On 08.01.2010 23:10, Yoav Shapira wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
2010/1/6 Mark Thomas:
On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in th
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2010/1/6 Mark Thomas :
>> On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>> Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
>>> i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7 builds,
>>> so people c
On 08/01/2010 20:34, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Could you do it again ?
I could (as could any other committer) but I'd rather wait a day or so
until I finish off this JSP/EL work. I'm almost there...
Mark
>
> 2010/1/8 Mark Thomas :
>> On 08/01/2010 19:12, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> 2010/1/8 Mark Thomas :
Could you do it again ?
2010/1/8 Mark Thomas :
> On 08/01/2010 19:12, Henri Gomez wrote:
>> 2010/1/8 Mark Thomas :
>>> On 08/01/2010 18:54, Costin Manolache wrote:
Yes. BTW - if you use maven, it'll download, build and test against tomcat6
jars ( since tomcat7 is not in maven ).
>>>
>>>
On 08/01/2010 19:12, Henri Gomez wrote:
> 2010/1/8 Mark Thomas :
>> On 08/01/2010 18:54, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>> Yes. BTW - if you use maven, it'll download, build and test against tomcat6
>>> jars ( since tomcat7 is not in maven ).
>>
>> It is a few months out of date but it is there. I was pl
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/01/2010 18:54, Costin Manolache wrote:
> > Yes. BTW - if you use maven, it'll download, build and test against
> tomcat6
> > jars ( since tomcat7 is not in maven ).
>
> It is a few months out of date but it is there. I was planning on
>
2010/1/8 Mark Thomas :
> On 08/01/2010 18:54, Costin Manolache wrote:
>> Yes. BTW - if you use maven, it'll download, build and test against tomcat6
>> jars ( since tomcat7 is not in maven ).
>
> It is a few months out of date but it is there. I was planning on
> another update when I get the EL st
Well, I'll take a look a Tomcat Lite and SPDY :)
And see what can be done
2010/1/8 Costin Manolache :
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>
>> >> Any comments on including the experimental SPDY support (
>> >> http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol ) ?
>> >> I know we had co
On 08/01/2010 18:54, Costin Manolache wrote:
> Yes. BTW - if you use maven, it'll download, build and test against tomcat6
> jars ( since tomcat7 is not in maven ).
It is a few months out of date but it is there. I was planning on
another update when I get the EL stuff fixed.
http://people.apache
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> >> Any comments on including the experimental SPDY support (
> >> http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol ) ?
> >> I know we had countless debates on JK2 and http proxies, but some extra
> code
> >> to try out doesn't hurt :-)
> >
> > We nee
On 01/08/2010 11:15 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> Any comments on including the experimental SPDY support (
>>> http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol ) ?
>>> I know we had countless debates on JK2 and http proxies, but some extra code
>>> to try out doesn't hurt :-)
>>
>> We need a httpd module (
>> Any comments on including the experimental SPDY support (
>> http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol ) ?
>> I know we had countless debates on JK2 and http proxies, but some extra code
>> to try out doesn't hurt :-)
>
> We need a httpd module (like mod_proxy_ajp) for that :-)
mod_proxy_spdy
On 01/07/2010 05:50 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>> Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
>>> i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7 b
Le 7 janv. 2010 à 17:50, Costin Manolache a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with
(temporarily -
i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7
b
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
> > Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
> > i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7 builds,
> > so people can try it out.
>
> How about ad
2010/1/6 Mark Thomas :
> On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
>> Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
>> i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7 builds,
>> so people can try it out.
>
> How about adding it to the extras build? It co
+1 - I like the ideas
+0 - [Day job time constraints to help - but I'll look as I can]
-Tim
On 1/5/2010 7:27 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7 builds,
so people can
On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
> Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
> i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7 builds,
> so people can try it out.
How about adding it to the extras build? It could be included in the
release
Hi,
I'm still working on lite - right now my primary goal is to finish the
connector, and have it usable as part of tomcat7, along with
nio and apr connectors. The lite connector is based on nio ( could support
apr as well ), but is intended to be directly usable by
users - it supports both client
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> And what about some sort of OSGI glue
Thanks for volunteering :-).
Note that my goal is to _remove_ any framework feature from tomcat-lite -
leave just http and
services, no config file or class loading.
The current 'integration' interface se
And what about some sort of OSGI glue and Maven as build tool ?
2009/11/6 Costin Manolache :
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Tim Funk wrote:
>
>> I am intrigued by the idea and have similar constraints (kids+job).
>>
>> My longer term interest in lite was a simpler deployment and moving config
Quick update: I've been working on the async protocol and the proxy,
cleaning up a bit and adding the POST support.
I think it's getting better, but I think I'll leave it in sandbox a bit
more, so the rest of the code gets used with the stable
connectors. IMO it's pretty cool - but not ready, want
22 matches
Mail list logo
