Re: Should we release mod_jk 1.2.21.1 or 1.2.22?

Rainer Jung wrote: > > Somehow 1.2.21.1 would express the right thing, but our versioning > header files don't (yet) have the structure to easily make a 1.2.21.1. Version numbers are cheap - roll 1.2.22. - To unsubscribe, e-ma

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41818] New: - Realm authenticate(.) method enhancement

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41819] New: - JSF components does not work inside a JSP tag

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38797] - 5.5.12 and 5.5.15 emit different code on

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41819] - JSF components does not work inside a JSP tag

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Should we release mod_jk 1.2.21.1 or 1.2.22?

On Mar 11, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: [X] Simply release 1.2.22 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Tomcat Webservices JSR109 implementation

Hi, I prepare a new patch for the ServiceRefFactory, available here : http://fabien.carrion.free.fr/tomcat/tomcat-6.0-patch2-webservices.diff.bz2 There is a new target called webservices in extra.xml I have some doubts on the url to use to download the libraries. Thanks -Original Message--

Re: Tomcat Webservices JSR109 implementation

Carrion, Fabian (GE Money, consultant) wrote: Hi, I prepare a new patch for the ServiceRefFactory, available here : http://fabien.carrion.free.fr/tomcat/tomcat-6.0-patch2-webservices.diff.bz2 There is a new target called webservices in extra.xml I have some doubts on the url to use to download

mod_jk 1.2.22-dev test

Hi, thanks to all for you feedback about the version numbers. I've uploaded mod_jk 1.2.22-dev-517211 to http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/. This release will be primarily targeted at closing BZ 41770. So there are intentionally no heavy changes in it. I should better say: all risky

svn commit: r517224 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/DefaultErrorHandler.java

Author: remm Date: Mon Mar 12 07:04:34 2007 New Revision: 517224 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=517224 Log: - Fix reporting of errors which do not correspond to a portion of the JSP source. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/DefaultErrorHandler.ja

svn commit: r517227 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Generator.java

Author: remm Date: Mon Mar 12 07:24:55 2007 New Revision: 517227 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=517227 Log: - Remove try/catch usage for annotation processing in classic tags. The usage of the log method might have been questionable as well. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/j

svn commit: r517231 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/DefaultErrorHandler.java

Author: remm Date: Mon Mar 12 07:34:39 2007 New Revision: 517231 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=517231 Log: - Cleanup of the message that is displayed. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/DefaultErrorHandler.java Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/jav

svn commit: r517274 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/resources/LocalStrings.properties

Author: remm Date: Mon Mar 12 09:31:02 2007 New Revision: 517274 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=517274 Log: - Cleanup of the message that is displayed (forgot resource). Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/resources/LocalStrings.properties Modified: tomcat

Re: mod_jk 1.2.22-dev test

I'm tracking right now the iSeries problem (present in 1.2.20 and 1.2.21) and it's located somewhere in jk_log() (jk_util.c). 2007/3/12, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi, thanks to all for you feedback about the version numbers. I've uploaded mod_jk 1.2.22-dev-517211 to http://people.apach

Re: mod_jk 1.2.22-dev test

Henri Gomez wrote: I'm tracking right now the iSeries problem (present in 1.2.20 and 1.2.21) and it's located somewhere in jk_log() (jk_util.c). That would be great, since only you reported that there is a core on that platform. Nevertheless, I presume it is either compiler or OS issue, since

Re: Tomcat 6 Scales

Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: We're doing pretty well with Comet, the only thing comet is missing is a non blocking write. It is possible to do that without changing the API, in case it is needed. It has a possibly significant cost however (buffering all data which can

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat 5.5.23 released

Wendy Smoak wrote: On 3/9/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache Tomcat 5.5.23 stable. This release has numerous bug fixes and maintenance updates. It also includes the corrected source code for the JK CVE-2007

Re: mod_jk 1.2.22-dev test

Well I may be the only one to work on mod_jk on iSeries :) 2007/3/12, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Henri Gomez wrote: > I'm tracking right now the iSeries problem (present in 1.2.20 and > 1.2.21) and it's located somewhere in jk_log() (jk_util.c). > That would be great, since only you repor

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41824] New: - Unable to use nested type in TLD

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat 5.5.23 released

On Today at 11:27am, FHDL=>Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FHDL> oh, uh, duh, I'm not very familiar with this one, besides it's very FHDL> intriguing dialog :) FHDL> I'll take a look at it, I guess it just wasn't fixed. FHDL> FHDL> Filip Synopsis seems to be that the "optional

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat 5.5.23 released

Hola, On 3/12/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wendy Smoak wrote: > Filip, did you see that the missing MailSessionFactory bug popped back > up in this one? > > I ran into it this morning, but by that time 40668 had already been > reopened. > > http://issues.apache.org/bugz

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat 5.5.23 released

On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 13:57 -0400, Yoav Shapira wrote: > > It's a build environment thing. Ya gots to have the JavaMail and > JavaActivationFramework jas on your build classpath (in whatever libs > directory you chose to use in build.properties), or the JNDI mail > session factory won't get built

Re: mod_jk 1.2.22-dev test

Great, I hope we can get that fixed! I can stall releasing 1.2.22, I think it's not that urgent. The point is, that I will be away app. for a week. Maybe Mladen or Jean-Frederic want to jump in. It's nice, that three of us can handle the jk release process. Keep us informed, how your investi

Tomcat 6.0.10 missing md5sum files

Hi, I was downloading TC 6.0.10 and noticed that the md5sum files are missing for that release. http://tomcat.apache.org/download-60.cgi Missing: http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-6/v6.0.10/bin/apache-tomcat-6.0.10.tar.gz.md5 -Dave --

Re: Tomcat 6.0.10 missing md5sum files

Hi, On 3/12/07, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I was downloading TC 6.0.10 and noticed that the md5sum files are missing for that release. It's my fault, I apologize. I'll try to fix it ASAP. Yoav - To unsubscri

Re: Tomcat 6.0.10 missing md5sum files

Hi, On 3/12/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/12/07, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I was downloading TC 6.0.10 and noticed that the md5sum files are > missing for that release. It's my fault, I apologize. I'll try to fix it ASAP. The files are there now, it w

Re: Tomcat 6.0.10 missing md5sum files

On 3/12/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/12/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/12/07, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was downloading TC 6.0.10 and noticed that the md5sum files are > > missing for that release. > > It's my fault, I apologize. I'll try

svn commit: r517384 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java

Author: fhanik Date: Mon Mar 12 13:37:22 2007 New Revision: 517384 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=517384 Log: Added in the skeleton for fairness logic, currently the tests for fairness are coming out extremely fair, could it be that the Selector.selectedKeys() sorts the keys pro

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41817] - tomcat 6.1.10 can't found the native be installed .

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 99] - Tomcat reports 'out of memory error' BugRat Report#89

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c

Contention in ApplicationContext.java in Tomcat 5.5

I'm running some performance tests on JBoss 4.0.5. I'm seeing some contention inside Tomcat on ApplicationContext.getAttribute(). With a load of 200 threads, I often see over 150 "waiting to lock" messages on the attributes object. It looks like this contention has already been fixed in Tomc

Re: Contention in ApplicationContext.java in Tomcat 5.5

Phillip Thurmond wrote: I'm running some performance tests on JBoss 4.0.5. I'm seeing some contention inside Tomcat on ApplicationContext.getAttribute(). With a load of 200 threads, I often see over 150 "waiting to lock" messages on the attributes object. It looks like this contention has al

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat 6.0.10 released

Tomcat 6.0.10 stable libraries, mavenized, can be found at: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository/ Filip Remy Maucherat wrote: The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache Tomcat 6.0.10 stable. This release is the first stable release of the 6.0.x branch. Apa

How to develop filter for tomcat ?

Hi, I am new for Tomcat. I have read througth the documents on web site. I could not find the answer. So I ask this questions here. On client, I aggregated some requests into a xml file and then post them to the server. I want to make a filter to enable those requests to be separate as they

Re: How to develop filter for tomcat ?

Questions about Servlet filters belong on the Tomcat user's list. This list is for people developing Tomcat itself, not people developing Servlets and related web application components. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 99] - Tomcat reports 'out of memory error' BugRat Report#89

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41817] - tomcat 6.1.10 can't found the native be installed .

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41827] New: - Not support SSI

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41828] New: - mod_jk file locking (flock) causes kernel panic

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu