not add zillions of random features to the Tomcat native code. If APR supports it, then it's ok, otherwise I don't think this is a good id

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45392] No OCSP support for client SSL verification

2008-07-14 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45392 --- Comment #4 from Aristotelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-14 05:13:52 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > -1. Please do not add zillions of random features to the Tomcat native code. > If > APR supports it, then it's ok, otherwise I d

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45392] No OCSP support for client SSL verification

2008-07-14 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45392 --- Comment #5 from Aristotelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-14 05:18:15 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > Few things, about the patch. > 1. Please use 4 spaces instead TAB > 2. New files must have ASL 2.0 license header at the top. >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45392] No OCSP support for client SSL verification

2008-07-14 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45392 Aristotelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22251|0 |1 is obso

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45392] No OCSP support for client SSL verification

2008-07-14 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45392 --- Comment #7 from Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-14 07:13:29 PST --- OK, thanks for the patch. However this won't be acceptable until you resolve portability issues. The https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=em

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.17

2008-07-14 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Remy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.17/ According to the release process, the 6.0.17 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Rémy - To unsub

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45381] Throw UnsupportedOperationException for session replication

2008-07-14 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45381 Filip Hanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |INVALID --- C

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.17

2008-07-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jul 13, 2008, at 6:19 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.17/ According to the release process, the 6.0.17 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [X] Beta [ ] Stable I see consistent failures to start

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45395] New: MsgAjp dump method does not dump packet when being written

2008-07-14 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45395 Summary: MsgAjp dump method does not dump packet when being written Product: Tomcat 6 Version: 6.0.16 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Key

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45395] MsgAjp dump method does not dump packet when being written

2008-07-14 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45395 Steve Parr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]