Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 10:50 PM
>
> 2014-04-23 0:43 GMT+04:00 Mark Thomas :
(snip)
> > No objection to the final being restored, it is good practice to use
> > final when possible.
> >
> > It is
2014-04-23 0:43 GMT+04:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 22/04/2014 21:35, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2014-04-23 0:30 GMT+04:00 Mark Thomas :
>>> On 22/04/2014 21:21, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>>
Before posting, I checked just so I wouldn't embarrass myself. It
worked just fine. My guess is that
On 22/04/2014 21:35, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2014-04-23 0:30 GMT+04:00 Mark Thomas :
>> On 22/04/2014 21:21, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>
>>> Before posting, I checked just so I wouldn't embarrass myself. It
>>> worked just fine. My guess is that you changed the implementation
>>> to throw an
Mark,
On 4/22/14, 4:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/04/2014 21:21, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>
>> Before posting, I checked just so I wouldn't embarrass myself. It
>> worked just fine. My guess is that you changed the implementation
>> to throw an exception after removing the 'final' which the
2014-04-23 0:30 GMT+04:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 22/04/2014 21:21, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>
>> Before posting, I checked just so I wouldn't embarrass myself. It
>> worked just fine. My guess is that you changed the implementation
>> to throw an exception after removing the 'final' which then makes
On 22/04/2014 21:21, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Before posting, I checked just so I wouldn't embarrass myself. It
> worked just fine. My guess is that you changed the implementation
> to throw an exception after removing the 'final' which then makes
> the 'final' legal again.
I don't see any va
Mark,
On 4/22/14, 4:18 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/04/2014 21:15, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Mark,
>
>> On 4/22/14, 3:58 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 22/04/2014 20:53, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark/Konstantin,
>>>
On 4/18/14, 11:29 AM, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/04/2014 21:15, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 4/22/14, 3:58 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 22/04/2014 20:53, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> Mark/Konstantin,
>>
>>> On 4/18/14, 11:29 AM, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko
Mark,
On 4/22/14, 3:58 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/04/2014 20:53, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Mark/Konstantin,
>
>> On 4/18/14, 11:29 AM, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: kkolinko Revision: 1588102 Modified property: svn:log
>>>
>>> Modified: svn:log at Fri Apr 18 15:29:06 2014
>>> --
2014-04-22 23:53 GMT+04:00 Christopher Schultz :
> Mark/Konstantin,
>
> On 4/18/14, 11:29 AM, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: kkolinko
>> Revision: 1588102
>> Modified property: svn:log
>>
>> Modified: svn:log at Fri Apr 18 15:29:06 2014
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/04/2014 20:53, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark/Konstantin,
>
> On 4/18/14, 11:29 AM, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: kkolinko Revision: 1588102 Modified property: svn:log
>>
>> Modified: svn:log at Fri Apr 18 15:29:06 2014
>> -
Mark/Konstantin,
On 4/18/14, 11:29 AM, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: kkolinko
> Revision: 1588102
> Modified property: svn:log
>
> Modified: svn:log at Fri Apr 18 15:29:06 2014
> --
> --- svn:log (original)
> +++ s
Author: kkolinko
Revision: 1588102
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Fri Apr 18 15:29:06 2014
--
--- svn:log (original)
+++ svn:log Fri Apr 18 15:29:06 2014
@@ -1 +1,3 @@
Fix an Eclipse nag
+Correct signatur
13 matches
Mail list logo
