Costin Manolache wrote:
Well, my point was - do we really need this feature ?
If nobody is really using it - it doesn't work out of box and we
didn't see any major complaint except Bob - it may be simpler to just
remove the flag from the docs and server.xml - and maybe even remove
the code that
Author: costin
Date: Sat Nov 5 19:13:06 2005
New Revision: 331062
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=331062&view=rev
Log:
Code for testing ( and using ) coyote standalone.
The adapters are very simple, more as example. The goal is to have a
minimal http connector, and play with nio and othe
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 7:13 PM
Subject: svn commit: r331062 - in /tomcat/sandbox/java/org/apache/coyote: ./
adapters/ standalone/
Author: costin
Date: Sat Nov 5 19:13:06 2005
New Revision: 331062
URL: http://svn.apach
I think cocoon is also using rhino, and few other projects - ant is
using it via BSF.
In any case - it is just an example, not required in any way - it's
easier to do some tests and experiments in a scripting language. The
build.xml file will just detect if js.jar is available and skip this
file o
