Re: Tagging 7.0.30

2012-09-01 Thread Mark Thomas
On 01/09/2012 09:29, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 31/08/2012 23:06, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 31/08/2012 17:06, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> I am seeing a repeatable failure of a Comet test (stop >>> connector) with APR on Linux. I want to take a look at this before >>>

Re: Tagging 7.0.30

2012-09-01 Thread Mark Thomas
On 31/08/2012 23:06, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 31/08/2012 17:06, Mark Thomas wrote: >> I am seeing a repeatable failure of a Comet test (stop >> connector) with APR on Linux. I want to take a look at this before >> tagging 7.0.30. > > Unit tests now passing consist

Re: Tagging 7.0.30

2012-08-31 Thread Mark Thomas
On 31/08/2012 17:06, Mark Thomas wrote: > I am seeing a repeatable failure of a Comet test (stop > connector) with APR on Linux. I want to take a look at this before > tagging 7.0.30. Unit tests now passing consistently on my local Linux and Windows systems (as well as buildbot). I a

Re: Tagging 7.0.30

2012-08-31 Thread Mark Thomas
rMemoryLeak#testTimerThreadLeak >> >> Tested BIOxNIOxAPR (native 1.1.24) with JDK 6u34 32-bit on WinXP > > Thanks for that confirmation. > > I believe we are now good to tag 7.0.30. I'll run the TCKs

Re: Tagging 7.0.30

2012-08-30 Thread Mark Thomas
On 28/08/2012 02:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2012/8/27 Mark Thomas : >> Hi, >> >> I have all the open bugs fixed for 7.0.x with the exception of BZ53469 >> that is pending input from the Servlet EG before a final fix (if any) is >> applied. >> >> I have a few other bits and pieces I want to do

Re: Tagging 7.0.30

2012-08-27 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/8/27 Mark Thomas : > Hi, > > I have all the open bugs fixed for 7.0.x with the exception of BZ53469 > that is pending input from the Servlet EG before a final fix (if any) is > applied. > > I have a few other bits and pieces I want to do before I tag 7.0.30 but > (assuming no more bugs are ope

Re: Tagging 7.0.30

2012-08-27 Thread Ralph Plawetzki
Dear Mark, would you mind to take a look at BZ51496? As you pointed out your focus is to get open bugs fixed for 7.0.30. Well, this is not a bug, but an enhancement and to be honest I don’t know if it is planned to consider enhancements for minor releases as well. I proposed a patch. Thank you.

Tagging 7.0.30

2012-08-26 Thread Mark Thomas
Hi, I have all the open bugs fixed for 7.0.x with the exception of BZ53469 that is pending input from the Servlet EG before a final fix (if any) is applied. I have a few other bits and pieces I want to do before I tag 7.0.30 but (assuming no more bugs are opened) I anticipate tagging in the next