DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38553] - Wrong HTTP code for failed CLIENT-CERT authentication

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

5.5.17 zip/exe service install

Hi, Will the new 5.5.17 zip distro come with the tomcat EXE files used by service.bat to install the service? I noted in 5.5.16 the EXEs were missing, whilst the service.bat remained. If this was intentional to keep the ZIP distro down in size in favour of the EXE distro I would disagree with th

svn commit: r396873 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/src/share/org/apache/catalina/tribes: ByteMessage.java group/RpcCallback.java tipis/ReplicatedMap.java tipis/RpcCallback.java

Author: fhanik Date: Tue Apr 25 06:06:31 2006 New Revision: 396873 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=396873&view=rev Log: Moved the RpcCallback interface to the correct location Added: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/src/share/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/RpcCallback.java

svn commit: r396874 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/src/share/org/apache/catalina/tribes: group/Response.java tipis/Response.java

Author: fhanik Date: Tue Apr 25 06:08:15 2006 New Revision: 396874 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=396874&view=rev Log: moved to the correct location Added: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/src/share/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/Response.java - copied, changed from

svn commit: r396895 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/src/share/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/RpcChannel.java

Author: fhanik Date: Tue Apr 25 07:13:21 2006 New Revision: 396895 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=396895&view=rev Log: Added a NO_REPLY to RPC messages Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/src/share/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/RpcChannel.java Modified: tomcat/co

svn commit: r396896 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/src/share/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/RpcChannel.java

Author: fhanik Date: Tue Apr 25 07:15:53 2006 New Revision: 396896 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=396896&view=rev Log: don't need to add it to the map, if we don't expect any responses Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/src/share/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/RpcC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39402] New: - enabling gzip negotiation overwrites existing "vary:" headers

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38484] - webapps Admin: Invalid path /login was requested

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39404] New: - Tomcat 5.0.28 service fails without error message on Windows2003

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39326] - RMI doesn't work when unpackWars="true"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Memory usage Tomcat 3.3 vs 5.5

Hi all, Following up on this thread, we took a dump of the heap running tomcat 5.5. There is no good reason for JMX to consume 9-10 Meg. 97,236 5,178,736 array of char 25,494 3,463,312 array of java/util/HashMap$Entry 105,908 3,389,056 java/util/HashMap$Entry 98,510 3,152,320

Re: Memory usage Tomcat 3.3 vs 5.5

Hmm... So model MBeans are not such a pancea after all :-) They're certainly the most complex and unapproachable form of MBean, which Commons Modeler tries to address, of course. I alway suspected that they had an overtly heavy nature at runtime, though -- and it appears that there is some t

Re: Memory usage Tomcat 3.3 vs 5.5

Abhi Karmos wrote: Has anybody looked in the code where the DescriptorSupport class is used? 22 thousand of these things is simply absurd. Nearly 100 thousand DescriptorSupport.ValueHolder objects is even crazier. My guess is that the HashMap usage is related to the DescriptorSupport. It is c

Re: Memory usage Tomcat 3.3 vs 5.5

Remy Maucherat wrote: Abhi Karmos wrote: Has anybody looked in the code where the DescriptorSupport class is used? 22 thousand of these things is simply absurd. Nearly 100 thousand DescriptorSupport.ValueHolder objects is even crazier. My guess is that the HashMap usage is related to the Descr

Re: Memory usage Tomcat 3.3 vs 5.5

I have to disagree with any statement like this - nobody can decide that his use case is the 'main' use case for tomcat. Yes, tomcat is used in a lot of production environments where speed and manageability are important. But it is also used by developers ( and I suspect for each production site y

Re: Memory usage Tomcat 3.3 vs 5.5

Costin Manolache wrote: Not sure what is the plan for commons-modeler, I think it is worth to bring it back to tomcat or fork a separate implementation Modeler is now in the tomcat.util package in the new repository, so you can try to improve it if you'd like to. One first change I made is tha

Re: Memory usage Tomcat 3.3 vs 5.5

So ... rather than something small and fiesty ("Tomcat") perhaps the name should be mega-gozo-zilla-raptor-cat, or similar? Truth in advertising. :) On 4/25/06, Jess Holle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Remy Maucherat wrote: > [snip] > > It is completely irrelevant compared to the memory usage o

Re: Memory usage Tomcat 3.3 vs 5.5

Costin Manolache wrote: I have to disagree with any statement like this - nobody can decide that his use case is the 'main' use case for tomcat. Yes, tomcat is used in a lot of production environments where speed and manageability are important. But it is also used by developers ( and I suspect

Re: Memory usage Tomcat 3.3 vs 5.5

On 4/25/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Costin Manolache wrote: > > Not sure what is the plan for commons-modeler, I think it is worth to > > bring it back to tomcat or fork a separate implementation > > Modeler is now in the tomcat.util package in the new repository, so you > can t

Re: Memory usage Tomcat 3.3 vs 5.5

Hmm... Sharing redundant MBeanInfo's shouldn't be that hard to wedge in. Unfortunately, I don't know when I'll have time to take a proper look at this... -- Jess Holle Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Not sure what is the plan for commons-modeler, I think it is worth to bring

Re: Memory usage Tomcat 3.3 vs 5.5

Costin Manolache wrote: On 4/25/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Not sure what is the plan for commons-modeler, I think it is worth to bring it back to tomcat or fork a separate implementation Modeler is now in the tomcat.util package in the

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat v5.5.17 Stability

> [x] Stable - no major issues > Thank you, No, thank *you*. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39406] New: - StandardSession#getLastAccessedTime() uses wrong message key

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39406] - StandardSession#getLastAccessedTime() uses wrong message key

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39406] - StandardSession#getLastAccessedTime() uses wrong message key

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r397095 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x: catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session/ modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/session/ modules/ha/src/share/org/apache/catal

Author: pero Date: Tue Apr 25 22:52:39 2006 New Revision: 397095 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=397095&view=rev Log: Fix that StandardSession#getLastAccessedTime() uses correct exception message. Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session/Standa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39406] - StandardSession#getLastAccessedTime() uses wrong message key

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r397098 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/session/StandardSession.java

Author: pero Date: Tue Apr 25 23:10:53 2006 New Revision: 397098 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=397098&view=rev Log: Fix that StandardSession#getLastAccessedTime() uses correct exception message Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/session/StandardSession.java Modi