Re: svn commit: r609757 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native: apache-1.3/mod_jk.c apache-2.0/mod_jk.c common/jk_service.h common/jk_util.c iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c netscape/jk_nsapi_plugin.c

2008-01-08 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Does that make sense for you? Yes it does. The most important is that if there was no retries set for ajp worker, it gets copied from lb worker. In fact we don't copy (this is not new), because the retries for an lb has a different

svn commit: r609919 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-01-08 Thread pero
Author: pero Date: Tue Jan 8 02:11:44 2008 New Revision: 609919 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609919&view=rev Log: Cast my vote Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=

Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-08 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 11:20 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > we have a lot of updates added in, I think it may be good to set a date > for our next release and work towards that r297710 is a hack, and reintroduces a data corruption bug that was fixed a long time ago. Rémy -

Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-08 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
ok, I'll take a look at this before we move on Filip Remy Maucherat wrote: On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 11:20 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: we have a lot of updates added in, I think it may be good to set a date for our next release and work towards that r297710 is a hack, and reint

svn commit: r610095 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-01-08 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Tue Jan 8 10:50:29 2008 New Revision: 610095 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=610095&view=rev Log: new proposals, one is for a bug that regressed Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/

Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-08 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Remy Maucherat wrote: On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 11:20 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: we have a lot of updates added in, I think it may be good to set a date for our next release and work towards that r297710 is a hack, and reintroduces a data corruption bug that was fixed a long tim

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43929] - JSP POST SSI, JSP sub request does not complete

2008-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43929] - JSP POST SSI, JSP sub request does not complete

2008-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Pojo Application Server: Release 1.0.3

2008-01-08 Thread Johnny Kewl
A POJO Application Server... Lets one develop normal full java applications outside of the container. When they are dropped into the container only the UI side runs on the remote clients machine, thus one gets a light weight Rich Client, with no additional effort. The rest of the application run

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43929] - JSP POST SSI, JSP sub request does not complete

2008-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r610159 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-01-08 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Jan 8 13:17:52 2008 New Revision: 610159 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=610159&view=rev Log: Propose fix for 43692 Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATU

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43692] - Catalina Ant JMX is currently unused, and seems unnecessary.

2008-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43929] - JSP POST SSI, JSP sub request does not complete

2008-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r610157 - in /tomcat/trunk: build.xml dist.xml extras.xml java/org/apache/catalina/ant/jmx/JMXAccessorCondition.java java/org/apache/catalina/ant/jmx/JMXAccessorEqualsCondition.java

2008-01-08 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Jan 8 13:15:40 2008 New Revision: 610157 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=610157&view=rev Log: Clean up build scripts. Patch provided by Paul Shemansky. Modified: tomcat/trunk/build.xml tomcat/trunk/dist.xml tomcat/trunk/extras.xml tomcat/trunk/java/o

svn commit: r610173 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/filters/ChunkedInputFilter.java

2008-01-08 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Tue Jan 8 13:45:03 2008 New Revision: 610173 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=610173&view=rev Log: fix regression for bug 7 while maintaining the no need to proceed and block for comet connections that handle chunked input Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43929] - JSP POST SSI, JSP sub request does not complete

2008-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43929] - JSP POST SSI, JSP sub request does not complete

2008-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r609757 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native: apache-1.3/mod_jk.c apache-2.0/mod_jk.c common/jk_service.h common/jk_util.c iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c netscape/jk_nsapi_plugin.c

2008-01-08 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Mladen, I found it :) Mladen Turk schrieb: Rainer Jung wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Does that make sense for you? Yes it does. The most important is that if there was no retries set for ajp worker, it gets copied from lb worker. In fact we don't copy (this is not new)

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43929] - JSP POST SSI, JSP sub request does not complete

2008-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43929] - JSP POST SSI, JSP sub request does not complete

2008-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44187] New: - create new session when refresh browser after submit to the other service at 80 port

2008-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r609757 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native: apache-1.3/mod_jk.c apache-2.0/mod_jk.c common/jk_service.h common/jk_util.c iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c netscape/jk_nsapi_plugin.c

2008-01-08 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Mladen, I found it :) It was like that in 1.2.15. Then in July 2006, shortly before 1.2.18 you changed that: I knew it ;) I even know why I changed that, but that's another story. Nevertheless, sorry for the noise. Regards, Mladen -