On 12/16/06, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Important: maps are associated to virtual hosts in apache. The status
worker can only see those maps, that belong to the same virtual host, it
has been called in. So if you add all your maps to a vhost for
production use, and add a status worker
Good explanation since I wondering why the jkstatus didn't see my
JKMount directive.
In my case the jkstatus is defined in the httpd.conf (common) and the
JKMounts in all VHost.
It's a very common configuration since Web admins don't want to
redifine a jkstatus for each vhost.
2006/12/16, Rai
Hi David,
this message means, that no forwarding rules (=map) have been found for
that worker. So no JkMount, mount attribute in workers.properties or
uriworkermap.properties applies to that worker.
Important: maps are associated to virtual hosts in apache. The status
worker can only see those ma
On 12/6/06, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- reworked status worker (see new docs page)
On my status worker page, I get the message:
Warning: No URI Mappings defined for !
Otherwise, everything seems to work OK so far in my limited testing.
-Dave
---
Thanks
2006/12/8, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mladen made a win build available in the meantime (thanks!). You can
find it under
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-1.2.20-dev/binaries/
Regards,
Rainer
-
To unsubscr
Mladen made a win build available in the meantime (thanks!). You can
find it under
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-1.2.20-dev/binaries/
Regards,
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
; From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 6:08 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: mod_jk release preparation: ready for test
>
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > it's a seems to be a tomcat-native (1.1.7) problem
> >
> > An
> -Original Message-
> From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 6:08 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: mod_jk release preparation: ready for test
>
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > it's a seems to be
Remy what about loging this error code ?
I suspect something not directly related to an error and having the
error code will be valuable.
2006/12/7, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Henri Gomez wrote:
> it's a seems to be a tomcat-native (1.1.7) problem
>
> And since we discuss Tomcat 6.0.4
In which project / class ?
2006/12/7, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Henri Gomez wrote:
> it's a seems to be a tomcat-native (1.1.7) problem
>
> And since we discuss Tomcat 6.0.4 release, should we consider that
> error as a show stopper ?
No. It existed before, and it is not known if it
it works well even when your servlet is pushing PDF data ?
Did a tcpdump/ethereal could help you ?
2006/12/7, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
In which project / class ?
2006/12/7, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > it's a seems to be a tomcat-native (1.1.7) problem
Henri Gomez wrote:
it's a seems to be a tomcat-native (1.1.7) problem
And since we discuss Tomcat 6.0.4 release, should we consider that
error as a show stopper ?
No. It works quite fine on Solaris and RHEL, as well on HP-UX
and Windows. I simply cannot reproduce this problem.
Regards,
Mlade
Henri Gomez wrote:
it's a seems to be a tomcat-native (1.1.7) problem
And since we discuss Tomcat 6.0.4 release, should we consider that
error as a show stopper ?
No. It existed before, and it is not known if it's a problem with the
Java code or not.
What I see is that there's an IO excepti
it's a seems to be a tomcat-native (1.1.7) problem
And since we discuss Tomcat 6.0.4 release, should we consider that
error as a show stopper ?
2006/12/7, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Henri Gomez wrote:
> Used :
>
> redirectPort="8443" /
>
> And it works
>
So, it's either AjpAprProtocol o
Henri Gomez wrote:
Used :
So, it's either AjpAprProtocol or native fault.
In any case its not mod_jk fault.
Just file the BZ report.
Regards,
Mladen.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-ma
Used :
:
Henri Gomez wrote:
> As I said, when I removed APR, it works
>
> I commented APR listener and remove the libtcnative.so from LIBRARY_PATH
>
Yes, I figured that out, but when removing native, the
org.apache.coyote.jk. will be used that is different
from o.a.c.ajp
so, just set
protocol="
Henri Gomez wrote:
As I said, when I removed APR, it works
I commented APR listener and remove the libtcnative.so from LIBRARY_PATH
Yes, I figured that out, but when removing native, the
org.apache.coyote.jk. will be used that is different
from o.a.c.ajp
so, just set
protocol="org.apache.coyo
As I said, when I removed APR, it works
I commented APR listener and remove the libtcnative.so from LIBRARY_PATH
2006/12/7, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Henri Gomez wrote:
> FYI, when I disable use of Apr, the problem disappears.
>
Does it works with AjpProtocol (not AjpAprProtocol)
By def
Henri Gomez wrote:
FYI, when I disable use of Apr, the problem disappears.
Does it works with AjpProtocol (not AjpAprProtocol)
By default if native load fails, the JK connector is
used, that is different then Ajp connector.
Can you set the protocol="org.apache.coyote.ajp.AjpProtocol"
and if is
FYI, when I disable use of Apr, the problem disappears.
My configuration is using, apr 1.2.7, libtcnative 1.1.7 and Tomcat 6.0.2
Question :
In Apr mode, what send to Java signal which trigg the ClientAbortException ?
Regards
2006/12/7, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Well I do more tests an
Well I do more tests and the problems occurs with LAN or localhost
configuration.
worker.w809.port=18093
worker.w809.host=localhost
worker.w809.type=ajp13
What's ServerTimeout ?
2006/12/7, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Henri Gomez wrote:
> There is still a serious problem in jk 1.2.20 wh
Henri Gomez wrote:
There is still a serious problem in jk 1.2.20 when flushing some large
file (ie: PDF).
Hard to tell without some test case and config files.
What is the socket_timeout, what is the ServerTimeout?
Regards,
Mladen.
There is still a serious problem in jk 1.2.20 when flushing some large
file (ie: PDF).
here is the dump :
file to be sent is 162748 long, iosize=8192
lReadLen=8192
lSentLen=8192
lReadLen=8192
lSentLen=16384
lReadLen=8192
lSentLen=24576
lReadLen=8192
lSentLen=32768
lReadLen=8192
lSentLen=40960
lR
Henri Gomez wrote:
BTW, windows binaries are very welcome !
I'll prepare them later today, and hand them
over to the Rainer. (Well I'll put them on
my people.a.o)
Regards,
Mladen.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW, windows binaries are very welcome !
2006/12/6, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mladen and you, are now our JK experts ;)
BTW, I'll take a look at them and tests them on my dev and prod servers
Good works !
2006/12/6, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I think Mladen and I comple
Mladen and you, are now our JK experts ;)
BTW, I'll take a look at them and tests them on my dev and prod servers
Good works !
2006/12/6, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I think Mladen and I completed our code change plans for the next
release of mod_jk. Since over all we had more change
Hi,
I think Mladen and I completed our code change plans for the next
release of mod_jk. Since over all we had more changes than we expected
when we started for 1.2.20 I would like to give the opportunity of
testing, before I do the tagging. In case no show stoppers will be found
I suggest tagging
27 matches
Mail list logo
