DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41684] - Some URIs need to be adapted to the changed layout of the stock webapps, some files are missing

2007-03-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41809] - some jsp-examples are broken

2007-03-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r516900 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml

2007-03-11 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Sun Mar 11 06:28:47 2007 New Revision: 516900 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=516900 Log: Add changelog entries for r516561 and r516564 (both concerning changes to log messages). Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml Modifi

Draft Board report for March 2007

2007-03-11 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hola, We have to submit a report to the Board this month. Here's a draft, please comment if you've got changes or additions. I'd like to send it in around mid-week. Thanks, Yoav --- Begin Draft --- Apache Tomcat Board Report, March 2007 Summary: Tomcat is chugging along, with significant dev

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41757] - JK Apache HowTo documentation doesn't explain the --enable-prefork option of the configure script

2007-03-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41757] - JK Apache HowTo documentation doesn't explain the --enable-prefork option of the configure script

2007-03-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r516903 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs: miscellaneous/changelog.xml webserver_howto/apache.xml

2007-03-11 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Sun Mar 11 07:07:27 2007 New Revision: 516903 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=516903 Log: Fix Bugzilla 41757: Document the "--enable-prefork" flag of configure. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml tomcat/connectors/tru

svn commit: r516904 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk: native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml

2007-03-11 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Sun Mar 11 07:17:00 2007 New Revision: 516904 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=516904 Log: - Use the full description string ap_get_server_description() instead of the truncated info from ap_get_server_banner(), because this info gets used internally (status work

svn commit: r516907 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk: native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml

2007-03-11 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Sun Mar 11 07:24:01 2007 New Revision: 516907 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=516907 Log: Replace APR precompiler directive by httpd mpm_query to detect MPM threading. Add an info log message about auto-detected pool size. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/j

svn commit: r516910 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native: apache-1.3/mod_jk.c apache-2.0/mod_jk.c

2007-03-11 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Sun Mar 11 07:34:51 2007 New Revision: 516910 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=516910 Log: Make source format for apr_log_* args more consistent, to make consistency checks of argument usage easier. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-1.3/mod_j

svn commit: r516911 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native: apache-1.3/mod_jk.c apache-2.0/mod_jk.c

2007-03-11 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Sun Mar 11 07:49:18 2007 New Revision: 516911 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=516911 Log: - Add STDERR logging to jk_error_exit() - Increase log level for message about using default shm file and log file to warning - remove deprecated APLOG_NOERRNO for 2.0/2.2

svn commit: r516916 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native: apache-1.3/mod_jk.c apache-2.0/mod_jk.c

2007-03-11 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Sun Mar 11 08:03:10 2007 New Revision: 516916 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=516916 Log: - simplify logic for shm open error log message - make code betwenn apache 1.3 and 2.0 more consistent around wc_open() - add a better log message, in case wc_open() fails

svn commit: r516917 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c

2007-03-11 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Sun Mar 11 08:06:24 2007 New Revision: 516917 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=516917 Log: Use jk return values for init_jk(), because it's not part of httpd API. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c Modified: tomcat/connectors/tru

svn commit: r516922 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk: native/apache-1.3/mod_jk.c native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml

2007-03-11 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Sun Mar 11 08:17:44 2007 New Revision: 516922 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=516922 Log: - Delete unused check for empty init_map during startup. - Bugzilla 41770: Fix startup error if no JkWorkersFile is used. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/ap

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41770] - JkWorkerProperties broken in mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-03-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Should we release mod_jk 1.2.21.1 or 1.2.22?

2007-03-11 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi, since the security release has been bundled with a feature release we ran into an unfortunate small bug in the newly implemented nice check for allowed attributes in the property files. BZ 41770 describes the problem. I fixed it and I'm thinking about releasing this as either 1.2.21.1 or

Re: Should we release mod_jk 1.2.21.1 or 1.2.22?

2007-03-11 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: What's the preferred solution? [ ] Try to improve the header files for a 1.2.21.1 [X] Simply release 1.2.22 [ ] Don't release at all, wait for more fixes or features before releasing. Regards, Mladen. -

Re: Should we release mod_jk 1.2.21.1 or 1.2.22?

2007-03-11 Thread Guenter Knauf
> [ ] Try to improve the header files for a 1.2.21.1 > [x] Simply release 1.2.22 > [ ] Don't release at all, wait for more fixes or features before > releasing. Guenter. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: Should we release mod_jk 1.2.21.1 or 1.2.22?

2007-03-11 Thread Henri Gomez
1.2.22 2007/3/11, Guenter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [ ] Try to improve the header files for a 1.2.21.1 > [x] Simply release 1.2.22 > [ ] Don't release at all, wait for more fixes or features before > releasing. Guenter. -

Re: Tomcat 6 Scales

2007-03-11 Thread Henri Gomez
2007/3/11, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Great work - but I'm curious, wouldn't be better to explore the alternative direction - i.e. detect when the server is too loaded and send a quick 502 ? Maybe with some extra logic - like serve existing sessions first, provide some notifications t

Re: Should we release mod_jk 1.2.21.1 or 1.2.22?

2007-03-11 Thread Mark Thomas
Rainer Jung wrote: > [ ] Try to improve the header files for a 1.2.21.1 > [X] Simply release 1.2.22 > [ ] Don't release at all, wait for more fixes or features before releasing. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fo

May Chun Chew/FEA/PEC is out of the office.

2007-03-11 Thread May Chun Chew
I will be out of the office starting 03/12/2007 and will not return until 03/19/2007. For urgent matters, pls contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: (65)63629408. I am also Contactable at (65)97876648. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Tomcat 6 Scales

2007-03-11 Thread Costin Manolache
Yes, 100 concurent requests is a sign you need lb - serving 1000 on one server is a false problem in most cases. I would rather have a server smartly reject requests and notify a lb rather then degrading all requests by accepting more than it can handle properly. Try adding a database access or s

svn commit: r517094 - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/index.html xdocs/index.xml

2007-03-11 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Sun Mar 11 21:29:30 2007 New Revision: 517094 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=517094 Log: Update front page to latest 5.5.x version Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/index.xml Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat 5.5.23 released

2007-03-11 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 3/9/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache Tomcat 5.5.23 stable. This release has numerous bug fixes and maintenance updates. It also includes the corrected source code for the JK CVE-2007-0774 issue. Filip

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41817] New: - tomcat 6.1.10 can't found the native be installed .

2007-03-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 99] - Tomcat reports 'out of memory error' BugRat Report#89

2007-03-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c

Re: Tomcat 6 Scales

2007-03-11 Thread Mladen Turk
Costin Manolache wrote: Yes, 100 concurent requests is a sign you need lb - serving 1000 on Sometimes it is desired to have the capability of serving 1000 concurrent connections (not requests). The typical situation is when the frontend server is used for delivering a static content with higher

Bug report for Tomcat 3 [2007/03/11]

2007-03-11 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2007/03/11]

2007-03-11 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Watchdog [2007/03/11]

2007-03-11 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 5 [2007/03/11]

2007-03-11 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned