Why not change dist.xml to rewrite ServerInfo.properties (and other
appropriate files) when creating the distribution src pacakges?
Then the extra commits are avoided.
-Tim
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
aah, that makes sense.
Remember that the release manager is carry
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 13:14 +0200, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>
> I'll try to remember to do it for 5.5.x,
Great, pretty sure it was always done in the past. At least till 5.5.23
which was left at 5.5.20.
> Remy will opt out doing it, so
> you shouldn't depend on it.
Ok that's to bad. :(
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 19:46 +0200, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
aah, that makes sense.
Remember that the release manager is carrying his/her own
build.properties, and if you build from source, you should too.
in there you override any properties needed. That
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
aah, that makes sense.
Remember that the release manager is carrying his/her own
build.properties, and if you build from source, you should too.
in there you override any properties needed. That is why all binary
builds are correct, but your build isn't.
what y
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 19:46 +0200, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> aah, that makes sense.
>
> Remember that the release manager is carrying his/her own
> build.properties, and if you build from source, you should too.
> in there you override any properties needed. That is why all binary
> build
aah, that makes sense.
Remember that the release manager is carrying his/her own
build.properties, and if you build from source, you should too.
in there you override any properties needed. That is why all binary
builds are correct, but your build isn't.
what you are asking for is that we upd
Filip,
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 18:37 +0200, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> hey William, what are you referring to? any specific .java files that
> need a version number?
Sorry should have been more specific, the problem lies in
build.properties.default
> I was under the impression that we only
hey William, what are you referring to? any specific .java files that
need a version number?
I was under the impression that we only tag each build, and then there
is a small sucker in a property file that we swap out.
ie, when you start 5.5.23 then you see
May 23, 2007 6:35:55 PM org.apache.c
I could have swarn this was brought up recently but could not find
mention of it in archives. Guess I should file a bug on it, but it's
kinda a moot issue.
It seems the sources for 6.0.x have not really been versioned. I have
noticed it myself on occasion, but never cared enough to comment or etc.
