+1 also here, I'm using JConsole extensivly
2008/5/5 Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you don't add the option - you'll see that tomcat uses a separate mbean
> > server. I want to have it consistent -
> >
The AJP protocol allows forwarding of arbitrary request attributes. For
instance we allow to send httpd environment variables via JkEnvVar as
request attributes to the backend.
The attributes can be retrieved on the backend side via
request.getAttribute(attributeName).
Unfortunately attribut
Author: markt
Date: Mon May 5 02:58:38 2008
New Revision: 653398
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=653398&view=rev
Log:
All the known vulnerabilities should be listed now.
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security.html
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/security.xml
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk
Author: remm
Date: Mon May 5 04:54:26 2008
New Revision: 653440
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=653440&view=rev
Log:
- Votes.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=6534
Question :
Where should be commited (for review), the stuff for mavenization ?
I'll have some time next week to works on
2008/5/1 Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Costin Manolache schrieb:
>
>
> > I'm confused - there is a tomcat6/trunk repo - isn't this the trunk ?
> >
>
> trunk:http
Henri Gomez wrote:
Question :
Where should be commited (for review), the stuff for mavenization ?
Providing in is just adding a directory/file or two then trunk is the place
for it.
If it requires re-organisation of the source tree (which if I have have
understood the discussion to date it
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062
Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
---
> Providing in is just adding a directory/file or two then trunk is the place
> for it.
Only adding files and directories
> If it requires re-organisation of the source tree (which if I have have
> understood the discussion to date it doesn't) it should probably go in a new
> branch.
No reorga
Author: markt
Date: Mon May 5 09:08:07 2008
New Revision: 653519
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=653519&view=rev
Log:
Fix various Eclipse warnings. Generics, unused code, etc
No functional change.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/startup/HostConfig.java
Modified: tomcat
>From Rainer's email few days ago:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/
I suppose after it's in it may be backported to the stable branches if it
works well and people like it.
Costin
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Providing in is just addin
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44021
Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43013
Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Author: markt
Date: Mon May 5 11:18:00 2008
New Revision: 653549
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=653549&view=rev
Log:
Fix bugs https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43013 and
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44021
Add support to manger and deployer for wars a
Costin Manolache wrote:
From Rainer's email few days ago:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/
I suppose after it's in it may be backported to the stable branches if it
works well and people like it.
Exactly.
Mark
---
Author: markt
Date: Mon May 5 12:00:08 2008
New Revision: 653559
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=653559&view=rev
Log:
Propose fix for 43013/44021
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44021
--- Comment #12 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-05 12:01:28 PST
---
I have committed a fix for this to trunk and proposed it for 6.0.x and 5.5.x.
If you rea able to test the fix and report back that would be great.
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44938
Summary: the thread http-80-SendFile-0 consumes 100% of CPU and
slow tomcat responses
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.14
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status:
Good Thanks
2008/5/5 Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Costin Manolache wrote:
>
> >
> > > From Rainer's email few days ago:
> > >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/
> >
> > I suppose after it's in it may be backported to the stable branches if it
> > works well and people like it.
18 matches
Mail list logo
