Re: svn commit: r411541 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common: jk_ajp_common.c jk_ajp_common.h jk_util.c

I noted a spelling mistake in the log line below, endpont should probably be endpoint (missing i). -Dave On 6/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.c (original) +++ tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.c S

Re: svn commit: r411543 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs: changelog.xml config/workers.xml

There is a spelling error below, incative should be inactive. -Dave On 6/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/config/workers.xml (original) +++ tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/config/workers.xml Sun Jun 4 02:32:30 2006 @@ -172,9 +170,21 @@ D

svn commit: r411713 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk: native/common/jk_ajp_common.c xdocs/config/workers.xml

Author: mturk Date: Mon Jun 5 01:32:54 2006 New Revision: 411713 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=411713&view=rev Log: Fix spelling. Thanks David :) Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.c tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/config/workers.xml Modified: tomc

svn commit: r411717 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk: native/common/jk_ajp_common.c native/common/jk_ajp_common.h xdocs/changelog.xml xdocs/config/workers.xml

Author: mturk Date: Mon Jun 5 01:50:10 2006 New Revision: 411717 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=411717&view=rev Log: Added RECOVER_ABORT_IF_CLIENTERROR recovery_option that closes the connection if client connection is broken during the request. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/na

svn commit: r411719 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.h

Author: mturk Date: Mon Jun 5 01:52:12 2006 New Revision: 411719 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=411719&view=rev Log: Fix typo. The flag should be 4 instead 6. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.h Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_

Re: What happened to the mod_jk 1.2.16 release?

David Rees wrote: OK, I see that mladen has recently checked in some jk changes. As soon as he gives the word, I'll check out the latest from SVN and do some testing. Think I'm done with all the patches I had on my schedule. Feel free to check the HEAD. Regards, Mladen.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project tomcat-tc6 (in module tomcat-tc6) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project tomcat-tc6 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project tomcat-tc6 (in module tomcat-tc6) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project tomcat-tc6 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39721] New: - Request parameter is null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Bug + Patch on StandardPipeline.removeValve(Valve valve) for T5.5.16+

Hi all, I run into this problem with T5 when tring to add/remove/add a valve to the standard engine. -For what I understand an empty pipeline has: basic = StandardEngineValve (For example); first = null; -If you add a valve you will get basic = StandardEngineValve first = myValve (with myVal

Re: Bug + Patch on StandardPipeline.removeValve(Valve valve) for T5.5.16+

David Gagnon wrote: > Hope that oki. I look the 5.5.17 code and the problem is still there. > Is that the right way to submit a Patch. If I need to open a bug > directly, let me know It is usually best to open a bug report and attach your patch. This way, it is less likely to get overlooked if s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39724] New: - Bug on StandardPipeline.removeValve(Valve valve) for T5.5.16+

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39724] - Bug on StandardPipeline.removeValve(Valve valve) for T5.5.16+

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39699] - simple deploy failed in cluster (distributable flag)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39699] - simple deploy failed in cluster (distributable flag)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39699] - simple deploy failed in cluster (distributable flag)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39699] - simple deploy failed in cluster (distributable flag)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39728] New: - Tomcat throws Security Exception when using signed activation.jar

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r411968 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/VERSION

Author: fhanik Date: Mon Jun 5 18:55:22 2006 New Revision: 411968 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=411968&view=rev Log: just a small update to release a new build on the website Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/VERSION Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/group

Re: What happened to the mod_jk 1.2.16 release?

On 6/5/06, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Think I'm done with all the patches I had on my schedule. Feel free to check the HEAD. I built the latest from SVN today and ran a few of my applications through it and didn't notice any anomalies. Looks good so far, thanks! -Dave