Rainer Jung wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
So my question is: is there a reliable way to detect, if it would be
safer to just drop a flush request?
I think flush should still send a flush packet. One scenario would be
(in the servlet): write 10 bytes and flush (in this case,
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
So my question is: is there a reliable way to detect, if it would be
safer to just drop a flush request?
I think flush should still send a flush packet. One scenario would be
(in the servlet): write 10 bytes and flush (in this case, the response
has n
On Oct 5, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+* Fix explicit flush before response commit in the org.apache.jk
AJP connector.
+ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=580815
+ + +1: remm
I admit, that I don't have a better solution, but nevertheless a
Rainer Jung wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+* Fix explicit flush before response commit in the org.apache.jk AJP
connector.
+ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=580815
+ + +1: remm
I admit, that I don't have a better solution, but nevertheless a
question: In case the flush co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+* Fix explicit flush before response commit in the org.apache.jk AJP connector.
+ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=580815
+
+ +1: remm
I admit, that I don't have a better solution, but nevertheless a
question: In case the flush comes to early, i.e. b
Author: remm
Date: Fri Oct 5 07:51:35 2007
New Revision: 582291
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=582291&view=rev
Log:
- Propose r580815 for review.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS
