Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy... I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page. Please remedy this - even if it's a matter of 3 +1's for 'alpha'? Remy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha is now available for

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

+1 2006/11/17, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy... I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page. Please remedy this - even if it's a matter of 3 +1's for 'alpha'? Remy Maucher

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-tomcat-dbcp (in module jakarta-tomcat-5) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-tomcat-dbcp (in module jakarta-tomcat-5) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project tomcat-tc6-dbcp (in module tomcat-tc6) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project tomcat-tc6-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project tomcat-tc6-dbcp (in module tomcat-tc6) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project tomcat-tc6-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

+1 -- 6.0.2 is beta, Am 17.11.2006 um 10:46 schrieb William A. Rowe, Jr.: Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy... I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page. Please remedy this - even if it's a matter of 3 +1's for

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

I could swear we had agreed before the release candidate was posted to call the first couple of 6.0 builds alpha... +1 for 6.0.1 as alpha. Yoav On 11/17/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy... I don't

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy... I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page. +1 -- Mladen - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy... I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page. Nothing got broken. Tomcat is probably one of the latest remaining projects where the developers and PMC st

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40668] - MailSessionFactory is missing in Tomcat 5.5.20

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40993] New: - add session_cookie to lb worker to support customed SESSION_IDENTIFIER

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40993] - add session_cookie to lb worker to support customed SESSION_IDENTIFIER

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Jasper: Using a non-File based environment

Hi, I am new to this list, so let me quickly introduce myself: I am Felix Meschberger and am working on a Web Content Management Application running on a Java Content Repository (Apache Jackrabbit) provding amongst other things dynamic compilation of JSP scripts. I am also a committer to the Jack

Re: svn commit: r452464 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/scripts/build/instdso.sh

Hello Jean-Frederic, there is a problem with the instdso.sh you checked in. It removes a couple of files at the end, including the mod_jk.la file. When we run "make install" afterwards, apxs again tries to run instdso.sh from it's apache installation and complains about the missing mod_jk.la.

Re: Jasper: Using a non-File based environment

Felix Meschberger wrote: Hi, I am new to this list, so let me quickly introduce myself: I am Felix Meschberger and am working on a Web Content Management Application running on a Java Content Repository (Apache Jackrabbit) provding amongst other things dynamic compilation of JSP scripts. I am al

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39589] - $CATALINA_BASE/shared/lib and $CATALINA_BASE/shared/classes libraries not found in specific deployments

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

Remy Maucherat wrote: 6.0.2 is: [ ] Alpha [X] Beta I like it :) Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

Mladen Turk wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF >> policy... >> I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your >> downloads page. >> > > Nothing got broken. Actually it did, because I've followed the list for

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

Hi, I understand what Bill is saying. Let's talk specifics to see what we missed. We had a poll on this public mailing list to decide on a time and date to cut 6.0.1. We agreed on a time/date, and cut the release then. We announced here that the release was available and said we'd have a stabi

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

6.0.2 is: [ ] Alpha [X] Beta - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

Yoav Shapira wrote: > > What did we miss? Was it a formal announcement to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > about 6.0.1 stability? Was it formally marking the 6.0.1 time/date > poll as a voting thread and posting its results? What you are missing is pretty straightforward. It's that you can't have a release

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40668] - MailSessionFactory is missing in Tomcat 5.5.20

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40996] New: - Tomcat Connectors 1.2.19 sticky sessions not sticky

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu