Chuck,
On 11/12/25 11:16 AM, Chuck Caldarale wrote:
On 2025 Nov 12, at 07:56, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
I can also post my interface info class source if anyone is
interested in what their system interfaces loo like to Windows.
Of course, I meant "Java" above, not "Windows".
I’d certain
Dimitris,
On 11/12/25 9:21 AM, Dimitris Soumis wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 4:03 PM Christopher Schultz <
[email protected]> wrote:
I can also post my interface info class source if anyone is interested
in what their system interfaces loo like to Windows.
This could help id
> On 2025 Nov 12, at 07:56, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>
> I can also post my interface info class source if anyone is interested in
> what their system interfaces loo like to Windows.
I’d certainly like to use it. Thanks.
- Chuck
-
On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 4:03 PM Christopher Schultz <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Dimitris,
>
> On 11/11/25 5:46 PM, Dimitris Soumis wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 9:47 PM Christopher Schultz <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Mark,
> >>
> >> On 11/11/25 1:17 PM, Ch
Dimitris,
On 11/11/25 5:46 PM, Dimitris Soumis wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 9:47 PM Christopher Schultz <
[email protected]> wrote:
Mark,
On 11/11/25 1:17 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 11/11/25 10:53 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 11/10/25 10:08 AM, Mark Th
On 11/11/2025 22:46, Dimitris Soumis wrote:
Kind of late to the discussion, but the link-local IPv6 to be on the
loopback interface is not the default on Linux and the test gets skipped. I
propose the following patch:
+1
Mark
-
On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 9:47 PM Christopher Schultz <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 11/11/25 1:17 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> > Mark,
> >
> > On 11/11/25 10:53 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> >> Mark,
> >>
> >> On 11/10/25 10:08 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >>> On 10/11/202
Mark,
On 11/11/25 1:17 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 11/11/25 10:53 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 11/10/25 10:08 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 10/11/2025 15:01, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 11/10/25 9:48 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 10/11/2025 14:15, Christopher Schult
Mark,
On 11/11/25 10:53 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 11/10/25 10:08 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 10/11/2025 15:01, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 11/10/25 9:48 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 10/11/2025 14:15, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
I've been looking into this, and I think
Mark,
On 11/10/25 10:08 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 10/11/2025 15:01, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 11/10/25 9:48 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 10/11/2025 14:15, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
I've been looking into this, and I think the problem is that all of
the link-local interfaces de
On 10/11/2025 15:01, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 11/10/25 9:48 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 10/11/2025 14:15, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
I've been looking into this, and I think the problem is that all of
the link-local interfaces detected during this test are not actually
routabl
Mark,
On 11/10/25 9:48 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 10/11/2025 14:15, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
I've been looking into this, and I think the problem is that all of
the link-local interfaces detected during this test are not actually
routable:
fe80:0:0:0:2609:93a5:c4ac:15ea%utun7
fe80:0:
On 10/11/2025 14:15, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
I've been looking into this, and I think the problem is that all of the
link-local interfaces detected during this test are not actually routable:
fe80:0:0:0:2609:93a5:c4ac:15ea%utun7
fe80:0:0:0:926b:f264:7ec7:283e%utun6
fe80:0:0:0:4ab0:173
All,
I've been looking into this, and I think the problem is that all of the
link-local interfaces detected during this test are not actually routable:
fe80:0:0:0:2609:93a5:c4ac:15ea%utun7
fe80:0:0:0:926b:f264:7ec7:283e%utun6
fe80:0:0:0:4ab0:1734:75f8:c236%utun5
fe80:0:0:0:edc2:bbe0:ab0e:db71%
14 matches
Mail list logo
