On Nov 24, 2006, at 3:06 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
In my opinion the only change is:
- old code: retries=2 means first try to close all conns and
second try
with new connection
- new code: retries=2 means first try to close all conns and
immediate
new conn, second try a "
OK, convinced. I'll change that tomorrow and add a respective note to
the docs fpr ajp retries in relation to lb.
Mladen Turk schrieb:
> Rainer Jung wrote:
>>
>> In my opinion the only change is:
>>
>> - old code: retries=2 means first try to close all conns and second try
>> with new connection
>
Rainer Jung wrote:
In my opinion the only change is:
- old code: retries=2 means first try to close all conns and second try
with new connection
- new code: retries=2 means first try to close all conns and immediate
new conn, second try a "real" retry.
Right, and that is the problem.
With re
Hi Mladen,
I read our code as follows:
in any case where a function in the while loop does produce an error, we
close the connection afterwards:
- if jk_is_socket_connected() fails, we do it explicitely via
jk_close_socket()
- if ajp_handle_cping_cpong() fails, we don't go into
ajp_connection_t
Hi Mladen,
Mladen Turk schrieb:
> Rainer Jung wrote:
>> For those who want to test: I committed far the most part of what I
>> planned to improve.
>
> Thanks Rainer, the patches you made are really great!
> I think we'll have a best ever mod_jk.
Thanks for the credits, I hope they work.
> Howev
Rainer Jung wrote:
For those who want to test: I committed far the most part of what I
planned to improve.
Thanks Rainer, the patches you made are really great!
I think we'll have a best ever mod_jk.
However I still have doubts about you patch:
> @@ -1219,8 +1219,8 @@
> jk_log(l,
For those who want to test: I committed far the most part of what I
planned to improve. The rest of the things, I want to work on (depending
on time) concerns only much smaller code areas:
- checking consistency for logging/%R/NOTES concerning worker name
versus jvmRoute
- XML and txt mime ty
