svn commit: r506431 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/FormAuthenticator.java

Author: remm Date: Mon Feb 12 04:18:34 2007 New Revision: 506431 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=506431 Log: - Fix minor glitch, submitted by Anil Saldhana. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/FormAuthenticator.java Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/

svn commit: r506433 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/FormAuthenticator.java

Author: markt Date: Mon Feb 12 04:29:23 2007 New Revision: 506433 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=506433 Log: Port fix for minor glitch, submitted by Anil Saldhana. Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/FormAuthenticator.java

Re: svn commit: r506433 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/FormAuthenticator.java

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: markt Date: Mon Feb 12 04:29:23 2007 New Revision: 506433 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=506433 Log: Port fix for minor glitch, submitted by Anil Saldhana. That's fast. I don't think it fixes anything (the test is supposed to return true, unles

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40775] - Single-sign on session invalidation not working as expected

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40775] - Single-sign on session invalidation not working as expected

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Weekly builds

Hi, Since Tomcat 6 is still not stable, I propose producing a weekly Monday build, starting with one today. Comments ? Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Weekly builds

Hi, Generally speaking, if the release manager (you in this case) is OK with doing the work, I'd say sure, why not? Let's just label the build clearly as a weekly or with a specific date, so that people don't confuse it for a voted-upon / SVN-tagged official build. Yoav On 2/12/07, Remy Maucher

Re: Weekly builds

Does this mean bringing back the automated builds? +1 to automated weekly builds -0 to manual weekly builds -Tim Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, Since Tomcat 6 is still not stable, I propose producing a weekly Monday build, starting with one today. -

Re: Weekly builds

Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, Generally speaking, if the release manager (you in this case) is OK with doing the work, I'd say sure, why not? Let's just label the build clearly as a weekly or with a specific date, so that people don't confuse it for a voted-upon / SVN-tagged official build. All buil

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39711] - WebappLoader checkInterval documentation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Weekly builds

Hi, On 2/12/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All builds would follow the release process described here: 1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6 Ah, ok. If we can turn these around weekly, that'd be awesome. +1. I would caution th

Re: Weekly builds

I would love to see a stable 6.0.x =) Tomcat 6.0.9 is stable for my usage. But, I'm not using facelets and others recents goodies, so my concern will be in which area Tomcat 6 is unstable ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

Re: Weekly builds

On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 11:04 -0500, Yoav Shapira wrote: > > I would caution that for some builds, you won't be able to get enough > honest +1s because people won't have time to test in the given weekly > window. But I would be glad to be wrong on this one, and we'll cross > that bridge if/when we g

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41595] New: - java.io.NotSerializableException: org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.PoolingDataSource$PoolGuardConnectionWrapper

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Building the Jasper compiler

Could I ask again for a reference to instructions on how to build the Jasper compiler? The Building.txt that comes with it does not work for me (Win2K, jdk 1.5, ant 1.7.0). Or, would you let me know if it is not possible to build the Jasper compiler except through the Tomcat build? I have bee

Re: Weekly builds

On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 17:32 +0100, Henri Gomez wrote: > > I would love to see a stable 6.0.x =) > > Tomcat 6.0.9 is stable for my usage. 6.0.x all have been stable for me, but I don't use many advanced features, and no frame works atm. > But, I'm not using facelets and others recents goodies, so

Re: Building the Jasper compiler

On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 10:21 -0800, M Coffee wrote: > Could I ask again for a reference to instructions on how to build the > Jasper compiler? The Building.txt that comes with it does not work > for me (Win2K, jdk 1.5, ant 1.7.0). It's not going to be on windows, but on Gentoo we will have a tomca

Re: Building the Jasper compiler

William, Thanks for responding. This explains why I couldn't find an independent build process for Jasper. So I'll continue patching the jar, and wait for the development you do on Gentoo. If you do any work on the Jasper compiler, please think about addressing the problem of getting reasona

Re: Tagging 5.5.22

ok, without internet for a few days, but back in the game. I plan to tag 5.5.22 Noon CST tomorrow Feb 12th, Filip Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: This afternoon, 3pm CST. If you don't see the tag means my internet has been disconnected as today is the day we are moving, and in that case, I'll re

Re: Building the Jasper compiler

On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 13:16 -0800, M Coffee wrote: > William, > > Thanks for responding. No problem. > This explains why I couldn't find an independent build process for > Jasper. So I'll continue patching the jar, and wait for the > development you do on Gentoo. I will try to remember to sho

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32017] - Tomcat 5.5 manager fails to undeploy Struts app

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41577] - images under ssl fail to load

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Building the Jasper compiler

William, > > This explains why I couldn't find an independent build process for > > Jasper. So I'll continue patching the jar, and wait for the > > development you do on Gentoo. > > I will try to remember to shoot you a heads up when I do. It will be the > build.xml that you want. But really th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41577] - images under ssl fail to load

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Building the Jasper compiler

On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 14:04 -0800, M Coffee wrote: > > There is a jasper build.xml, but it doesn't build the jars without a > complete Tomcat build environment (and possibly an older version of > Ant), so I stopped working on debugging that one. There's no > documentation for it either -- the code

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41580] - Avoid invoking ByteChunk.getLength repeatedly in loops

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41595] - java.io.NotSerializableException: org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.PoolingDataSource$PoolGuardConnectionWrapper

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Weekly builds

Yoav Shapira wrote: I've been OK with releasing at least one 6.0 build (6.0.9, and also one of the earlier ones IIRC) as Stable. I think it's ready. I've actually been kind of curious why some of the votes have only called for alpha/beta designation, without giving Stable as an option. I thin

svn commit: r506784 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Author: remm Date: Mon Feb 12 17:00:51 2007 New Revision: 506784 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=506784 Log: - Changelog update. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/view

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41595] - java.io.NotSerializableException: org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.PoolingDataSource$PoolGuardConnectionWrapper

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32017] - Tomcat 5.5 manager fails to undeploy Struts app

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41580] - Avoid invoking ByteChunk.getLength repeatedly in loops

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu