On 16/09/09 13:23, Rainer Jung wrote:
Is tcnative 1.1.x CTR or RTC?
CTR, with standard branch exceptional clause:
"No new features, no API changes."
There are a couple of simple fixes sitting in there and waiting for a
vote, but if we are still RTC, I would like to apply t
On 16.09.2009 13:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Rainer Jung wrote:
>> Is tcnative 1.1.x CTR or RTC?
>
> I thought CTR - if that was wrong then I apologise.
No need.
>> We once had a status file, which was lost during the svn reorg. I
>> recovered it.
>
> Thanks. Sorr
Rainer Jung wrote:
> Is tcnative 1.1.x CTR or RTC?
I thought CTR - if that was wrong then I apologise.
> We once had a status file, which was lost during the svn reorg. I
> recovered it.
Thanks. Sorry for that.
> There are a couple of simple fixes sitting in there and waiting for a
Is tcnative 1.1.x CTR or RTC?
We once had a status file, which was lost during the svn reorg. I
recovered it.
There are a couple of simple fixes sitting in there and waiting for a
vote, but if we are still RTC, I would like to apply them before 1.1.17.
I was just wondering because of Marks
