svn commit: r501763 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_jni_worker.c

Author: mturk Date: Wed Jan 31 00:27:06 2007 New Revision: 501763 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=501763 Log: JNI_VERSION_1_6 if defined is missing the JDK1_1InitArgs. Make sure it at least compiles by ifdefing the code. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_jni

svn commit: r501764 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_jni_worker.c

Author: mturk Date: Wed Jan 31 00:30:50 2007 New Revision: 501764 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=501764 Log: Add empty worker factory for jni worker in case Java6 is detected. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_jni_worker.c Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk

svn commit: r501766 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c

Author: mturk Date: Wed Jan 31 00:36:57 2007 New Revision: 501766 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=501766 Log: Backport filter notification from JK2 where we had an option to specify the auth_complete. Fixes Bz #36365. The patch does not like proposed detect IIS 5.1 but rather adds r

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36365] - IIS5.1-isapi_redirector.dll (1.2.14) plugin issue

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r501770 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c

Author: mturk Date: Wed Jan 31 00:56:12 2007 New Revision: 501770 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=501770 Log: Small fix. Detect auth notification inside initialize_extension and after the config is read Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c Modifie

svn commit: r501771 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c

Author: mturk Date: Wed Jan 31 00:57:38 2007 New Revision: 501771 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=501771 Log: Oops. Working on multiple SVN repositories can lead to a real mess :) Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c Modified: tomcat/connectors/tru

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41504] New: - Illegal access: this web application instance has been stopped already

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38489] - Frequent Broken Pipe Error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38489] - Frequent Broken Pipe Error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41506] New: - Illegal access: this web application instance has been stopped already

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41507] New: - Illegal access: this web application instance has been stopped already

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[OT] Problems with [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi, Few days ago I changed my email address for Tomcat Users List with standard unsubscribe/subscribe, and although I can receive messages, send messages, I cannot see the messages send by me. (mladen_dot_turk_at_gmail_dot_com) It looks others can see the messages I sent. They are even listed on

Configuring TOMCAT APACHE 5.5.9 to MULTI APPLICATION

Hello, I would like to know what are the changing to do in the configuration files (and which files are they ?) of the TOMCAT APACHE 5.5.9 to make it enable to multi-application work, so more than one application can use the same instance of the APACHE. In advance, thank you. Best regards Mar

Re: [OT] Problems with [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi, > > Few days ago I changed my email address for Tomcat Users List > with standard unsubscribe/subscribe, and although I can receive > messages, send messages, I cannot see the messages send by me. > (mladen_dot_turk_at_gmail_dot_com) > > It looks others can see the messag

Re: [OT] Problems with [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi, I've had something similar happen with GMail on several occassions. It tries to be smart and see if sender address = your address, and in that case not show "duplicates" in your inbox. To test, try sending a message to the list from another address, e.g. your apache.org one, or another mail c

Re: Configuring TOMCAT APACHE 5.5.9 to MULTI APPLICATION

Guershon Marc wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to know what are the changing to do in the configuration > files (and which files are they ?) of the TOMCAT APACHE 5.5.9 to make > it enable to multi-application work, > so more than one application can use the same instance of the APACHE. This is

Re: Configuring TOMCAT APACHE 5.5.9 to MULTI APPLICATION

Marc, This question is better targeted at our users list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please post followup messages, if any, there. In short, the answer is nothing: Tomcat will run multiple webapps out of the box. Just drop different WAR files in the webapps directory, and off you go. A good document to

Re: [OT] Problems with [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks Mark and Yoav! As I suspected, it is a 'trivial feature' of gmail :) Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41509] New: - Jasper tries to add permissions to readonly PermissionCollection

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40719] - Tomcat 5.5.20 Internal error/crash

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38713] - java.io.IOException: tmpFile.renameTo(classFile) failed when compiling new JSP (upon redeploy)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

FYI: jk 1.2.20 core on iSeries v5R3

Hi to all, I built and installed the jk 1.2.20 on iSeries i5/OS V5R3 Apache 2 server to replace the previous 1.2.19. And it core with this stack trace : User Trace Dump for job 421305/QTMHHTTP/APACHEDFT. Size: 300K, Wrapped 1 times. --- 01/27/2007 23:52:06 --- 00E7:485816 Stack: QH

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41502] - WebappClassLoader concurrency problem defining packages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: FYI: jk 1.2.20 core on iSeries v5R3

Henri Gomez wrote: Hi to all, I built and installed the jk 1.2.20 on iSeries i5/OS V5R3 Apache 2 server to replace the previous 1.2.19. Think there was some problem with wrong printf format. Rainer fixed that post 1.2.20, but he should know better. Regards, Mladen. -

Re: FYI: jk 1.2.20 core on iSeries v5R3

Thanks. Did the 1.2.21 is expected soon or should I use the trunk ? 2007/1/31, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Henri Gomez wrote: > Hi to all, > > I built and installed the jk 1.2.20 on iSeries i5/OS V5R3 Apache 2 > server to replace the previous 1.2.19. > Think there was some problem with wr

Re: 5.5.21?

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: IMHO, it is due, last version was september 30th...! thanks for your opinion :) we'll get the ball rolling. I have a move pending, we are going from Texas to Colorado, so I'll try to squeeze this in there as well Filip You've picked a bad year. We've had 57

Re: 5.5.21?

George Sexton wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: IMHO, it is due, last version was september 30th...! thanks for your opinion :) we'll get the ball rolling. I have a move pending, we are going from Texas to Colorado, so I'll try to squeeze this in there as well Filip You've picked a ba

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41512] New: - 5.5.20 RELEASE-NOTES has unreplaced @VERSION@

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: FYI: jk 1.2.20 core on iSeries v5R3

Hi Henri, there have been two bug fixes concerning string formatting, which have core dump potential. Both only occur with log level info or above. I think they are *not* the reason (see below). The code is in common/jk_ajp_common.c: 1) Wrong order of arguments; should only be relevant, if n

Re: 5.5.21?

George Sexton wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: IMHO, it is due, last version was september 30th...! thanks for your opinion :) we'll get the ball rolling. I have a move pending, we are going from Texas to Colorado, so I'll try to squeeze this in there as well Filip You've picked a

Re: FYI: jk 1.2.20 core on iSeries v5R3

Sorry to jump in, I'm new here. I started watching this list because of a problem I'm having with the mod_jk 1.2.20 as well. I'm not getting core files, but I do have problems that I can't reproduce at log level trace or debug. I'm running it on AIX 5.3 (ml05). I compiled the apache 2.2.4 a

Re: FYI: jk 1.2.20 core on iSeries v5R3

2007/1/31, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Henri, there have been two bug fixes concerning string formatting, which have core dump potential. Both only occur with log level info or above. I think they are *not* the reason (see below). The code is in common/jk_ajp_common.c: 1) Wrong order of

Re: FYI: jk 1.2.20 core on iSeries v5R3

Hi Eric, maybe your observation is in fact related to Henri's, since you also get core dumps (segmentation faults), which is quite unusual. See further comments inline. Eric Wertman wrote: Sorry to jump in, I'm new here. I started watching this list because of a problem I'm having with the

svn commit: r502042 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Validator.java

Author: remm Date: Wed Jan 31 15:31:39 2007 New Revision: 502042 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=502042 Log: - No functional change: deferred is always true when elExpression is true. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Validator.java Modified: tomca

svn commit: r502046 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps: ROOT/index.html docs/changelog.xml

Author: remm Date: Wed Jan 31 15:45:03 2007 New Revision: 502046 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=502046 Log: - Changelog update. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/ROOT/index.html tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/RO

Re: FYI: jk 1.2.20 core on iSeries v5R3

Connector: maxThreads="800" minThreads="100" bufferSize="8192" backlog="256" /> I've tried all sorts of permutations of this... None of the values make much difference. My ab test is -n 1000 -c 200. --- workers.properties: # PlatformServer worker.Platf

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41502] - WebappClassLoader concurrency problem defining packages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Please remind me why context path for XML descriptors is coded to file name?

Hi, I know we've talked about this before and resolved Bugzilla items related to this, but I'd like to be reminded, please. Why does the following code exist as such? In org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/ca

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41507] - Illegal access: this web application instance has been stopped already

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41504] - Illegal access: this web application instance has been stopped already

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41506] - Illegal access: this web application instance has been stopped already

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41504] - Illegal access: this web application instance has been stopped already

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41504] - Illegal access: this web application instance has been stopped already

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r502060 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_9/

Author: remm Date: Wed Jan 31 16:39:00 2007 New Revision: 502060 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=502060 Log: - As discussed, 6.0.9 tag. Added: tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_9/ - copied from r502059, tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41337] - Display an error page if no cert is available on CLIENT-CERT login

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Please remind me why context path for XML descriptors is coded to file name?

hmm, that's how I thought it worked, the filename would only be used if the "path" attribute was not present inside the XML file. Filip Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, I know we've talked about this before and resolved Bugzilla items related to this, but I'd like to be reminded, please. Why does the

svn commit: r502062 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/jkstatus/src/share/org/apache/jk/status/JkStatusTask.java

Author: markt Date: Wed Jan 31 16:59:17 2007 New Revision: 502062 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=502062 Log: Fix build. I believe I implemented the intended behaviour. Rainer - can you confirm? Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/jkstatus/src/share/org/apache/jk/status/JkSt

Re: Please remind me why context path for XML descriptors is coded to file name?

Yoav Shapira wrote: This code results in the (correctly documented at http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/context.html, but annoying) behavior that users deploying web applications from conf/Catalina/localhost/appname.xml context files can't set a path for their context. Instead, the

svn commit: r502067 - in /tomcat: build/tc5.5.x/build.xml container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Author: markt Date: Wed Jan 31 17:30:32 2007 New Revision: 502067 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=502067 Log: Fix bug 41512. Replace @version@ token in release notes. Modified: tomcat/build/tc5.5.x/build.xml tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Modified: tom

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41512] - 5.5.20 RELEASE-NOTES has unreplaced @VERSION@

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38740] - (5.5.15) session attributes set in sessionCreated not synched

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41513] New: - JSP examples don't work and don't display source

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: FYI: jk 1.2.20 core on iSeries v5R3

Eric Wertman wrote: Connector: JkWorkersFile conf/workers.properties JkShmFile logs/mod_jk.shm JkShmSize 8192 This is 8MB of shared memory. Are you sure you have 1 workers? JkLogFile logs/mod_jk.log JkLogLeveldebug Segmentation fault in sig_coredump at 0x10037590 0x1

Re: svn commit: r502062 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/jkstatus/src/share/org/apache/jk/status/JkStatusTask.java

Yes, thanks mark. I didn't build it, because I told Peter about the changes and he needs to do some cleanup for the jkstatus ant taks any ways. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: markt Date: Wed Jan 31 16:59:17 2007 New Revision: 502062 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=502062 Log: