On 21/03/2013 22:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/03/2013 20:55, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> I plan to get the most recent FileUpload changes (if any), run the unit
>> tests, run the TCKs and then tag 7.0.39 so that should happen some time
>> early tomorrow if all goes well.
>
> Second attempt.
>
> Unit
On 20/03/2013 20:55, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I plan to get the most recent FileUpload changes (if any), run the unit
> tests, run the TCKs and then tag 7.0.39 so that should happen some time
> early tomorrow if all goes well.
Second attempt.
Unit tests for 7.0.x/trunk both passed. Running the TCKs n
On 20/03/2013 20:58, Nick Williams wrote:
>
> On Mar 20, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> I plan to get the most recent FileUpload changes (if any), run the unit
>> tests, run the TCKs and then tag 7.0.39 so that should happen some time
>> early tomorrow if all goes well.
>>
>> Mark
>
>
On 20/03/2013 21:31, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2013/3/21 Mark Thomas :
>> I plan to get the most recent FileUpload changes (if any), run the unit
>> tests, run the TCKs and then tag 7.0.39 so that should happen some time
>> early tomorrow if all goes well.
>
> 1. There are some jdbc-pool bugs th
2013/3/21 Mark Thomas :
> I plan to get the most recent FileUpload changes (if any), run the unit
> tests, run the TCKs and then tag 7.0.39 so that should happen some time
> early tomorrow if all goes well.
1. There are some jdbc-pool bugs that are worth looking at
https://issues.apache.org/bugzil
On Mar 20, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I plan to get the most recent FileUpload changes (if any), run the unit
> tests, run the TCKs and then tag 7.0.39 so that should happen some time
> early tomorrow if all goes well.
>
> Mark
In 54734 I propose a patch that needs to also be back-p
I plan to get the most recent FileUpload changes (if any), run the unit
tests, run the TCKs and then tag 7.0.39 so that should happen some time
early tomorrow if all goes well.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomca
