JK 1.2.26 ?

Hi to all, When should jk 1.2.26 should be released ? Did there is still showstoppers ? Regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Tomcat and SessionHandling

Hi, I'm new here! Generally, I'm new in the topic servlets etc. so I hope I can explain my problem well. In our company we work with some web applications running in Internet Explorer. We want to use Tomcat as servlet engine / webserver. The problem is the session handling of Tomcat. For

Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC

On Sep 10, 2007, at 8:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: How about: o CTR on trunk o Various release branches are made (ala httpd, apr, etc...). These include a STATUS file. o All code applied to the release branch is under lazy consensus but *must* be specifi

Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC

On Sep 10, 2007, at 4:47 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote: The main idea is that since there's only one trunk branch, there should be agreement on APIs and important topics to proceed ++1. So let's start that now. Since there is not agreement on APIs, how do we proceed from here? Or, in other wo

Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC

Jim Jagielski wrote: I have no idea how you could possibly justify that statement. With RTC one *requires* 3 +1 votes. The above does not. And STATUS is there to indicate what *will* be done, not what *has* been done. It's usually a good idea to actually read and understand posts before automat

Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC

Jim Jagielski wrote: On Sep 10, 2007, at 4:47 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote: The main idea is that since there's only one trunk branch, there should be agreement on APIs and important topics to proceed ++1. So let's start that now. Since there is not agreement on APIs, how do we proceed from here?

Re: JK 1.2.26 ?

Hi Henri, 1.2.25 is still pretty young :) There are 2 new bugs for 1.2.25 that I'm aware of: - BZ 43287 (already fixed) - BZ 43229 (still needs to be fixed, should be fixed in next release) Version 1.2.25 is now 1 month old. So a reasonable target release date would be in about 10 weeks? Do

Re: Tomcat and SessionHandling

Preuss, Jacqueline - ENCOWAY wrote: > Hi, I'm new here! > > > > Generally, I'm new in the topic servlets etc. so I hope I can explain my > problem well. > > > > In our company we work with some web applications running in Internet > Explorer. We want to use Tomcat as servlet engine / web

Re: JK 1.2.26 ?

2007/9/11, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Henri, > > 1.2.25 is still pretty young :) Yes > There are 2 new bugs for 1.2.25 that I'm aware of: > > - BZ 43287 (already fixed) > - BZ 43229 (still needs to be fixed, should be fixed in next release) > > Version 1.2.25 is now 1 month old. So a r

Re: JK 1.2.26 ?

Henri Gomez wrote: 2007/9/11, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Henri, 1.2.25 is still pretty young :) Yes There are 2 new bugs for 1.2.25 that I'm aware of: - BZ 43287 (already fixed) - BZ 43229 (still needs to be fixed, should be fixed in next release) Version 1.2.25 is now 1 month ol

Re: JK 1.2.26 ?

Thanks a lot :) 2007/9/11, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Henri Gomez wrote: > > 2007/9/11, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Hi Henri, > >> > >> 1.2.25 is still pretty young :) > > > > Yes > > > >> There are 2 new bugs for 1.2.25 that I'm aware of: > >> > >> - BZ 43287 (already fixed) > >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43356] New: - keystoreFile parameter, when specified as relative, is not treated relative to $CATALINA_BASE or catalina.base property for NioEndPoint

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42983] - Creating a custom tag with an attribute named "class" causes exception

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43356] - keystoreFile parameter, when specified as relative, is not treated relative to $CATALINA_BASE or catalina.base property for NioEndPoint

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu