Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'll go ahead and plow forward if that is OK, and then we can disregard
it if it turns into crap.
I adopted this change, as it doesn't really seem possible to
differentiate events otherwise, so it doesn't look like crap to me at
the moment.
Rémy
-
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Can we split up SocketStatus.OPEN into
SocketStatus.OPEN_READ - for read events
SocketStatus.OPEN_WRITE - for write events
currently SocketStatus.OPEN is for READ events,
or if you have another suggestion to process data, let me know
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Can we split up SocketStatus.OPEN into
SocketStatus.OPEN_READ - for read events
SocketStatus.OPEN_WRITE - for write events
currently SocketStatus.OPEN is for READ events,
or if you have another suggestion to process data, let me know
It's possible som
Can we split up SocketStatus.OPEN into
SocketStatus.OPEN_READ - for read events
SocketStatus.OPEN_WRITE - for write events
currently SocketStatus.OPEN is for READ events,
or if you have another suggestion to process data, let me know
Filip
