On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 28/06/2013 12:47, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>> > Hi folks,
>> > while playing around with tyrus and tomcat implementation of websocket I
>> > spotted a difference in the way sendB
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 28/06/2013 12:47, Niki Dokovski wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > while playing around with tyrus and tomcat implementation of websocket I
> > spotted a difference in the way sendBinary is actually implemented. In
> > short: tyrus uses bytebuffer.ar
On 28/06/2013 12:47, Niki Dokovski wrote:
> Hi folks,
> while playing around with tyrus and tomcat implementation of websocket I
> spotted a difference in the way sendBinary is actually implemented. In
> short: tyrus uses bytebuffer.array(), hence there is no change in buffer's
> position while we
Hi folks,
while playing around with tyrus and tomcat implementation of websocket I
spotted a difference in the way sendBinary is actually implemented. In
short: tyrus uses bytebuffer.array(), hence there is no change in buffer's
position while we end with channel write operation that does this. Nei
