Reg: Bug 56438

2015-05-26 Thread Pravallika Peddi
Hi Mark, Can you review the patches that i submitted? Thanks, Pravallika

Reg: Bug 56438

2015-04-14 Thread Pravallika Peddi
Hi Mark and Justin, I have updated my comments on top of yours. Can you help check them and confirm so that i can provide the patch? Thanks, Pravallika(VIN)

Re: Reg: Bug 56438

2015-04-09 Thread Mark Thomas
On 09/04/2015 13:25, Pravallika Peddi wrote: > Hi Mark, > > > > I can add the Boolean variable at ContextConfig class level so that all > pluggability scans can access it and set the value accordingly. That is too high. It needs to be per JAR. > Almost all web-inf/lib/class scans are internall

Re: Reg: Bug 56438

2015-04-09 Thread Pravallika Peddi
Hi Mark, I can add the Boolean variable at ContextConfig class level so that all pluggability scans can access it and set the value accordingly. Almost all web-inf/lib/class scans are internally calling “processAnnotationsStream()” method of ContextConfig.java. So in this method I can change th

Re: Reg: Bug 56438

2015-04-09 Thread Mark Thomas
On 08/04/2015 14:07, Pravallika Peddi wrote: > Hi Mark, > > *Fix for Pluggability Scan in Tomcat 7.0: * You have only addressed fragment scanning. You have not addressed the other scans such as class scanning which are part of the pluggability scanning process. I agree adding a flag to track if

Re: Reg: Bug 56438

2015-04-09 Thread Mark Thomas
On 08/04/2015 11:20, Pravallika Peddi wrote: > Hi Mark, > > > Highlighted code is the Fix to add summary message to *Tomcat7.0*: Patches should be in diff -u format and are best attached to bug reports. Mark > > > In org.apache.catalina.startup.TldConfig.java à > > > > a) Return a

Re: Reg: Bug 56438

2015-04-08 Thread Pravallika Peddi
Hi Mark, *Fix for Pluggability Scan in Tomcat 7.0: * 1) Org.apache.catalina.startup.ContextConfig.java à processJarsForWebFragments(WebXml application) FragmentJarScannerCallback callback = *new* FragmentJarScannerCallback(parseRequired); jarScanner.scan(co

Re: Reg: Bug 56438

2015-04-08 Thread Pravallika Peddi
Hi Mark, Highlighted code is the Fix to add summary message to *Tomcat7.0*: In org.apache.catalina.startup.TldConfig.java à a) Return a Boolean variable from tldScanJar(JarURLConnection jarConn) method which indicates tld found or not. b) In TldJarScannerCallback inner class à ad

Re: Reg: Bug 56438

2015-04-08 Thread Pravallika Peddi
Hi Mark, Currently there is no mechanism to skip the JARs from Pluggability scan in Tomcat 8.0. Below are the fix details that i propose for *tomcat 8* pluggability scan problem: 1) Added below code in org.apache.tomcat.util.descriptor.web.FragmentJarScannerCallBack.java à

Re: Reg: Bug 56438

2015-03-28 Thread Mark Thomas
On 26/03/2015 13:27, Pravallika Peddi wrote: > 1) As mentioned in bug, in Tomcat7.0 catalina.properties file first 4 > default jars(except jdom.jar) are missing: > commons-discovery-*.jar,commons-el-*.jar,commons-net-*.jar > > We can add them under > “tomcat.util.scan.DefaultJarS

Re: Reg: Bug 56438

2015-03-27 Thread Pravallika Peddi
Hi Mark, can you please review my previous mail and confirm whether i can proceed with the fix or not? Thanks, Pravallika(VIN) On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Pravallika Peddi wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Sorry, I was on long vacation due to which I could not respond immediately > on bug: https://bz.

Re: Reg: Bug 56438

2015-03-26 Thread Pravallika Peddi
Hi Mark, Sorry, I was on long vacation due to which I could not respond immediately on bug: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56438 *Below are my further observations on Tomcat7.0 trunk:* 1) As mentioned in bug, in Tomcat7.0 catalina.properties file first 4 default jars(except

Re: Reg: Bug 56438

2015-02-25 Thread Mark Thomas
On 25/02/2015 11:46, Pravallika Peddi wrote: > Hi Mark, > > More updates on bug 56438: > > I have downloaded all the jars mentioned in the issue > except(Protomatter.jar, openspml2-toolkit.jar, ha-jdbc.jar, db2jcc4.jar, > hazelcast.jar) and added import statements in my web application for these

Re: Reg: Bug 56438

2015-02-25 Thread Pravallika Peddi
Hi Mark, More updates on bug 56438: I have downloaded all the jars mentioned in the issue except(Protomatter.jar, openspml2-toolkit.jar, ha-jdbc.jar, db2jcc4.jar, hazelcast.jar) and added import statements in my web application for these jars. I have added couple of more log messages for my rese

Re: Reg: Bug 56438

2015-02-23 Thread Pravallika Peddi
Sure Mark. I am doing the research. On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 19/02/2015 07:17, Pravallika Peddi wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > Below are my observations during my research on the bug: > > > > 1) I downloaded recent trunk and ran the ant command so that the > > build/bin/

Re: Reg: Bug 56438

2015-02-19 Thread Mark Thomas
On 19/02/2015 07:17, Pravallika Peddi wrote: > Hi Mark, > Below are my observations during my research on the bug: > > 1) I downloaded recent trunk and ran the ant command so that the > build/bin/lib folders are generated. > > 2) I created a simple web application and exported to WAR file which i

Re: Reg: Bug 56438

2015-02-18 Thread Pravallika Peddi
Hi Mark, Below are my observations during my research on the bug: 1) I downloaded recent trunk and ran the ant command so that the build/bin/lib folders are generated. 2) I created a simple web application and exported to WAR file which is of 3.4 MB size including 10 required jar files. 3) I ena

Re: Reg: Bug 56438

2015-02-17 Thread Pravallika Peddi
Sure Mark, I will try and let you know. On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 17/02/2015 06:42, Pravallika Peddi wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > Its regarding the another bug that you shared to me: > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56438 > > > > This bug involves mig

Re: Reg: Bug 56438

2015-02-17 Thread Mark Thomas
On 17/02/2015 06:42, Pravallika Peddi wrote: > Hi Mark, > Its regarding the another bug that you shared to me: > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56438 > > This bug involves migration from 5.5 to 7.0, and i am new to migration of > Tomcat releases. Hence can you assign me some other

Reg: Bug 56438

2015-02-16 Thread Pravallika Peddi
Hi Mark, Its regarding the another bug that you shared to me: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56438 This bug involves migration from 5.5 to 7.0, and i am new to migration of Tomcat releases. Hence can you assign me some other issues which can handle with code directly? Or please l