DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40719] - Tomcat 5.5.20 Internal error/crash

2006-12-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Tagging tomcat-native 1.1.8

2006-12-11 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, I'll tag the 1.1.8 later today and put the distro files in regular places, so they can be used for Tomcat builds. BTW, can we again consider to use the minimum version required to that version (1.1.8). Although the API is compatible with 1.1.3 version, the all versions between 1.1.3 and 1.1.

Tomcat 6.0.5 and tcnative 1.1.8 ?

2006-12-11 Thread Henri Gomez
Hi to all, There are some problems with tcnative and I see today some fixes in Tomcat and tcnative. Should we expect a release of Tomcat 6 and tcnative in the next days ? Regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: Tagging tomcat-native 1.1.8

2006-12-11 Thread Henri Gomez
+1 2006/12/11, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi, I'll tag the 1.1.8 later today and put the distro files in regular places, so they can be used for Tomcat builds. BTW, can we again consider to use the minimum version required to that version (1.1.8). Although the API is compatible with 1.1.

Re: Support for JAAS credentials

2006-12-11 Thread Shivaraj Tenginakai
I have an outline implementation, that by extending FormAuthenticator, allows for (more) complete JAAS support in Tomcat. From what I can tell using Google, it could be useful for others too. I would appreciate, if I can be pointed towards the RFC process, for gauging the usefulness of the change

Re: Tomcat 6.0.5 and tcnative 1.1.8 ?

2006-12-11 Thread Remy Maucherat
Henri Gomez wrote: Hi to all, There are some problems with tcnative and I see today some fixes in Tomcat and tcnative. Should we expect a release of Tomcat 6 and tcnative in the next days ? I understand you have a problem. However, can you try to stop flooding when that happens ? Rémy ---

Re: Tagging tomcat-native 1.1.8

2006-12-11 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, I'll tag the 1.1.8 later today and put the distro files in regular places, so they can be used for Tomcat builds. BTW, can we again consider to use the minimum version required to that version (1.1.8). Although the API is compatible with 1.1.3 version, the all versions be

Re: Support for JAAS credentials

2006-12-11 Thread Mark Thomas
Shivaraj Tenginakai wrote: > I have an outline implementation, that by extending FormAuthenticator, > allows for (more) complete JAAS support in Tomcat. From what I can tell > using Google, it could be useful for others too. > > I would appreciate, if I can be pointed towards the RFC process, for

Re: Tagging tomcat-native 1.1.8

2006-12-11 Thread Mladen Turk
Remy Maucherat wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: My little tweak will most likely be ported back to 5.5.x. As a result, when you install a new build, you'll get a warning, and the code will not use the problematic method by default. As a result, the forced upgrade is a waste of time for most. OK.

Re: Tomcat 6.0.5 and tcnative 1.1.8 ?

2006-12-11 Thread Jess Holle
Just an note: We're also having odd problems with tcnative -- but on 5.5.20... All problems disappear without tcnative enabled, but performance suffers... -- Jess Holle Remy Maucherat wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Hi to all, There are some problems with tcnative and I see today some fixes in To

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40719] - Tomcat 5.5.20 Internal error/crash

2006-12-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Tagging tomcat-native 1.1.8

2006-12-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Dec 11, 2006, at 5:00 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, I'll tag the 1.1.8 later today and put the distro files in regular places, so they can be used for Tomcat builds. BTW, can we again consider to use the minimum version required to that version (1.1.8). Although the API is compatible with 1.1

Re: Tagging tomcat-native 1.1.8

2006-12-11 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mladen Turk wrote: So I am against this plan. I've stated my position already: unless there's an API change that was needed, the minimum version number should not be upgraded. Also fine. The problem we have is the 1.1.5 that eats the CPU. The 1.1.3 as minimum means that any version up to rec

svn commit: r485793 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/java/org/apache/jk: common/ChannelSocket.java common/JkInputStream.java core/JkHandler.java core/MsgContext.java

2006-12-11 Thread pero
Author: pero Date: Mon Dec 11 10:28:58 2006 New Revision: 485793 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=485793 Log: Add a packetSize option to match the option. Backport from Tomcat 6.0.x Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/java/org/apache/jk/common/ChannelSocket.java tomcat/conn

svn commit: r485795 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2006-12-11 Thread pero
Author: pero Date: Mon Dec 11 10:30:02 2006 New Revision: 485795 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=485795 Log: Add a packetSize option to standard ajp jk handler Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changel

jk 1.2.20 release candidate: Windows Binaries available

2006-12-11 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi, Mladen Turk provided Windows Binaries for win32 (Apache mod_jk, IIS isapi plugin and Netscape nsapi plugin) and for win64 (AMD+IA64 isapi plugin): http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries Thanks Mladen and happy testing to everybody. Regards, Rainer ---

Re: Tagging tomcat-native 1.1.8

2006-12-11 Thread Peter Rossbach
Hi I have test to compile apr at mac os x 10.4..8 intel and get following warning: /bin/sh /Users/peter/develop/tools/local/tomcat55//build-1/libtool -- silent --mode=compile gcc -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DDARWIN - DSIGPROCMASK_SETS_THREAD_MASK -no-cpp-precomp -g -O2 - DHAVE_OPENSSL -I

Re: Tagging tomcat-native 1.1.8

2006-12-11 Thread David Rees
On 12/11/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyhow, this should at least be clearly documented if not enforced. There's no changelog for native that I could find, which should be fixed. +1 for that, I was looking for a tc-native changelog a while back to figure out if I need to be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37084] - JspC from ant fails on JSPs that use custom taglib

2006-12-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37084] - JspC from ant fails on JSPs that use custom taglib

2006-12-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r486005 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x: catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector/Request.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session/PersistentManagerBase.java webapps/docs

2006-12-11 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Mon Dec 11 19:45:59 2006 New Revision: 486005 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=486005 Log: Fix bug 40551. When restoring a session from a PersistentManager to w new node update the session Id with the new jvmRoute. Based on a patch by Chris Chandler. Modified:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40551] - Sticky sessions using PersistentManager enter indeterminate state on node failover

2006-12-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41152] New: - jre6

2006-12-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41153] New: - Reg: Tomcat start up

2006-12-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu