On Jul 6, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 05/07/2013 23:10, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> On Jul 5, 2013, at 9:33 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>> +http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page"; version="2.0">
>>> +
>>> +
>>> + foo
>>> + bar
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +
>>
>> I believe, strictly, can't have a sub-el
On 05/07/2013 23:10, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2013, at 9:33 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> +http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page"; version="2.0">
>> +
>> +
>> + foo
>> + bar
>> +
>> +
>> +
>
> I believe, strictly, can't have a sub-element like .
> Wouldn't the test case still hold if the was
On Jul 5, 2013, at 9:33 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> +http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page"; version="2.0">
> +
> +
> + foo
> + bar
> +
> +
> +
I believe, strictly, can't have a sub-element like .
Wouldn't the test case still hold if the was removed?
