Re: Debugging Apache/mod_jk (worker) fault on AIX

2007-03-06 Thread Tim Whittington
We've seen broken mod_jk builds with xlc_r in our environments. cc_r builds seems to work fine though. I haven't dug into what the issue is though. tim >>> On 6/03/2007 at 8:35 a.m., in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Wertman >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Actually I started with xlc_r and it

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41770] New: - JkWorkerProperties broken in mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Two questions about SemaphoreValve support for filtering (bug # 41679)

2007-03-06 Thread Scott Marlow
For Bug # 41679, I attached the current code changes that I am using to apply SemaphoreValve to different parts of my application based on url filtering or header field value. Certain "resource expensive" parts of the application are allowed a smaller number of users to access concurrently tha

Re: Two questions about SemaphoreValve support for filtering (bug # 41679)

2007-03-06 Thread Remy Maucherat
Scott Marlow wrote: For Bug # 41679, I attached the current code changes that I am using to apply SemaphoreValve to different parts of my application based on url filtering or header field value. Certain "resource expensive" parts of the application are allowed a smaller number of users to acc

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.23 - Take 2

2007-03-06 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Mar 5, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Due to a recent screw up, my binaries didn't match the tag in SVN. This has been corrected. A new build has been run from the tag, the TCK tests have all been run and passed. Candidate binaries are available here: http://people.ap

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41770] - JkWorkerProperties broken in mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Two questions about SemaphoreValve support for filtering (bug # 41679)

2007-03-06 Thread Scott Marlow
I don't see how a request going through a Valve can be "already throttled", as requests are supposed to go through a valve only once. Can you give an example ? (maybe multiple valves in a row like what is suggested below ?) Valves only accept the concrete Request class, no wrapping allowed.

Re: Two questions about SemaphoreValve support for filtering (bug # 41679)

2007-03-06 Thread Remy Maucherat
Scott Marlow wrote: I didn't want a single request to consume Semaphore permits from more than one SemaphoreValve. I'm not sure about that, since for example the last valve could be more restrictive than the first one, etc. It seems more logical to me to consume one permit from each valve sin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41770] - JkWorkerProperties broken in mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41770] - JkWorkerProperties broken in mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Two questions about SemaphoreValve support for filtering (bug # 41679)

2007-03-06 Thread Scott Marlow
Remy Maucherat wrote: Scott Marlow wrote: I didn't want a single request to consume Semaphore permits from more than one SemaphoreValve. I'm not sure about that, since for example the last valve could be more restrictive than the first one, etc. It seems more logical to me to consume one per

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41772] New: - Brand new HttpServletResponse is already committed.

2007-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41772] - Brand new HttpServletResponse is already committed.

2007-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41770] - JkWorkerProperties broken in mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41770] - JkWorkerProperties broken in mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41770] - JkWorkerProperties broken in mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41773] New: - DefaultServlet doesn't set correct content type

2007-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31201] - Encoding bug when using action

2007-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41772] - HttpServletResponse is already committed.

2007-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41775] New: - Classes are not loaded from ${catalina.base}/lib

2007-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41772] - HttpServletResponse is already committed.

2007-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41773] - DefaultServlet doesn't set correct content type

2007-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41775] - Classes are not loaded from ${catalina.base}/lib

2007-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41770] - JkWorkerProperties broken in mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-03-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r515355 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk: native/common/jk_util.c xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml

2007-03-06 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Tue Mar 6 15:25:38 2007 New Revision: 515355 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=515355 Log: Add local_worker and friends to the list of deprecated and the list of supported attributes. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_util.c tomcat/con