Re: svn commit: r579298 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-09-25 Thread jean-frederic clere
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > my suggestion, open a BZ item, attach the patch there, and have the > STATUS file refer to that item Or put it under people.apache.prg/~your_name/patches/bla.patch. Cheers Jean-Frederic > > Filip > > Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: >> are we really gonna put ea

Re: svn commit: r579298 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-09-25 Thread Rainer Jung
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: my suggestion, open a BZ item, attach the patch there, and have the STATUS file refer to that item I would agree with Filip, that the patches should not be inlined in the STATUS file. The file is for "status", so should be good for an overview (which patches are

Re: svn commit: r579298 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-09-25 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
my suggestion, open a BZ item, attach the patch there, and have the STATUS file refer to that item Filip Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: are we really gonna put each patch (the contents of it) in the STATUS file, this will make the status file unusable pretty quick, wont it? Filip [EMAIL PRO

Re: svn commit: r579298 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-09-25 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
are we really gonna put each patch (the contents of it) in the STATUS file, this will make the status file unusable pretty quick, wont it? Filip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: remm Date: Tue Sep 25 08:22:40 2007 New Revision: 579298 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579298&view=rev Log:

svn commit: r579298 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-09-25 Thread remm
Author: remm Date: Tue Sep 25 08:22:40 2007 New Revision: 579298 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579298&view=rev Log: - Patch update. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?rev=579298&r1