Re: SSL compression / bug 54324

2013-01-22 Thread Christopher Schultz
Konstantin, On 1/21/13 4:25 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2012/12/22 Rainer Jung : >> On 21.12.2012 16:37, Christopher Schultz wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324 >>> >>> The enhancement request (marked MAJOR) is to allow the APR connector to >>> conf

Re: SSL compression / bug 54324

2013-01-21 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/12/22 Rainer Jung : > On 21.12.2012 16:37, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> All, >> >> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324 >> >> The enhancement request (marked MAJOR) is to allow the APR connector to >> configure SSL_OP_NO_COMPRESSION in OpenSSL, disabling SSL compression >>

Re: SSL compression / bug 54324

2012-12-21 Thread Rainer Jung
On 21.12.2012 16:37, Christopher Schultz wrote: > All, > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324 > > The enhancement request (marked MAJOR) is to allow the APR connector to > configure SSL_OP_NO_COMPRESSION in OpenSSL, disabling SSL compression > even when it is supported by th

Re: SSL compression / bug 54324

2012-12-21 Thread Christopher Schultz
All, On 12/21/12 10:37 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Since this is security-related, my preference is to disable SSL > compression /by default/ and allow users to specifically enable it if > necessary. But, this represents a change in default so I figured I'd ask. One more note which reverses

SSL compression / bug 54324

2012-12-21 Thread Christopher Schultz
All, https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324 The enhancement request (marked MAJOR) is to allow the APR connector to configure SSL_OP_NO_COMPRESSION in OpenSSL, disabling SSL compression even when it is supported by the client. This prevents CRIME attacks. My question is whether