On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 15:27 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Jean-Frederic told me about that this morning after I committed.
>
> I did the implementation yesterday due to going through the status files
> for 5.5 and 6 and looking for missing parts concerning myself.
>
> The patches were easy ports o
On 24.03.2009 15:20, r...@apache.org wrote:
+ From what I know, nobody uses these two connectors in Tomcat, so it did
not seem
+ "port worthy" to me.
I'm confused now. The original patch backport proposal for the other
connectors contains the following comment made by you:
0: remm
On 24.03.2009 15:20, r...@apache.org wrote:
Author: remm
Date: Tue Mar 24 14:20:44 2009
New Revision: 757818
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=757818&view=rev
Log:
- Votes.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/
Author: remm
Date: Tue Mar 24 14:20:44 2009
New Revision: 757818
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=757818&view=rev
Log:
- Votes.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=7578
