svn commit: r420258 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_uri_worker_map.c

Author: mturk Date: Sun Jul 9 01:44:12 2006 New Revision: 420258 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=420258&view=rev Log: Allow multiple mappings with JKMount directive as we have for uriworkermap.properties. The /servlets-examples|/* worker will be treated as two mount directives: /servlets-ex

svn commit: r420265 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.c

Author: mturk Date: Sun Jul 9 02:09:22 2006 New Revision: 420265 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=420265&view=rev Log: Make sure we use real worker retries instead one that comes from service (loadbalancer). This enables sticky-session to work without going to another worker if lb retries ar

svn commit: r420266 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_service.h

Author: mturk Date: Sun Jul 9 02:11:05 2006 New Revision: 420266 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=420266&view=rev Log: Lower down the default JK_RETRIES to 2. The number 2 is enough for detecting broken socket and one making one reconnect. If that fails the worker is in error state for sure.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39452] - IIS ISAPI MOD_JK omits headers when run as application extension

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39636] - mod_jk does not pass SSL client certificate chain to AJP connector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39637] - AJP13 connector does not handle chain of SSL client certificate

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39990] - Cewolf graphic makes connector behave strange

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39505] - jakarta-tomcat-connectors-1.2.15-src compilation glitch

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39552] - Jakarta ISAPI Filter Patch

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

JK and AJP protocol enhancements

You see how desperate I am when writing this on Sunday :) Anyhow, we are pretty close to the new JK release that I hope will be the most usable and stable whatsoever. The things we agreed so many times before, but having obviously too little resources to actually create are the 1.3 branch (aka J

svn commit: r420276 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/changelog.xml

Author: mturk Date: Sun Jul 9 03:45:38 2006 New Revision: 420276 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=420276&view=rev Log: Update changes file Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/changelog.xml Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/changelog.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewv

Re: JK and AJP protocol enhancements

Mladen Turk wrote: You see how desperate I am when writing this on Sunday :) Anyhow, we are pretty close to the new JK release that I hope will be the most usable and stable whatsoever. The things we agreed so many times before, but having obviously too little resources to actually create are t

Re: JK and AJP protocol enhancements

What's the status with mod_proxy ? It seems this kind of change would break backward compatibility, and if this happens - maybe it's better to fix the protocol marshalling limitations or change it completely. I hate the idea of patching an old and mostly broken marshalling model. The only thing

Re: JK and AJP protocol enhancements

"Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > You see how desperate I am when writing this on Sunday :) > > Anyhow, we are pretty close to the new JK release that I > hope will be the most usable and stable whatsoever. > > The things we agreed so many times before, b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39452] - IIS ISAPI MOD_JK omits headers when run as application extension

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Bug report for Tomcat 3 [2006/07/09]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Watchdog [2006/07/09]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2006/07/09]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 5 [2006/07/09]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37285] - POST of document through CGI

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39997] New: - JSVC and APR do not work together for HTTPS connector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu