Feature request /Discussion: JK loadbalancer improvements for high load

2007-07-04 Thread Yefym Dmukh
Hi all, sorry for the stress but it seems that it is a time to come back to the discussion related to the load balancing for JVM (Tomcat). Prehistory: Recently we made benchmark and smoke tests of our product at the sun high tech centre in Langen (Germany). As the webserver apache2.2.4 has b

svn commit: r553218 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/Cookies.java

2007-07-04 Thread jfclere
Author: jfclere Date: Wed Jul 4 07:29:19 2007 New Revision: 553218 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=553218 Log: Arrange the handling of cookies values. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/Cookies.java Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/t

Re: Feature request /Discussion: JK loadbalancer improvements for high load

2007-07-04 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi, implementing a management communication between the lb and the backend is on the roadmap for jk3. It is somehow unlikely, that this will help in your situation, because when doing a GC the jvm will no longer respond to the management channel. Traditional Mark Sweep Compact GC is not disti

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42811] New: - Embedding in Tomcat 5.5.23 is completely broken

2007-07-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42811] - Embedding in Tomcat 5.5.23 is completely broken

2007-07-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu