DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39090] - Memory Leak: Tomcat files keep references to classes loaded by WebappClassLoader

2006-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout

2006-10-02 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi all, I would like to propose a simple vote on the thing I consider as very important. It's probably the first vote ever done for the commited code, but the reasons are known for the folks reading tomcat dev list. The things we have right now for dealing with Keep-Alive is dependent only on th

Re: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout

2006-10-02 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, On 10/2/06, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I propose that we split that to the real soTimeout which is the timeout between two consecutive read() on http request and the additional keepAliveTimeout that will be used for determining the timeout between two requests. [ X ] I'm for t

Re: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout

2006-10-02 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mladen Turk wrote: Hi all, I would like to propose a simple vote on the thing I consider as very important. I see that. The things we have right now for dealing with Keep-Alive is dependent only on the soTimeout. I propose that we split that to the real soTimeout which is the timeout betwee

Re: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout

2006-10-02 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
where is this proposed, 6.0 or 5.5.x dot release? Filip Mladen Turk wrote: Hi all, I would like to propose a simple vote on the thing I consider as very important. It's probably the first vote ever done for the commited code, but the reasons are known for the folks reading tomcat dev list. T

svn commit: r452091 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: ./ webapps/docs/

2006-10-02 Thread remm
Author: remm Date: Mon Oct 2 08:52:29 2006 New Revision: 452091 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=452091 Log: - Doc updates. Added: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml (with props) Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/cla

Re: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout

2006-10-02 Thread Mladen Turk
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: where is this proposed, 6.0 or 5.5.x dot release? Sorry it's targeted for 6.0 (I thought it was clear from the patches) Regards, Mladen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additiona

Re: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout

2006-10-02 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
[X] I'm for that proposal [ ] I'm against that proposal [ ] I don't care Filip Mladen Turk wrote: Hi all, I would like to propose a simple vote on the thing I consider as very important. It's probably the first vote ever done for the commited code, but the reasons are known for the folks read

RE: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout

2006-10-02 Thread Bill Barker
> -Original Message- > From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 4:25 AM > To: tomcat Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout > > Hi all, > > I would like to propose a simple vote on the thing I consider >

Re: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout

2006-10-02 Thread Mladen Turk
Bill Barker wrote: I pretty much agree with Remy: Anything useful this would do has been in place since the early days of Coyote. Also, anybody that actually would care about this option almost certainly wouldn't be using the JIO Connector :). Fair enough. Someone even said that there is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38898] - Tomcat service fails without error message

2006-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout

2006-10-02 Thread Mark Thomas
Mladen Turk wrote: > [X] I'm for that proposal > [ ] I'm against that proposal > [ ] I don't care If you believe there is a requirement for it, the implementation can be done cleanly and you are prepared to support it then go for it. I would like to echo Yoav's comments that the docs should be up

svn commit: r452281 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml

2006-10-02 Thread remm
Author: remm Date: Mon Oct 2 17:17:20 2006 New Revision: 452281 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=452281 Log: - First pass at docs. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/

svn commit: r452284 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves: FastCommonAccessLogValve.java JDBCAccessLogValve.java PersistentValve.java

2006-10-02 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Mon Oct 2 17:29:57 2006 New Revision: 452284 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=452284 Log: Remove unused code in o.a.c.valves Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves/FastCommonAccessLogValve.java tomcat/container

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35914] - Problem to create and delete Access Log Valve many times

2006-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39724] - Bug on StandardPipeline.removeValve(Valve valve) for T5.5.16+

2006-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39724] - Bug on StandardPipeline.removeValve(Valve valve) for T5.5.16+

2006-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r452287 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x: catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardPipeline.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2006-10-02 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Mon Oct 2 18:06:12 2006 New Revision: 452287 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=452287 Log: Fix bug 39724. Removing the only valve from a pipeline did not return the pipeline to its original state. Patched provided by David Gagnon. Modified: tomcat/container

svn commit: r452288 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardPipeline.java

2006-10-02 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Mon Oct 2 18:08:32 2006 New Revision: 452288 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=452288 Log: Port fix for bug 39724. Removing the only valve from a pipeline did not return the pipeline to its original state. Patched provided by David Gagnon. Modified: tomcat/t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35943] - request.getRemoteUser() is not getting populated on first time frame requests

2006-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r452291 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps: admin/resources/envEntry.jsp docs/changelog.xml

2006-10-02 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Mon Oct 2 18:37:46 2006 New Revision: 452291 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=452291 Log: Fix bug 35968. Make env entry props input a text area. Patch provided by Tristan Marly. Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/admin/resources/envEntry.jsp tom

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35968] - Please make Environment Entry Properties Value input a textarea

2006-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36153] - html:form action is blank

2006-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout

2006-10-02 Thread Henri Gomez
+0 2006/10/3, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Mladen Turk wrote: > [X] I'm for that proposal > [ ] I'm against that proposal > [ ] I don't care If you believe there is a requirement for it, the implementation can be done cleanly and you are prepared to support it then go for it. I would like