Rewrite features

Hi, As part of the JBoss Web project, I have developed a URL rewrite valve, more or less cloned on mod_rewrite. It doesn't support everything from mod_rewrite, and there's no docs at the moment, but it's not too hard to figure out how to use it. For looking at it and testing, it's here (of c

Re: Rewrite features

Hi, Cool, I like it. Two questions: - Why the RewriteMap interface? It does seem to add much over a normal Map, and I doubt you're targeting JDK 1.1 compatibility ;) - Seems like this could be easily done as a Filter instead of Valve. The lifecycle support would be a bit different, start -> in

Re: Rewrite features

Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, Cool, I like it. Two questions: - Why the RewriteMap interface? It does seem to add much over a normal Map, and I doubt you're targeting JDK 1.1 compatibility ;) It's not a map (at least not a Java map). mod_rewrite calls the directive RewriteMap. - Seems like thi

Re: tomcat source / eclipse project

I have something like this for TC5 & TC4. I do keep the files up to date because I use them every time I look at Tomcat code. I need to migrate my development areas from the old CVS structure to the SVN set-up. Once I have updated my eclipse files, I'll add them to the repo. Anyone object to

Re: Rewrite features

Have you considered placing it at a lower level, as a coyote adapter ? The reason I ask - I'm playing with coyote standalone, I have a trivial mapper, file server, hello world adapter - for simple http serving. This would fit well before entering the servlet engine. Costin On 11/3/05, Remy Mauche

Re: tomcat source / eclipse project

+1 It is a pain setting these up. Keith Mark Thomas wrote: I have something like this for TC5 & TC4. I do keep the files up to date because I use them every time I look at Tomcat code. I need to migrate my development areas from the old CVS structure to the SVN set-up. Once I have updated m

Re: tomcat source / eclipse project

Mark Thomas wrote: I have something like this for TC5 & TC4. I do keep the files up to date because I use them every time I look at Tomcat code. I need to migrate my development areas from the old CVS structure to the SVN set-up. Once I have updated my eclipse files, I'll add them to the rep

Re: Rewrite features

It probably doesn't matter (since nobody uses it :), but using ThreadLocal won't work with the Nio/AJP Connector. That one doesn't bind a Request instance to a Thread instance, so a particular Request instance will process on many different Threads during its lifecycle. The alternative (which, IM

Re: Rewrite features

Hi, > The reason I ask - I'm playing with coyote standalone, I have a > trivial mapper, file server, hello world adapter - for simple http > serving. I would love, love, love to see this. What's the download footprint size? Thanks, Yoav Yoav Shapira System Design and Management Fellow MIT Sl

Re: Rewrite features

On 11/3/05, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It probably doesn't matter (since nobody uses it :), but using ThreadLocal > won't work with the Nio/AJP Connector. That one doesn't bind a Request > instance to a Thread instance, so a particular Request instance will process > on many differen

Re: Rewrite features

- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 11:30 AM Subject: Re: Rewrite features On 11/3/05, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It probably doesn't matter (since nobody uses it :), but using Th

Re: Rewrite features

Costin Manolache wrote: On 11/3/05, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It probably doesn't matter (since nobody uses it :), but using ThreadLocal won't work with the Nio/AJP Connector. That one doesn't bind a Request instance to a Thread instance, so a particular Request instance will proc

Re: Rewrite features

Bill Barker wrote: We don't unbind the service() from the Thread. However, in Coyote Request instances are very long lived objects that (at least for HTTP/1.1) persist over many connections. The APR Connector uses a ThreadLocal to bind the Request instance to a single Thread instance. The next

Re: Rewrite features

On 11/3/05, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Developers List" > Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 11:30 AM > Subject: Re: Rewrite features > > > On 11/3/05, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: Rewrite features

- Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 12:11 PM Subject: Re: Rewrite features >Costin Manolache wrote: >> On 11/3/05, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>It probably doesn't matter (since no

Re: Rewrite features

- Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 12:18 PM Subject: Re: Rewrite features >Bill Barker wrote: >> We don't unbind the service() from the Thread. However, in Coyote Request >> instances are very l

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37350] - Problems serving large (50k+) static images on linux

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37350] New: - Problems serving large (50k+) static images on linux

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Persistent "xmlValidation" Problem

Comments below, for any of you who care - Original Message - From: "Jeanfrancois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 9:11 AM Subject: Re: Persistent "xmlValidation" Problem Hi, Bob Bronson wrote: Hello, Sorry, to bot

Sloppy, Lazy Tomcat Developers (Was: Persistent "xmlValidation" Problem)

Comments below, for any of you who care - Original Message - From: "Jeanfrancois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 9:11 AM Subject: Re: Persistent "xmlValidation" Problem Hi, Bob Bronson wrote: Hello, Sorry, to bot

Re: Persistent "xmlValidation" Problem

Comments below, for any of you who care - Original Message - From: "Jeanfrancois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 9:11 AM Subject: Re: Persistent "xmlValidation" Problem Hi, Bob Bronson wrote: Hello, Sorry, to bot

Re: Persistent "xmlValidation" Problem

I'm just guessing here, and maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think this post is going to get you a whole lot of help in answering your questions. Maybe it will, I don't know, but I'm thinking not. Frank Bob Bronson wrote: Comments below, for any of you who care - Original Message -

Re: Persistent "xmlValidation" Problem

- Original Message - From: "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" Cc: Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 10:53 PM Subject: Re: Persistent "xmlValidation" Problem I'm just guessing here, and maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think this post is going to get yo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37351] New: - ORM support in Tomcat

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

test

Hi,  test a test   Regards -kw   Qiang(Kevin) WangSoftware Engineer Phone: 8610.85281188.1564 Mobile: 86.13910673958 Yahoo_IM/other: wiseking_wq[EMAIL PROTECTED]