Re: Tagging 1.2.22

Hi, > Hi there is new quality check release available from: > http://people.apache.org/~mturk/jk-1.2.22-dev/ > It contains few minor fixes mostly for documentation > and release script (owner/group for .tar) > I'll give it 24 hours before making a tag for any > last minute checks. +1 for NetWare,

Re: memory leak with shrinking thread pools

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Here is a revised patch for the memory leak. One thing I noticed is that it goes a little farther than I think it does. Since every request processor gets registered with JMX, I just couldn't find a spot where it was unregistered. And since the name was dynamic, ie

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41956] - New HTTP connector - The ip address not saved within server.xml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41956] - New HTTP connector - The ip address not saved within server.xml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: memory leak with shrinking thread pools

Hi Filip, I have test your patch with my comet testclient. It seems not working. The RequestProcessors JMX Objects aren't deregistered: Access Log: '127.0.0.1:30014' 2007-04-12 13:05:46 /cometchat/?null - - - 200 0.001 '127.0.0.1:30014' 2007-04-12 13:05:46 /cometchat/chat?null 'connect'

Re: Candidate binaries for 6.0.11

After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so, things look good to me. Yoav On 4/11/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Candidate binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.11/ Rémy -

Re: memory leak with shrinking thread pools

Peter Rossbach wrote: Hi Filip, I have test your patch with my comet testclient. It seems not working. The RequestProcessors JMX Objects aren't deregistered: So far the patch is only for NIO, I will make it for APR and JIO today. Access Log: '127.0.0.1:30014' 2007-04-12 13:05:46 /cometch

Re: Tagging 1.2.22

diff to our last candidate and simple build on Solaris look good :) Mladen Turk wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, The quality check release was out few days ago. Hi there is new quality check release available from: http://people.apache.org/~mturk/jk-1.2.22-dev/ It contains few minor fixes most

svn commit: r527964 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11NioProcessor.java

Author: fhanik Date: Thu Apr 12 07:53:06 2007 New Revision: 527964 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=527964 Log: Don't unmark the object as a comet, if we do, it will not call the cleanup for it Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11NioProcessor.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40668] - MailSessionFactory is missing in Tomcat 5.5.23

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: memory leak with shrinking thread pools

Hi Filip, I have testet with NIO and the memory leak is still there. Peter Am 12.04.2007 um 16:29 schrieb Filip Hanik - Dev Lists: Peter Rossbach wrote: Hi Filip, I have test your patch with my comet testclient. It seems not working. The RequestProcessors JMX Objects aren't deregiste

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40668] - MailSessionFactory is missing in Tomcat 5.5.23

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: memory leak with shrinking thread pools

HI Filip, with your last checkin my trace changed but leak is there. Also I got a exception too: 12.04.2007 17:20:30 org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioSelectorPool getSharedSelector INFO: Using a shared selector for servlet write/read Event received connect BEGIN Getting handler for action con

svn commit: r527981 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/juli/ClassLoaderLogManager.java

Author: remm Date: Thu Apr 12 08:34:51 2007 New Revision: 527981 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=527981 Log: - 42085: The handlers for the root logger are now added in addLogger when they are explicitly specified. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/juli/ClassLoader

Re: memory leak with shrinking thread pools

Peter Rossbach wrote: HI Filip, with your last checkin my trace changed but leak is there. Also I got a exception too: yes, still working on it, Filip 12.04.2007 17:20:30 org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioSelectorPool getSharedSelector INFO: Using a shared selector for servlet write/read Event

Re: Candidate binaries for 6.0.11

Yoav Shapira wrote: After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so, things look good to me. Yes, they seem fine. Most likely however, I won't propose a vote on them, as I would prefer picking up the NIO fixes with a 6.0.12 tag. Rémy --

Re: Annotation processing - Geronimo injection

David Jencks wrote: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12355273/GERONIMO-3010-4.patch In addition, this one combines the InstanceManager interfaces. I think this is a bad idea because it forces jasper to use an interface shared with catalina, which the previous patch does not.

Re: Candidate binaries for 6.0.11

+1 Peter Am 12.04.2007 um 18:13 schrieb Remy Maucherat: Yoav Shapira wrote: After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so, things look good to me. Yes, they seem fine. Most likely however, I won't propose a vote on them, as I would prefer picking up the NIO fixes wit

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42103] New: - Parans trustStoreType trustStorePass trustStoreFile

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40668] - MailSessionFactory is missing in Tomcat 5.5.23

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Candidate binaries for 6.0.11

On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 18:13 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Yoav Shapira wrote: > > After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so, > > things look good to me. > > Yes, they seem fine. Most likely however, I won't propose a vote on > them, as I would prefer picking up the NIO f

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42104] New: - Tomcat crash unespected

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Candidate binaries for 6.0.11

Remy Maucherat wrote: Yoav Shapira wrote: After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so, things look good to me. Yes, they seem fine. Most likely however, I won't propose a vote on them, as I would prefer picking up the NIO fixes with a 6.0.12 tag. much appreciated, I'm s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40668] - MailSessionFactory is missing in Tomcat 5.5.23

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40668] - MailSessionFactory is missing in Tomcat 5.5.23

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Annotation processing - Geronimo injection

On Apr 12, 2007, at 9:15 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote: David Jencks wrote: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12355273/ GERONIMO-3010-4.patch In addition, this one combines the InstanceManager interfaces. I think this is a bad idea because it forces jasper to use an interface sh

svn commit: r528084 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_version.h

Author: mturk Date: Thu Apr 12 11:47:35 2007 New Revision: 528084 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=528084 Log: Mark version for a release. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_version.h Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_version.h URL: http:

svn commit: r528085 - /tomcat/connectors/tags/jk1.2.x/JK_1_2_22/

Author: mturk Date: Thu Apr 12 11:52:18 2007 New Revision: 528085 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=528085 Log: made a copy Added: tomcat/connectors/tags/jk1.2.x/JK_1_2_22/ - copied from r528084, tomcat/connectors/trunk/ ---

Re: Annotation processing - Geronimo injection

David Jencks wrote: Excellent, thanks! Would this be shortly after 6.0.11 is out or further in the future? If you have any guess about a date it would be much appreciated. No idea. For example, I thought 6.0.11 would be ok, but it's not. I don't know if I'll commit as is either, since I did

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42104] - Tomcat crash unespected

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Candidate binaries for 6.0.11

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: much appreciated, I'm still working on the "deregistering" of the JMX resources, somehow they are slipping through the cracks Originally, the purpose of the JMX stuff was to provide thread monitoring. Now that the processors are not tied to threads anymore, it b

svn commit: r528323 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/coyote/ java/org/apache/coyote/http11/ java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/ webapps/docs/config/

Author: fhanik Date: Thu Apr 12 19:28:01 2007 New Revision: 528323 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=528323 Log: Fix the handling of the Http11NioProcessors when the thread pool can be shrinking and growing. So we are not associating the processor with a thread local, instead going

svn commit: r528341 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml

Author: fhanik Date: Thu Apr 12 20:22:29 2007 New Revision: 528341 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=528341 Log: Updated with some useful info Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/view

svn commit: r528347 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11NioProcessor.java

Author: fhanik Date: Thu Apr 12 21:19:09 2007 New Revision: 528347 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=528347 Log: Since we can keep alive a HTTP connection, even after we have stopped using it as a comet, then we need to go back to the original timeout Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/tr

Re: Candidate binaries for 6.0.11

Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: much appreciated, I'm still working on the "deregistering" of the JMX resources, somehow they are slipping through the cracks Originally, the purpose of the JMX stuff was to provide thread monitoring. Now that the processors are not tied to

[VOTE] Releasing Tomcat Connectors 1.2.22

Hi, Mod_jk 1.2.22 has been available for testing for some days. No new bugs have been reported so far, so it is time to proceed with the release vote. The source distribution can be downloaded from: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.22/ or http://www.apache.org