Re: Tagging 1.2.29

On 02/23/2010 08:41 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Mladen, Should we mention in the changelog, that it needs improvement? Sure. Go ahead and add a notice. changelog might not be the proper place, but it seems we don't have anything more appropriate. Thanks for those last minute updates! Cheers

Re: Tagging 1.2.29

Hi Mladen, On 22.02.2010 14:39, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, I plan to tag 1.2.29 tomorrow around 12:00 GMT and later propose a vote. We had few release snapshots that had no show-stoppers reported beside one bug and one regression that are already solved. In case someone has a serious reason why I

Re: Tagging 1.2.29

No problem, go Mladen 2010/2/22 Rainer Jung : > - silence from me - > > (but I still plan to review the changes later today) > > On 22.02.2010 14:39, Mladen Turk wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I plan to tag 1.2.29 tomorrow around 12:00 GMT >> and later propose a vote. >> We had few release snapshots that

Re: Tagging 1.2.29

- silence from me - (but I still plan to review the changes later today) On 22.02.2010 14:39, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, I plan to tag 1.2.29 tomorrow around 12:00 GMT and later propose a vote. We had few release snapshots that had no show-stoppers reported beside one bug and one regression that a

Tagging 1.2.29

Hi, I plan to tag 1.2.29 tomorrow around 12:00 GMT and later propose a vote. We had few release snapshots that had no show-stoppers reported beside one bug and one regression that are already solved. In case someone has a serious reason why I shouldn't do that, please speak. Regards -- ^TM ---