Bit off topic, but couldn't stop thinking about it :)
Those mails are actually some kind of chaos theory proof. You being the butterfly flapping your
wings (typing some characters on the keyboard) and we all have witnessed what a flap of a wing can
cause :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Mladen Turk wrote:
If
Hi,
On 7/20/06, Ian Darwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And honestly, people who want to filter these messages out can do so,
> whether they are on their own list or on this one. It's quite easy to
> create rules for them, including temporary filters like to handle
> today's unusual amount of
Why is subscribing to two lists so hard? I expect that a significant
proportion of this list do not want the svn messages - and opt in
seems far more friendly than filter out.
Just my $0.02
andy
At 21:18 20/07/2006, Rainer Jung wrote:
I found it easy to delete via filtering for "svn
And honestly, people who want to filter these messages out can do so,
whether they are on their own list or on this one. It's quite easy to
create rules for them, including temporary filters like to handle
today's unusual amount of messages.
That is the wrong answer:-) You are ignoring the an
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 7/20/06, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The svn messages are quite horrible IMO. Is there any way to suppress
them
in future ?
So all in all, let's treat today as the unusual event it was in terms
of volume of SVN messages, and keep thin
rce anyone to read them, those
who
do want to read them will subscribe to a list ( or set a filter ) anyway,
those who
don't will also set a filter or ignore them.
Costin
On 7/20/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 7/20/06, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
list.
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 7/20/06, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The svn messages are quite horrible IMO. Is there any way to suppress
them
in future ?
Some projects have a separate
[svn|commits|cvs|[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. We
could do that, but then you can
Costin Manolache wrote:
The svn messages are quite horrible IMO. Is there any way to suppress them
in future ?
Yes - it's really this project's fault that you didn't adopt the suggestion
that dev@ discussion and commits@ notification don't belong on the same list ;-)
Hi,
On 7/20/06, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The svn messages are quite horrible IMO. Is there any way to suppress them
in future ?
Some projects have a separate
[svn|commits|cvs|[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. We
could do that, but then you can into the mode of remindi
The svn messages are quite horrible IMO. Is there any way to suppress them
in future ?
Regarding the move - again, IMO it was not necessary, nothing prevented
creation of
a /sandbox/foo, and I think having a common java/ tree for components that
didn't want
separate tree was a good thing
If anyone wonders what all those SVN commit messages are about,
they are about moving the /sandbox to the /sandbox/tomcat-lite
I choose the name, but I suppose Costing might have other ideas,
so a simple 'svn mv tomcat-lite what-ever-name' should do the trick.
The problems was because the /path/*
11 matches
Mail list logo
