On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Tim Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we really prefer to be particular about change logs. Then we should
> create a BUGZILLA VERSION called trunk and potentially a new "product"
> called tomcat 7 (or tomcat-unknown). Then any fix first goes into Bugzilla
> with
If we really prefer to be particular about change logs. Then we should
create a BUGZILLA VERSION called trunk and potentially a new "product"
called tomcat 7 (or tomcat-unknown). Then any fix first goes into
Bugzilla with a description of the fix.
Then every commit message would contain the BU
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:49 PM, jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Costin Manolache wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>
>> Costin Manolache wrote:
>>>
>>> I never understood the use of the manual changelog - as opposed
Costin Manolache wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
I never understood the use of the manual changelog - as opposed to svn log
and good commit messages.
Could we just use that ?
that would be nice if we then coul
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Costin Manolache wrote:
>
>> I never understood the use of the manual changelog - as opposed to svn log
>> and good commit messages.
>> Could we just use that ?
>>
> that would be nice if we then could generate th
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 21:45 -0700, Costin Manolache wrote:
> I never understood the use of the manual changelog - as opposed to svn log
> and good commit messages.
> Could we just use that ?
I don't see how it would be readable. The formatting is inconsistent, it
would likely have no links, etc.
Costin Manolache wrote:
I never understood the use of the manual changelog - as opposed to svn log
and good commit messages.
Could we just use that ?
that would be nice if we then could generate the 'changelog' to ship
with the release.
for an admin that is about to upgrade, it's much nicer
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> I'd like for us to start using the changelog for trunk, we're losing a
> lot of changes being documented, not everything gets ported to 6.0 etc
> do you guys have any thoughts on this?
There is a need to do a diff of trunk against 6.0.x and check that nothing
has f
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'd like for us to start using the changelog for trunk, we're losing a
lot of changes being documented, not everything gets ported to 6.0 etc
do you guys have any thoughts on this?
+1.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Filip
I never understood the use of the manual changelog - as opposed to svn log
and good commit messages.
Could we just use that ?
Costin
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I'd like for us to start using the changelog for trunk, we're losing a lot
> o
I'd like for us to start using the changelog for trunk, we're losing a
lot of changes being documented, not everything gets ported to 6.0 etc
do you guys have any thoughts on this?
Filip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
11 matches
Mail list logo
