Re: svn commit: r477251 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/Response.java

2006-11-21 Thread Remy Maucherat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: fhanik Date: Mon Nov 20 08:47:03 2006 New Revision: 477251 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=477251 Log: TCK correction, depending on the sequence of the tests, the converter turns out to be null at certain times. Added in a check to create the conv

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40877] - JK1 and IIS6: Problem with multithreading / shared memory

2006-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41007] - Can't define customized 503 error page

2006-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r477127 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/scripts/build/instdso.sh

2006-11-21 Thread jfclere
Author: jfclere Date: Mon Nov 20 01:59:36 2006 New Revision: 477127 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=477127 Log: Oops. The files should not be removed. Other for example make install will fail. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/scripts/build/instdso.sh Modified: tomca

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41008] New: - POST request ignores command line parameters

2006-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41011] New: - duplicate class definition error when JSPs loaded from multiple threads

2006-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

2006-11-21 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
I'd prefer a 6.0.3, also due to a bug fix in the NIO connector (not picking up keystore password properly, or was this 6.0.1), but I'm not gonna hold back the 6.0.2 going beta by any means. Filip Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: My alpha vote stands, there are a few bug f

Re: [Proposal] Change in behaviour of uriworkermap.properties

2006-11-21 Thread Jean-frederic Clere
On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 06:52 +0100, Mladen Turk wrote: > Rainer Jung wrote: > > > > E.g. if one empties the uriworkermap.properties, reloading it does not > > change the internal mount list. Temporarily adding and later removing an > > entry will not remove the entry. > > That's the entire point.

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

2006-11-21 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: My alpha vote stands, there are a few bug fixes I added to 6.0.2: -output stream using the C2B converter It is not a regression, the same code (and associated minor issue) exists in 5.5. -ApplicationDispatcher.checkSameObjects wasn't checking the root of the r

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

2006-11-21 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: I'd prefer a 6.0.3, also due to a bug fix in the NIO connector (not picking up keystore password properly, or was this 6.0.1), but I'm not gonna hold back the 6.0.2 going beta by any means. Ok, but releasing a 6.0.3 as a beta would take about 10 more days, and t

Re: [Proposal] Change in behaviour of uriworkermap.properties

2006-11-21 Thread Rainer Jung
Jean-frederic Clere schrieb: > On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 06:52 +0100, Mladen Turk wrote: >> Rainer Jung wrote: >>> E.g. if one empties the uriworkermap.properties, reloading it does not >>> change the internal mount list. Temporarily adding and later removing an >>> entry will not remove the entry. >>

Re: findAncestorWithClass in a tag, used in a tag-file

2006-11-21 Thread Michiel Meeuwissen
Michiel Meeuwissen wrote: > Hello. > > I notice that in tomcat 5.5.20, in contradiction to tomcat 5.5.17, the > findAncestorWithClass method of a Tag now also looks outside the tag-file, > if the tag is used in a tag-file. So, if you use a tag implemented by a > tag-file inside some tag, and insid

Re: findAncestorWithClass in a tag, used in a tag-file

2006-11-21 Thread Michiel Meeuwissen
Michiel Meeuwissen wrote: > Michiel Meeuwissen wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I notice that in tomcat 5.5.20, in contradiction to tomcat 5.5.17, the > > findAncestorWithClass method of a Tag now also looks outside the tag-file, > > if the tag is used in a tag-file. So, if you use a tag implemented by a

findAncestorWithClass in a tag, used in a tag-file

2006-11-21 Thread Michiel Meeuwissen
Hello. I notice that in tomcat 5.5.20, in contradiction to tomcat 5.5.17, the findAncestorWithClass method of a Tag now also looks outside the tag-file, if the tag is used in a tag-file. So, if you use a tag implemented by a tag-file inside some tag, and inside the file of the tag-file you use a t

Re: svn commit: r477251 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/Response.java

2006-11-21 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
I figured :). I'll revert and hunt down the root cause. My guess is that if the response was used with output stream first, then recycled and then used again, somehow the conv ends up being null and causes a NPE in the write method. Filip Remy Maucherat wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Autho

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40997] - JkMountFile directive fails to update after the uri mapping file is modified

2006-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41007] - Can't define customized 503 error page

2006-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Proposal] Change in behaviour of uriworkermap.properties

2006-11-21 Thread Rainer Jung
Henri Gomez schrieb: > Why not just extends current jkstatus ? Mapping rules are kept process local. They are only shared, because the first process generates them and afterwards all other processes inherit them during fork. To make the rules manageable via jkstatus (everyone wants that, me too;

May Chun Chew/FEA/PEC is out of the office.

2006-11-21 Thread May Chun Chew
I will be out of the office starting 11/22/2006 and will not return until 11/23/2006. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Proposal] Change in behaviour of uriworkermap.properties

2006-11-21 Thread Henri Gomez
JkMount shouldn't be affected by any automatic reloading to preserve compatibility. The new mounts via uriworkermap.properties chould be considered transient, ie they could follow the file change but did the 60s isn't too long is some circumstance ? I think it will be better to make the Routing

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41007] - Can't define customized 503 error page

2006-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Getting StandardServer's NamingContext?

2006-11-21 Thread Daniel Santos
Is there a better way to get StandardServer's NamingContext than this? I'm writing a custom realm and I need some puggable resources (I'm using GlobalNamingResources to configure these, it's the cleanest way I could come up with) // code is from a RealmBase-derived class start() method Containe

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41007] - Can't define customized 503 error page

2006-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r477737 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationDispatcher.java

2006-11-21 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Tue Nov 21 08:35:19 2006 New Revision: 477737 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=477737 Log: Fix the logic of the checkSameObjects method. The method did not take into account that the lastServiceRequest/Response could be wrapped themselves. Modified: tomca

Re: [Proposal] Change in behaviour of uriworkermap.properties

2006-11-21 Thread Jean-frederic Clere
On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 11:58 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: > Henri Gomez schrieb: > > Why not just extends current jkstatus ? > > Mapping rules are kept process local. They are only shared, because the > first process generates them and afterwards all other processes inherit > them during fork. > > To

Re: svn commit: r477251 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/Response.java

2006-11-21 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: I figured :). I'll revert and hunt down the root cause. My guess is that if the response was used with output stream first, then recycled and then used again, somehow the conv ends up being null and causes a NPE in the write method. Ok, and what does the stack t

Re: suggestion about new loadbalancing method of mod_jk

2006-11-21 Thread Rainer Jung
Takayuki Kaneko schrieb: > Thank you for pointing out! > I'll try this setting next time. Actually, I patched mod_jk to output > the every worker's lb_value on every requests. In my analysis, it was > the following situation. > (Of cause the numbers of lb_value aren't real.) > > * before test > t

svn commit: r477406 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x: catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector/ webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/ webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/we

2006-11-21 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Mon Nov 20 15:34:22 2006 New Revision: 477406 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=477406 Log: Fix bug 40999. Add trust store configuration to admin webapp. Also clean up code in o.a.webapp.admin.connector Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/or

Re: svn commit: r477251 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/Response.java

2006-11-21 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: ok, here is what I found, CoyoteOutputStream.java public void print(String s) throws IOException { ob.write(s); } I see. It's a mistake: this should be converted using the fixed default encoding (it works most of the time, but if somehow the

svn commit: r477409 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/catalina/connector/mbeans-descriptors.xml webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2006-11-21 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Mon Nov 20 15:37:43 2006 New Revision: 477409 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=477409 Log: Port relevant parts of fix for bug 40999. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/mbeans-descriptors.xml tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/doc

Re: [Proposal] Change in behaviour of uriworkermap.properties

2006-11-21 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: If you think you can do that in a simple way, then fine. But if it would require a lots of changes, then I think we should go with the more powerful solution as part of 1.3 branch, by using shared memory, web interface, etc. I just don't think that this is so important if yo

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

2006-11-21 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
My alpha vote stands, there are a few bug fixes I added to 6.0.2: -output stream using the C2B converter -ApplicationDispatcher.checkSameObjects wasn't checking the root of the request/response that were last serviced -DBCP wouldn't even build with jdk1.5 To me, beta is when you can build, and

Re: svn commit: r477251 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/Response.java

2006-11-21 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
ok, here is what I found, CoyoteOutputStream.java public void print(String s) throws IOException { ob.write(s); } This calls OutputBuffer.java public void write(String s) throws IOException { if (suspended) return; if (s == null)

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

2006-11-21 Thread Tim Funk
Its time for beta. More folks will kick the tires. -Tim Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, 6.0.2 is: [ ] Alpha [X] Beta - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Initial Feedback on Tomcat 6.0.2 build system

2006-11-21 Thread Markus Schönhaber
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > Now for my problem. I got most of the way through compile then ran into > this. > > BUILD FAILED > /usr/portage/tmp/portage/www-servers/tomcat-6.0.2/work/apache-tomcat-6.0.2- >src/build.xml:388: Warning: Could not find file > /usr/portage/tmp/portage/www-servers/tom

Re: [Proposal] Change in behaviour of uriworkermap.properties

2006-11-21 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: E.g. if one empties the uriworkermap.properties, reloading it does not change the internal mount list. Temporarily adding and later removing an entry will not remove the entry. That's the entire point. But this is not what a user expects from a change in a list. I know, bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41007] New: - Can't define customized 503 error page

2006-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40002] - JULI Should Use Context ClassLoader for Formatter

2006-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40997] - JkMountFile directive fails to update after the uri mapping file is modified

2006-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r477251 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/Response.java

2006-11-21 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Mon Nov 20 08:47:03 2006 New Revision: 477251 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=477251 Log: TCK correction, depending on the sequence of the tests, the converter turns out to be null at certain times. Added in a check to create the converter even when getting the

Re: svn commit: r477251 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/Response.java

2006-11-21 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
I don't see anything wrong with my fix, as it is clear that the outputstream is using the converter java.lang.Exception: conv is null at org.apache.catalina.connector.OutputBuffer.write(OutputBuffer.java:471) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteOutputStream.print(CoyoteOutputS

Re: svn commit: r477369 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/CoyoteOutputStream.java

2006-11-21 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
:) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: remm Date: Mon Nov 20 14:31:37 2006 New Revision: 477369 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=477369 Log: - I suppose I can remove the method then. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/CoyoteOutputStream.java M