Tagging 9.0.x / 8.5.x

Hi, I'm getting close to the point where I'll be ready to tag the next 9.0.x and 8.5.x releases. The remaining items on the TODO list are: - check POEditor for i18n updates - check Commons Pool and friends for updates - BZ 63982 - complete SSI JAR refactoring - some clean-up / refactoring I've be

Tagging 9.0.x

Hi all, It is a new month so I am thinking about the next tag. It looks like we have got to the bottom of the 32-bit crashes with Commons Daemon so my rough plan is: - fix the 32-bit crash - fix a couple of other minor regressions - release Commons Daemon 1.2.1 - update 9.0.x, 8.5.x and 7.0.x to

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 11:40 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2019-06-03-h2-v1.patch I'm testing extensively, and this patch http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2019-06-03-h2-v2.patch looks good to me. Rémy

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 11:40 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/06/2019 22:29, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > > How about this as an idea: > > > > --- a/java/org/apache/coyote/AbstractProtocol.java > > +++ b/java/org/apache/coyote/AbstractProtocol.java > > @@ -905,6 +905,10 @@ > >

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

On 03/06/2019 22:29, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > How about this as an idea: > > --- a/java/org/apache/coyote/AbstractProtocol.java > +++ b/java/org/apache/coyote/AbstractProtocol.java > @@ -905,6 +905,10 @@ >                                  } >                              }

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 11:06 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/06/2019 21:45, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:05 PM Mark Thomas > > wrote: > > > > On 03/06/2019 19:54, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > > > > > > > > Ok, that's completely different ;)

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

On 03/06/2019 21:45, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:05 PM Mark Thomas > wrote: > > On 03/06/2019 19:54, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > > > > Ok, that's completely different ;) I tried to be careful with > that, but > > the algorithm ch

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:05 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/06/2019 19:54, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > > > > Ok, that's completely different ;) I tried to be careful with that, but > > the algorithm changes to non blocking, so obviously there were some > > risks involved. I'll have a quick look at

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

On 03/06/2019 19:54, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > Ok, that's completely different ;) I tried to be careful with that, but > the algorithm changes to non blocking, so obviously there were some > risks involved. I'll have a quick look at it, but you can go ahead with > your window update fix and tag, t

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 8:36 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/06/2019 16:43, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 03/06/2019 14:15, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > > > >> I think I have found at least one more edge case around the > >> Stream/Connection allocation handling. Fixing it is going to mean > going

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

On 03/06/2019 16:43, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/06/2019 14:15, Rémy Maucherat wrote: >> I think I have found at least one more edge case around the >> Stream/Connection allocation handling. Fixing it is going to mean going >> back to a synchronizing on a single object (Stream) so the

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

On 03/06/2019 14:15, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 1:21 PM Mark Thomas > wrote: > > Hi, > > It is the start of another month so I intend to tag 9.0.x and 8.5.x > shortly. Or at least I did until I found a handful of HTTP/2 related > failu

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 1:21 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > It is the start of another month so I intend to tag 9.0.x and 8.5.x > shortly. Or at least I did until I found a handful of HTTP/2 related > failures when I ran the unit tests on Windows for 9.0.x. > Bad news :( I haven't run into it. +

Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

Hi, It is the start of another month so I intend to tag 9.0.x and 8.5.x shortly. Or at least I did until I found a handful of HTTP/2 related failures when I ran the unit tests on Windows for 9.0.x. I think I have found at least one more edge case around the Stream/Connection allocation handling.

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 11:23 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > Just a heads up that I'm intended to tag these soon. Possibly tomorrow > but certainly by the end of the week. I just have a few things I want to > look at first. > Should I leave the async IO code enabled, or should it remain disabled

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

Hi Mark, Thanks for the heads up! I'd like to fill in some missing Korean translations (~ 10 new items), and push the exported strings in the master branch tonight. Cheers, Woonsan On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 5:23 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > > Hi, > > Just a heads up that I'm intended to tag these soon

Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

Hi, Just a heads up that I'm intended to tag these soon. Possibly tomorrow but certainly by the end of the week. I just have a few things I want to look at first. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org

Tagging 9.0.x

Hi all, I'd like to tag 9.0.x at the end of this week. To do that the 1.2.21 native votes needs to pass. Please try and make time to test and vote on that release. Thanks, Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.a

Re: Tagging 9.0.x

On 03/09/18 16:13, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/09/18 14:47, Rémy Maucherat wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 12:53 PM Mark Thomas wrote: >> >>> On 03/09/18 11:40, Rémy Maucherat wrote: On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 12:19 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi all, > > As the start of September i

Re: Tagging 9.0.x

On 03/09/18 17:30, Eric Lilja wrote: > On 2018-09-03 12:19, Mark Thomas wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> As the start of September is here I'm planning to tag 9.0.x (and 8.5.x) >> shortly and roll the next monthly release. >> > > Hi! Will there be a new release of tomcat native to go with 9.0.x? There is

Re: Tagging 9.0.x

On 2018-09-03 12:19, Mark Thomas wrote: Hi all, As the start of September is here I'm planning to tag 9.0.x (and 8.5.x) shortly and roll the next monthly release. Hi! Will there be a new release of tomcat native to go with 9.0.x? - Eric L

Re: Tagging 9.0.x

On 03/09/18 14:47, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 12:53 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On 03/09/18 11:40, Rémy Maucherat wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 12:19 PM Mark Thomas wrote: >>> Hi all, As the start of September is here I'm planning to tag 9.0.x (and 8.5.x) >>

Re: Tagging 9.0.x

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 12:53 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/09/18 11:40, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 12:19 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> As the start of September is here I'm planning to tag 9.0.x (and 8.5.x) > >> shortly and roll the next monthly release.

Re: Tagging 9.0.x

On 03/09/18 11:40, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 12:19 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> As the start of September is here I'm planning to tag 9.0.x (and 8.5.x) >> shortly and roll the next monthly release. >> >> I've a couple of things I want to look at first so I'll prob

Re: Tagging 9.0.x

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 12:19 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi all, > > As the start of September is here I'm planning to tag 9.0.x (and 8.5.x) > shortly and roll the next monthly release. > > I've a couple of things I want to look at first so I'll probably be > tagging in the next day or two. > > What

Tagging 9.0.x

Hi all, As the start of September is here I'm planning to tag 9.0.x (and 8.5.x) shortly and roll the next monthly release. I've a couple of things I want to look at first so I'll probably be tagging in the next day or two. What is the view on BZ 62667 (the rewrite issue). Is that a bug or an enh

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

On 31/05/18 15:14, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:20 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> June is almost upon us so I'm thinking about the next release round. >> >> I've got a couple of small tasks on my personal TODO list and there are >> one or two BZ issues that could be

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:20 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi all, > > June is almost upon us so I'm thinking about the next release round. > > I've got a couple of small tasks on my personal TODO list and there are > one or two BZ issues that could be resolved. I plan to complete these > tasks and the

Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

Hi all, June is almost upon us so I'm thinking about the next release round. I've got a couple of small tasks on my personal TODO list and there are one or two BZ issues that could be resolved. I plan to complete these tasks and then tag. Depending how things go, I currently anticipate tagging la

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > As we have just passed the start of the month I plan to fix any open > bugs and then tag with a view to releasing end of this week / early next. > +1 On the BZ front, it looks pretty good. Rémy

Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

As we have just passed the start of the month I plan to fix any open bugs and then tag with a view to releasing end of this week / early next. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional comman

Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

Hi, It is the beginning on the month again so I am planning on tagging early next week. There are a few bugs still to be fixed so that might slip a little. Please respond on these thread if you need me to delay for any reason. Mark ---

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

On 08/01/18 09:31, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2018-01-04 23:42 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas : >> Hi all, >> >> It is the start of a new month and the open issue list looks to be clear >> so I'm planning on tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x early next week. > > Is there a

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

2018-01-04 23:42 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas : > Hi all, > > It is the start of a new month and the open issue list looks to be clear > so I'm planning on tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x early next week. Is there a need for a new Tomcat-Native build for Windows, to update to OpenSSL 1.0.2n (re

Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

Hi all, It is the start of a new month and the open issue list looks to be clear so I'm planning on tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x early next week. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For addit

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and friends

On 08/03/17 20:43, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > 2017-03-08 20:52 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas : > >>> @ Gump : not configured, not tested by Gump >>> >>> Tomcat 8.0: >>> @ Buildbot: broken, red - the following test is failing: >>> TEST-org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.TestCloseBug58624.NIO2.txt >> >> NIO2 w

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and friends

2017-03-08 20:52 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas : > > @ Gump : not configured, not tested by Gump > > > > Tomcat 8.0: > > @ Buildbot: broken, red - the following test is failing: > > TEST-org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.TestCloseBug58624.NIO2.txt > > NIO2 was experimental in 8.0.x so I wasn't too concer

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and friends

On 08/03/17 19:36, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2017-03-08 18:11 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas : >> Hi, >> >> Just a heads up that I will be tagging 9.0.x shortly followed by working >> my way through the versions in turn all the way to 6.0.x (unless someone >> beat

Re: Tagging 9.0.x and friends

2017-03-08 18:11 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas : > Hi, > > Just a heads up that I will be tagging 9.0.x shortly followed by working > my way through the versions in turn all the way to 6.0.x (unless someone > beats me to any of them - help always appreciated). > > The Windows s

Tagging 9.0.x and friends

Hi, Just a heads up that I will be tagging 9.0.x shortly followed by working my way through the versions in turn all the way to 6.0.x (unless someone beats me to any of them - help always appreciated). The Windows signing service is not currently available so I will be releasing without signing

Tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x

Hi, Just a quick heads up that I hope to be tagging 9.0.x and 8.5.x soon - maybe as early as tomorrow. As always, I want to clear the open bugs first so that might push the tag back a day or too depending on how complex the remaining issues turn out to be. Mark

Re: Tagging 9.0.x, 8.5.x, 8.0.x

On 06/06/2016 20:10, Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > I've just finished reviewing the open bugs so, barring any new bugs > appearing over night, I plan to start the release process for the > branches in the subject line tomorrow (in around 12 hours). Looking at the Gump failure in trunk, there looks

Tagging 9.0.x, 8.5.x, 8.0.x

Hi, I've just finished reviewing the open bugs so, barring any new bugs appearing over night, I plan to start the release process for the branches in the subject line tomorrow (in around 12 hours). Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: