Re: svn commit: r502649 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h

Something like: +++ [[#ifdef HAVE_SYS_SOCKETVAR_H # include #endif ]]) AC_CHECK_HEADERS([sys/select.h], [], [], [[#ifdef HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H # include #endif ]]) +++ helps for sys/socketvar.h Should we have macros for that? Cheers Jean-Frederic On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 18:36 +0100, Rainer Jung wro

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41538] New: - Unable to run Tomcat as a Windows service under JDK 1.6

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41539] New: - NullPointerException during Embedded tomcat restart

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

+1 -Tim Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x: 1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6 2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing 3. wait 2-3 days for testing 4. call for alpha/beta/st

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41540] New: - ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [12259], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41541] New: - ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [12259], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Let's get 5.5.21 out the door...

On Feb 3, 2007, at 2:38 PM, Ted Husted wrote: Or, 1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6 2. call for alpha/beta/stable vote on build 3. wait 72 hours 4. if 3 +1's and more +1s than -1s, publish previously created tarball and binaries to www.apac

Re: [VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

+1 On 2/4/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x: 1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6 2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing 3. wait 2-3 days for testing 4.

Re: svn commit: r502649 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h

It sounds as though the problem is that even though the header exists under HPUX, it is unusable. So we may still need to explicit HPUX test... I'll review the autoconf stuff to see if we can force undef'ing the HAVE_* for HPUX. On Feb 5, 2007, at 2:52 AM, Jean-Frederic wrote: Hi, I have test

Re: [VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

On Feb 4, 2007, at 3:41 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x: 1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6 2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing 3. wait 2-3 days for testing 4. c

Re: [VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

Hola, On 2/4/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x: 1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6 2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing 3. wait 2-3 days for testing

Tagging 5.5.21

Tuesday Feb 6th, 10am CST - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x: 1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6 2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing 3. wait 2-3 days for testing 4. call for alpha/beta/stable vote

Re: [VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

+1 Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x: 1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6 2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing 3. wait 2-3 days for testing 4. call for alpha/beta/stable v

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41540] - ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [12259], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41541] - ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [12259], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41541] - ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [12259], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x: 1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6 2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing 3. wait 2-3 days for testing 4. call for alpha/beta/stable vote

May Chun Chew/FEA/PEC is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 02/06/2007 and will not return until 02/07/2007. Contactable at (65)97876648. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[VOTE] Release build 6.0.9

Candidate binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.9/ According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.9 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-ma

svn commit: r503957 - in /tomcat: connectors/trunk/http11/ connectors/trunk/jk/ connectors/trunk/util/ container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/ container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/ container/branches/tc4.1

Author: markt Date: Mon Feb 5 18:18:14 2007 New Revision: 503957 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=503957 Log: Make connectors build for TC4 with a 1.3 JDK. Some bits will be excluded from the build but it will then run on a 1.3 JDK. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/bui

svn commit: r503958 - in /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x: BUILDING.txt RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt RUNNING.txt build.properties.default build.xml

Author: markt Date: Mon Feb 5 18:21:15 2007 New Revision: 503958 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=503958 Log: Update libraries to latest available versions. Update release notes to make JDK 1.3 requirement clear. This has been the case for several versions, it just wasn't clearly s

svn commit: r503965 - /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationFilterChain.java

Author: markt Date: Mon Feb 5 18:51:30 2007 New Revision: 503965 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=503965 Log: Fix what looks like a copy and paste error Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationFilterChain.java Modifie

Processing result of mod_jk for Apache2.0.x is unexpected, differs from the one for Apache1.3.x.

Hi, I'm using Apache2.0.59, mod_jk1.2.20 and Tomcat5.0.28. The resources are located in the area where is protected by Tomcat's BASIC authentication. When I send a request via HEAD method without account nor password, the values of response headers are not recorded into the Apache2's access log fi

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.9

It'd be good to get a public update out there to run the new JSF releases as part of JEE 5 (I realize this is at the bottom of most other's priorities). Remy Maucherat wrote: Candidate binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.9/ According to the (slightly) up