Re: org.apache.catalina.util.InstanceSupport.fireInstanceEvent

2007-02-28 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Dominik Pospisil wrote: Dominik Pospisil wrote: So I am thinking if this could not be the problem. Is is necessary to be this implementation synchronized? Given the implementation, you are not supposed to be using instance listeners at this time except for debugging purposes. Since

Re: org.apache.catalina.util.InstanceSupport.fireInstanceEvent

2007-02-28 Thread Dominik Pospisil
> Dominik Pospisil wrote: > > So I am thinking if this could not be the problem. Is is necessary to be > > this implementation synchronized? > > Given the implementation, you are not supposed to be using instance > listeners at this time except for debugging purposes. > > Since InstanceSupport is a

Re: org.apache.catalina.util.InstanceSupport.fireInstanceEvent

2007-02-22 Thread Remy Maucherat
Dominik Pospisil wrote: So I am thinking if this could not be the problem. Is is necessary to be this implementation synchronized? Given the implementation, you are not supposed to be using instance listeners at this time except for debugging purposes. Since InstanceSupport is array based, I

org.apache.catalina.util.InstanceSupport.fireInstanceEvent

2007-02-22 Thread Dominik Pospisil
ingle lock in: "http-10.68.1.19-8080-3078" daemon prio=1 tid=0xa9942e60 nid=0x29c7 waiting for monitor entry [0x45086000..0x45086eb0] at org.apache.catalina.util.InstanceSupport.fireInstanceEvent(InstanceSupport.java:180) - waiting to lock <0xb2c337a8> (a [Lorg.apache.catal