On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 3:30 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I wanted to provide an up dated on my plans for the February releases.
>
> The Tomcat Native releases are complete, the dependencies updated, open
> PRs and bugs reviewed and the translations updated. Tests are passing on
> Linux a
Mark,
On 2/17/23 09:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
Hi all,
I wanted to provide an up dated on my plans for the February releases.
The Tomcat Native releases are complete, the dependencies updated, open
PRs and bugs reviewed and the translations updated. Tests are passing on
Linux and MacOS but I am
Hi all,
I wanted to provide an up dated on my plans for the February releases.
The Tomcat Native releases are complete, the dependencies updated, open
PRs and bugs reviewed and the translations updated. Tests are passing on
Linux and MacOS but I am seeing (fairly) consistent failures on Window
Mark,
On 1/6/23 04:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
Hi all,
I've almost finished the prep for the January releases. I expect to
finish that later today. My current plan is to tag and build releases
for 11.0.x and 10.1.x at the start of next week.
+1
I'll see if I can generate a byte-faithful copy of
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 10:32 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've almost finished the prep for the January releases. I expect to
> finish that later today. My current plan is to tag and build releases
> for 11.0.x and 10.1.x at the start of next week.
+1
Rémy
-
Hi all,
I've almost finished the prep for the January releases. I expect to
finish that later today. My current plan is to tag and build releases
for 11.0.x and 10.1.x at the start of next week.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 9:07 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>
>
> On 04/10/2022 03:53, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> > Mark,
> >
> > On 10/3/22 03:33, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Given the regression in the previous set of releases and that it is
> >> the beginning of October, my intention is
On 04/10/2022 03:53, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 10/3/22 03:33, Mark Thomas wrote:
Hi all,
Given the regression in the previous set of releases and that it is
the beginning of October, my intention is to start the October release
round shortly.
I have a couple of things I want t
Mark,
On 10/3/22 03:33, Mark Thomas wrote:
Hi all,
Given the regression in the previous set of releases and that it is the
beginning of October, my intention is to start the October release round
shortly.
I have a couple of things I want to look at before I tag the releases as
well as runn
Hi all,
Given the regression in the previous set of releases and that it is the
beginning of October, my intention is to start the October release round
shortly.
I have a couple of things I want to look at before I tag the releases as
well as running my usual checks with the unit tests. Hope
Mark,
On 4/29/22 06:03, Mark Thomas wrote:
Hi all,
There are a couple of things I think we need to take into account for
the May releases.
1. OpenSSL. A security release is due 2022-05-03. I am assuming we'll
need to pick that up for Tomcat Native. I am therefore planning for a
Tomcat Nati
Hi all,
There are a couple of things I think we need to take into account for
the May releases.
1. OpenSSL. A security release is due 2022-05-03. I am assuming we'll
need to pick that up for Tomcat Native. I am therefore planning for a
Tomcat Native release shortly after the OpenSSL release
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 5:09 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is the beginning of the month so I'm thinking about releases again.
>
> I remembered I'd given the ISAPI redirector installation instructions a
> long overdue update late last year but got distracted before I did a
> release. I've fi
Hi,
It is the beginning of the month so I'm thinking about releases again.
I remembered I'd given the ISAPI redirector installation instructions a
long overdue update late last year but got distracted before I did a
release. I've finished off some other ISAPI work I had sat in my dev
environment
Hi all,
I'm planning to complete the Tomcat Native 1.2.14 release tomorrow,
update 8.5.x and 9.0.x to use it and then tag them.
If there is anything you want me to hold the tags for, please let me know.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e
2017-05-04 14:02 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
>
> I'm going to hold off on the implementation of the response trailer
> support. There is some EG discussion that looks like it is going to
> change the API.
>
> I should be able to tag 9.0.x and 8.5.x later today.
I committed the fixes that I wanted.
Vi
I'm going to hold off on the implementation of the response trailer
support. There is some EG discussion that looks like it is going to
change the API.
I should be able to tag 9.0.x and 8.5.x later today.
Mark
On 04/05/17 08:28, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> 2017-05-04 10:23 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas
2017-05-04 10:23 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
>
> On 04/05/17 07:35, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> > 2017-05-04 9:33 GMT+03:00 Violeta Georgieva :
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> 2017-05-04 1:10 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
> >>>
> >>> On 02/05/17 18:03, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A new month has s
On 04/05/17 07:35, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> 2017-05-04 9:33 GMT+03:00 Violeta Georgieva :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2017-05-04 1:10 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
>>>
>>> On 02/05/17 18:03, Mark Thomas wrote:
Hi all,
A new month has started so I'm intending to do a 9.0.x and 8.5.x
> release
fa
2017-05-04 9:33 GMT+03:00 Violeta Georgieva :
>
> Hi,
>
> 2017-05-04 1:10 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
> >
> > On 02/05/17 18:03, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > A new month has started so I'm intending to do a 9.0.x and 8.5.x
release
> > > fairly soon. There are a couple of issues that I t
Hi,
2017-05-04 1:10 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
>
> On 02/05/17 18:03, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > A new month has started so I'm intending to do a 9.0.x and 8.5.x release
> > fairly soon. There are a couple of issues that I think need to be
> > resolved first:
> >
> > - https://bz.apache.o
On 02/05/17 18:03, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A new month has started so I'm intending to do a 9.0.x and 8.5.x release
> fairly soon. There are a couple of issues that I think need to be
> resolved first:
>
> - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61057 (ECJ)
> - https://bz.apache
Hi all,
A new month has started so I'm intending to do a 9.0.x and 8.5.x release
fairly soon. There are a couple of issues that I think need to be
resolved first:
- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61057 (ECJ)
- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61003 (WebSocket)
- Trai
Am 03.05.2016 um 16:53 schrieb Mark Thomas:
Hi,
OpenSSL have released the details of the security fixed in 1.0.2h. I've
looked through them quickly and it looks like at least CVE-2016-2107 is
applicable to Tomcat-Native.
Given that I haven't got 9.0.x to the point where it is ready to release
a
2016-05-03 16:53 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
> Hi,
>
> OpenSSL have released the details of the security fixed in 1.0.2h. I've
> looked through them quickly and it looks like at least CVE-2016-2107 is
> applicable to Tomcat-Native.
>
> Given that I haven't got 9.0.x to the point where it is ready to r
On 03/05/2016 16:27, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2016-05-03 16:53 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> OpenSSL have released the details of the security fixed in 1.0.2h. I've
>> looked through them quickly and it looks like at least CVE-2016-2107 is
>> applicable to Tomcat-Native.
>>
>> Given that I
2016-05-03 17:53 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
> Hi,
>
> OpenSSL have released the details of the security fixed in 1.0.2h. I've
> looked through them quickly and it looks like at least CVE-2016-2107 is
> applicable to Tomcat-Native.
>
> Given that I haven't got 9.0.x to the point where it is ready to re
2016-05-03 16:53 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
> Hi,
>
> OpenSSL have released the details of the security fixed in 1.0.2h. I've
> looked through them quickly and it looks like at least CVE-2016-2107 is
> applicable to Tomcat-Native.
>
> Given that I haven't got 9.0.x to the point where it is ready to r
Hi,
OpenSSL have released the details of the security fixed in 1.0.2h. I've
looked through them quickly and it looks like at least CVE-2016-2107 is
applicable to Tomcat-Native.
Given that I haven't got 9.0.x to the point where it is ready to release
and that it is likely to take a couple more day
2016-01-04 23:46 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> The changelog for 9.0.x is getting quite long so I'd like to do a
> release.
>
At this time the APR connector remains the default one when native is used.
I would think it should stay that way for this build, although direct
OpenSSL works for me [at some
2016-01-05 0:46 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>
> The changelog for 9.0.x is getting quite long so I'd like to do a
> release. A 8.0.x release wouldn't hurt either.
>
> I recall that Remy said it would be useful to have a Tomcat-Native
> release first before the next 9.0.x release so my current thinking
2016-01-04 23:46 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> The changelog for 9.0.x is getting quite long so I'd like to do a
> release. A 8.0.x release wouldn't hurt either.
>
> I recall that Remy said it would be useful to have a Tomcat-Native
> release first before the next 9.0.x release so my current thinking
The changelog for 9.0.x is getting quite long so I'd like to do a
release. A 8.0.x release wouldn't hurt either.
I recall that Remy said it would be useful to have a Tomcat-Native
release first before the next 9.0.x release so my current thinking is:
- tag Tomcat-Native 1.2.4 tomorrow and start t
I think I now have a nice improvement to the memory leak protection (see BZ
49159). If you have time to review it, it would be a nice addition to this
release...
Sylvain
On 30 sept. 2010, at 19:38, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I'm done with the async re-factoring. I want to run through a complete
> se
I'm done with the async re-factoring. I want to run through a complete
set of tests but I'm not expecting any major issues.
My plan for 7.0.3 is currently:
- fix as many bugs as I can between now and the weekend
- run the tests (JUnit, TCK) over the weekend
- assuming no failures, tag and roll the
On 06/06/2010 18:32, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 06.06.2010 17:41, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 06/04/2010 09:57 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> When can we make 6.0.27?
>>>
>>> There were a couple of important fixes since 6.0.26, like BZ 48903
>>> (classloader deadlock).
>>>
>>> I th
On 06.06.2010 17:41, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 06/04/2010 09:57 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Hi!
When can we make 6.0.27?
There were a couple of important fixes since 6.0.26, like BZ 48903
(classloader deadlock).
I think it is about time to make 6.0.27.
+1 I will start to prepare the s
On 06/04/2010 09:57 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When can we make 6.0.27?
>
> There were a couple of important fixes since 6.0.26, like BZ 48903
> (classloader deadlock).
>
> I think it is about time to make 6.0.27.
+1 I will start to prepare the stuff. Tag on Monday, packaging , vot
On 04/06/2010 20:57, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When can we make 6.0.27?
>
> There were a couple of important fixes since 6.0.26, like BZ 48903
> (classloader deadlock).
>
> I think it is about time to make 6.0.27.
+1
> I think that the logging improvement will need some more work and
Hi!
When can we make 6.0.27?
There were a couple of important fixes since 6.0.26, like BZ 48903
(classloader deadlock).
I think it is about time to make 6.0.27.
I think that the logging improvement will need some more work and can
go into the next release.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
--
40 matches
Mail list logo
