I agree.
It's a good test and it has very well done the job.
+1 with the approach. Seems reasonable
Le sam. 12 nov. 2022, 12:23, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> On 11/11/2022 14:39, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 3:24 PM Rainer Jung
> wrote:
> >>
> >> FYI: the performance check Test
On 11/11/2022 14:39, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 3:24 PM Rainer Jung wrote:
FYI: the performance check TestMessageBytes.testConversionPerformance()
seems to fail sometimes for various Linux variants and JVM versions. It
fails in 13 out of 116 combinations of Linux distro, JVM
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 3:24 PM Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> FYI: the performance check TestMessageBytes.testConversionPerformance()
> seems to fail sometimes for various Linux variants and JVM versions. It
> fails in 13 out of 116 combinations of Linux distro, JVM version and
> provider and connector.
FYI: the performance check TestMessageBytes.testConversionPerformance()
seems to fail sometimes for various Linux variants and JVM versions. It
fails in 13 out of 116 combinations of Linux distro, JVM version and
provider and connector.
When failing, it complains, that the non-optimised versio
