Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
oki doki, if we don't have any other feedback, I will make the following
adjustments
1. Use NSIS 2.0.0
Normally, the build structure is simpler with 6.0, and it seems there
won't be any such gotchas.
Rémy
-
oki doki, if we don't have any other feedback, I will make the following
adjustments
1. Use NSIS 2.0.0
2. Change the wording of LD_ASSUME_KERNEL in the release notes
and cut another build tomorrow
Filip
Remy Maucherat wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jason Brittain wrote:
Then, later, I
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jason Brittain wrote:
Then, later, I needed Java 1.5.x features, so I upgraded it to
Sun Java 1.5.0. At the time that I upgraded just the JDK, I
knew very well that I have LD_ASSUME_KERNEL set, but I
since I didn't upgrade the OS (same kernel & libs) I left that
sett
Jason Brittain wrote:
>
> Then, later, I needed Java 1.5.x features, so I upgraded it to
> Sun Java 1.5.0. At the time that I upgraded just the JDK, I
> knew very well that I have LD_ASSUME_KERNEL set, but I
> since I didn't upgrade the OS (same kernel & libs) I left that
> setting alone to see i
Hi guys.
On 8/29/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
We need to clarify the message according to Bill's comments from a
thread on this list last week.
Clarifying it would be preferable.
The message is still correct for some
users, especially those using Tomcat 4.1, JDK 1.4, and
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
We need to clarify the message according to Bill's comments from a
thread on this list last week. The message is still correct for some
users, especially those using Tomcat 4.1, JDK 1.4, and certain Linux
kernels.
It was for RH9 JDK1.4.0 and
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
We need to clarify the message according to Bill's comments from a
thread on this list last week. The message is still correct for some
users, especially those using Tomcat 4.1, JDK 1.4, and certain Linux
kernels.
It was for RH9 JDK1.4.0 and 1.3.1... Old stuff.
Look to
Hi,
We need to clarify the message according to Bill's comments from a
thread on this list last week. The message is still correct for some
users, especially those using Tomcat 4.1, JDK 1.4, and certain Linux
kernels. We should make it clear the message does not apply to all
situations, should n
Hi Filip,
I can't give the correct recommendations, but explain the flag:
The flag tells the loader not to load the default thread library, but
instead another - usually older - one. Linux had incompatible changes in
it's thread implementation and since the distros bundle so much
software, they h
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
Cool. The directory structure and signatures look good. We need to
update the release notes
(http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/v5.5.18-beta/RELEASE-NOTES) to
remove the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL section on Linux, as Bill (IIRC) pointed
out the day.
ok before I remove the LD_ASSUME
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'm still running the tests, I had some funky results come up when
I turned off development, and I am re-running the tests to make
sure it wasn't me screwing it up
This is not really re
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'm still running the tests, I had some funky results come up when I
turned off development, and I am re-running the tests to make sure it
wasn't me screwing it up
This is not really related, but where's the
ok, development=false took care of the three errors, the TCK now runs
error free for the first run, any subsequent runs I get about 50 or so
errors.
If I delete the contents of the work directory, it again runs error
free, I'll do some investigations to see if its an actual issue
Filip
Remy
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'm still running the tests, I had some funky results come up when I
turned off development, and I am re-running the tests to make sure it
wasn't me screwing it up
This is not really related, but where's the 5.5.18 build ?
http://people.ap
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'm still running the tests, I had some funky results come up when I
turned off development, and I am re-running the tests to make sure it
wasn't me screwing it up
This is not really related, but where's the 5.5.18 build ?
Rémy
-
I'm still running the tests, I had some funky results come up when I
turned off development, and I am re-running the tests to make sure it
wasn't me screwing it up
Filip
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Dies Koper wrote:
Hello Filip,
In my application I used a pageContext.include which once threw a
Dies Koper wrote:
Hello Filip,
In my application I used a pageContext.include which once threw a
JasperException (ServletException) while it was supposed to (according
to the spec) propagate the IOException as-is.
I noticed that setting the "deployment" init param in conf\web.xml to
"false" m
Hello Filip,
In my application I used a pageContext.include which once threw a
JasperException (ServletException) while it was supposed to (according
to the spec) propagate the IOException as-is.
I noticed that setting the "deployment" init param in conf\web.xml to
"false" made it propagate th
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
in hindsight I think its ok to let these slip
Probably. The first thing to check is if it's required somewhere in the
specification for that (and if it's required, well ... lol). The main
problem is that IOE is a checked exception, so there's a throws clause
wh
in hindsight I think its ok to let these slip
filip
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Looks like the TCK is expecting a IOException, and not a runtime
jasper exception when you have invalid TLD files is one of the errors.
---
Test FAILED. Exception throw
Looks like the TCK is expecting a IOException, and not a runtime jasper
exception when you have invalid TLD files is one of the errors.
---
Test FAILED. Exception thrown by forwardedresource, but was not an
instance of IOException
Type thrown: org.apac
great, I will let the feedback gather up a little bit, (waiting for the
TCK tests to complete)
then make the adjustments
Filip
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
Cool. The directory structure and signatures look good. We need to
update the release notes
(http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/v5.5.18-beta/RE
Hi,
Cool. The directory structure and signatures look good. We need to
update the release notes
(http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/v5.5.18-beta/RELEASE-NOTES) to
remove the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL section on Linux, as Bill (IIRC) pointed
out the day.
Yoav
On 8/28/06, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PR
I have created a 5.5.18 distribution located at
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/v5.5.18-beta/
I'm about to setup the TCK tests, servlet and JSP, to validate against
it. In the meantime feel free to play around with it.
Once we deem that it looks correct, we can setup a vote for it.
Filip
-
24 matches
Mail list logo
