svn commit: r437990 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_lb_worker.c

2006-08-29 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Tue Aug 29 00:19:18 2006 New Revision: 437990 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437990&view=rev Log: We are using C not C++ compiler, so make sure variable declarations are before any variable usage. Not sure if GCC allows that, but MSVC certainly does not. Modified: t

svn commit: r437994 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common: jk_lb_worker.c jk_util.c

2006-08-29 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Tue Aug 29 00:37:23 2006 New Revision: 437994 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437994&view=rev Log: Fix return values from jk_get_worker_activation. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_lb_worker.c tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_util.

svn commit: r437995 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c

2006-08-29 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Tue Aug 29 00:38:16 2006 New Revision: 437995 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437995&view=rev Log: Fix const char* -> char * problem by duping the provided config value. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c Modified: tomcat/connectors/trun

svn commit: r437996 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-1.3/mod_jk.c

2006-08-29 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Tue Aug 29 00:39:09 2006 New Revision: 437996 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437996&view=rev Log: Update because of the changed jk_map_resolve_references function API. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-1.3/mod_jk.c Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-29 Thread Mladen Turk
Henri Gomez wrote: BTW, a windows binary will be usefull also http://people.apache.org/~mturk/jk1219/ Done some bug fixes to be able to compile, so they are in sync with trunk. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-29 Thread Henri Gomez
What does 'ls -l usr/sbin/apxs2-worker' say? On Suse Linux distribution, rpm packager provide one apxs by MPM model. apxs2-worker is for worker mode, apxs2-prefork for prefork mode; Cheers

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-29 Thread Henri Gomez
2006/8/29, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Henri Gomez wrote: > > BTW, a windows binary will be usefull also > http://people.apache.org/~mturk/jk1219/ Done some bug fixes to be able to compile, so they are in sync with trunk. Thanks. BTW, what about releasing a new tarball including this

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-29 Thread Rainer Jung
If no one stops me, I'll do so at in 30 minutes :) Henri Gomez schrieb: > 2006/8/29, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> Henri Gomez wrote: >> > >> > BTW, a windows binary will be usefull also >> > >> >> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/jk1219/ >> >> Done some bug fixes to be able to compile, >>

svn commit: r438007 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_util.c

2006-08-29 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Tue Aug 29 01:27:06 2006 New Revision: 438007 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=438007&view=rev Log: Add another deprecated directive. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_util.c Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_util.c URL: http:

svn commit: r438008 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_status.c

2006-08-29 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Tue Aug 29 01:30:53 2006 New Revision: 438008 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=438008&view=rev Log: Make string handling in new function a little more robust. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_status.c Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/c

svn commit: r438010 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common: jk_lb_worker.c jk_lb_worker.h

2006-08-29 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Tue Aug 29 01:32:05 2006 New Revision: 438010 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=438010&view=rev Log: Give new constant a more eprecise name. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_lb_worker.c tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_lb_worker.h M

svn commit: r438020 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_status.c

2006-08-29 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Tue Aug 29 02:03:09 2006 New Revision: 438020 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=438020&view=rev Log: Only apply usable values for activation from status worker updates. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_status.c Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk

svn commit: r438031 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common: jk_lb_worker.c jk_util.c

2006-08-29 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Tue Aug 29 02:35:33 2006 New Revision: 438031 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=438031&view=rev Log: Set a valid default activation. Delete check for valid activation values. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_lb_worker.c tomcat/connectors/trunk/

Re: TCK Failed Was: Tomcat 5.5.18-beta preview

2006-08-29 Thread Remy Maucherat
Dies Koper wrote: Hello Filip, In my application I used a pageContext.include which once threw a JasperException (ServletException) while it was supposed to (according to the spec) propagate the IOException as-is. I noticed that setting the "deployment" init param in conf\web.xml to "false" m

[Update] Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-29 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi all, Mladen and I applied some minor but partly important fixes. The result is available from trunk, but also as a tarball from http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-1.2.19-438031/ Under this URL you can also find the docs (no changes form previous quality check). Feel free to send any obse

Re: TCK Failed Was: Tomcat 5.5.18-beta preview

2006-08-29 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
I'm still running the tests, I had some funky results come up when I turned off development, and I am re-running the tests to make sure it wasn't me screwing it up Filip Remy Maucherat wrote: Dies Koper wrote: Hello Filip, In my application I used a pageContext.include which once threw a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40347] New: - Manager displays spurious contexts when multi-level context paths are used

2006-08-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: TCK Failed Was: Tomcat 5.5.18-beta preview

2006-08-29 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: I'm still running the tests, I had some funky results come up when I turned off development, and I am re-running the tests to make sure it wasn't me screwing it up This is not really related, but where's the 5.5.18 build ? Rémy -

Re: TCK Failed Was: Tomcat 5.5.18-beta preview

2006-08-29 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: I'm still running the tests, I had some funky results come up when I turned off development, and I am re-running the tests to make sure it wasn't me screwing it up This is not really related, but where's the 5.5.18 build ? http://people.ap

Re: TCK Failed Was: Tomcat 5.5.18-beta preview

2006-08-29 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
ok, development=false took care of the three errors, the TCK now runs error free for the first run, any subsequent runs I get about 50 or so errors. If I delete the contents of the work directory, it again runs error free, I'll do some investigations to see if its an actual issue Filip Remy

Re: TCK Failed Was: Tomcat 5.5.18-beta preview

2006-08-29 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: I'm still running the tests, I had some funky results come up when I turned off development, and I am re-running the tests to make sure it wasn't me screwing it up This is not really related, but where's the

Re: TCK Failed Was: Tomcat 5.5.18-beta preview

2006-08-29 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: I'm still running the tests, I had some funky results come up when I turned off development, and I am re-running the tests to make sure it wasn't me screwing it up This is not really re

Re: Tomcat 5.5.18-beta preview

2006-08-29 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, Cool. The directory structure and signatures look good. We need to update the release notes (http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/v5.5.18-beta/RELEASE-NOTES) to remove the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL section on Linux, as Bill (IIRC) pointed out the day. ok before I remove the LD_ASSUME

Re: Tomcat 5.5.18-beta preview

2006-08-29 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Filip, I can't give the correct recommendations, but explain the flag: The flag tells the loader not to load the default thread library, but instead another - usually older - one. Linux had incompatible changes in it's thread implementation and since the distros bundle so much software, they h

Re: Tomcat 5.5.18-beta preview

2006-08-29 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, We need to clarify the message according to Bill's comments from a thread on this list last week. The message is still correct for some users, especially those using Tomcat 4.1, JDK 1.4, and certain Linux kernels. We should make it clear the message does not apply to all situations, should n

Re: Tomcat 5.5.18-beta preview

2006-08-29 Thread Jean-frederic Clere
Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, We need to clarify the message according to Bill's comments from a thread on this list last week. The message is still correct for some users, especially those using Tomcat 4.1, JDK 1.4, and certain Linux kernels. It was for RH9 JDK1.4.0 and 1.3.1... Old stuff. Look to

Re: Tomcat 5.5.18-beta preview

2006-08-29 Thread Remy Maucherat
Jean-frederic Clere wrote: Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, We need to clarify the message according to Bill's comments from a thread on this list last week. The message is still correct for some users, especially those using Tomcat 4.1, JDK 1.4, and certain Linux kernels. It was for RH9 JDK1.4.0 and

Re: Tomcat 5.5.18-beta preview

2006-08-29 Thread Jason Brittain
Hi guys. On 8/29/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, We need to clarify the message according to Bill's comments from a thread on this list last week. Clarifying it would be preferable. The message is still correct for some users, especially those using Tomcat 4.1, JDK 1.4, and

Re: Tomcat 5.5.18-beta preview

2006-08-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Jason Brittain wrote: > > Then, later, I needed Java 1.5.x features, so I upgraded it to > Sun Java 1.5.0. At the time that I upgraded just the JDK, I > knew very well that I have LD_ASSUME_KERNEL set, but I > since I didn't upgrade the OS (same kernel & libs) I left that > setting alone to see i

Re: Tomcat 5.5.18-beta preview

2006-08-29 Thread Remy Maucherat
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Jason Brittain wrote: Then, later, I needed Java 1.5.x features, so I upgraded it to Sun Java 1.5.0. At the time that I upgraded just the JDK, I knew very well that I have LD_ASSUME_KERNEL set, but I since I didn't upgrade the OS (same kernel & libs) I left that sett

Improvement of Catalina ant task

2006-08-29 Thread Didier Donsez
Dear all Catalina ant task sets only one mbean attribute My improvement proposes to set several attributes by using sun-elements The MBeanServer.setAttributes(ObjectName name,AttributeList attributes) method is used instead of the MBeanServer.setAttribute(ObjectName name,Attribute attribute) me

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31804] - setParent() is not called on nested tags in a tag file (.tagx)

2006-08-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40354] New: - jsp-examples webapp comes with old, broken standard.jar and/or jstl.jar

2006-08-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40347] - Manager displays spurious contexts when multi-level context paths are used

2006-08-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40354] - jsp-examples webapp comes with old, broken standard.jar and/or jstl.jar

2006-08-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33262] - Service Manager autostart should check for administrative rights

2006-08-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33806] - Session tracking using URL rewriting fails, if client URL-encodes reserved characters ; and =

2006-08-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36905] - Tomcat WebDAV characters bug

2006-08-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36853] - https

2006-08-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37054] - NoClassDefFoundError using ServletContextListener WITH CUSTOM LOADER

2006-08-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39704] - context with privileged="true" do not setup properly inner loaders

2006-08-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39309] - tomcat can't compile big jsp, hitting a compiler limit

2006-08-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40335] - Sample of isapi_redirect.properties in the documentation is incomplete

2006-08-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40356] New: - expressions in XML attributes evaluated in wrong order

2006-08-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu